| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 30(4); 2025 > Article
Park, Lee, and Yeom: Toxic effects of benzene on aquatic organisms with different trophic levels in simulated accidental spills using indoor artificial streams

Abstract

Benzene, a toxic hydrocarbon, poses a significant threat to aquatic ecosystems, but the impact of accidental spills on aquatic organisms remains underexplored. This study simulates short-term benzene exposure in an artificial stream, evaluating its effects on aquatic species from different trophic levels, including periphytic algae, invertebrates (Moina macrocopa, Glyptotendipes tokunagai, Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri), and fish (Zacco platypus, Aphyocypris chinensis). Benzene concentrations of 150, 330, and 726 mg/L were introduced for 4 h to assess the biological responses of these species and their potential as sentinel species. Z. platypus exhibited the highest sensitivity, with significant mortality during benzene exposure, suggesting its potential as an early sentinel species. During post-exposure period, M. macrocopa exhibited reduced survival and fecundity, though reproductive recovery was observed over time. G. tokunagai populations also declined at high benzene levels. In contrast, periphytic algae, L. hoffmeisteri, A. chinensis, and fish growth were largely unaffected. These findings highlight the varying susceptibility of aquatic species to benzene exposure and suggest that Z. platypus, M. macrocopa, and G. tokunagai may be valuable for monitoring both immediate and delayed toxic effects in aquatic environments following benzene spills.

Graphical Abstract

/upload/thumbnails/eer-2024-540f5.gif

Introduction

Chemical accidents in industrial sectors pose significant risks to both humans and the environment, and these risks have escalated with the increase in the production, storage, utilization, and transportation of chemicals due to rapid industrial growth [1]. Transportation is a crucial aspect of industrial operations, as chemicals are often produced and utilized in different locations [1, 2]. Consequently, chemical spills from transport vehicle accidents have become more frequent globally. In Korea, over 20 percent of chemical accidents between 2014 and 2019 involved transport vehicle accidents [3]. Understanding the specific hazards posed by chemicals and their effects on the environment and organisms is essential to mitigating the impacts of such accidents, particularly those involving chemical transportation.
Benzene is a colorless, volatile, aromatic hydrocarbon with a gasoline-like odor [4]. It is widely used in the production of toluene, xylene, styrene, paints, thinners, inks, and pesticides [5]. Benzene is highly toxic and classified as a known carcinogen, with exposure linked to the development of leukemia [6]. While the harmful effects of benzene on aquatic organisms, such as impacts on survival, growth, and reproduction, are well-documented under laboratory conditions [7], there is a scarcity of data focusing on episodic benzene leakage in real aquatic environments, especially considering short-term, high-concentration exposures typical of accidental spills. Laboratory toxicity data often fail to fully capture the chemical's behavior under environmentally relevant conditions [8]. Moreover, field studies in natural streams can be time-consuming and complicated, making it difficult to directly link the stressor to the biological responses [9].
Artificial streams provide an effective solution by simulating natural conditions while avoiding damage to real aquatic ecosystems [10]. Such systems allow researchers to study the fate and effects of chemicals like benzene in freshwater environments in a controlled but ecologically relevant manner [11]. This study utilizes an artificial stream system designed to reflect chemical spill conditions, thereby providing more realistic results than traditional laboratory toxicity tests. To the best of our knowledge, no other study has utilized artificial streams to simulate and analyze short-term spill scenarios of benzene and assess the ecological impacts on multiple aquatic trophic levels.
In addition to simulating natural environments, it is crucial to select species that are both sensitive to toxicants and endemic to the region being studied. Endemic species are better acclimated to local environmental conditions, making them more reliable as bioindicators of the potential effects of toxicants [12]. Previous studies have often relied on standard test species that may not accurately reflect the sensitivity of local fauna. By incorporating endemic species across different trophic levels, this study provides novel insights into the ecological risks of benzene spills specific to domestic freshwater ecosystems.
Invertebrates like Moina macrocopa, Glyptotendipes tokunagai, and Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri have been proposed as bioindicators in aquatic environments [13]. M. macrocopa is widespread in Eastern Asia and is a well-recognized model species for toxicity tests due to its short lifespan (12–14 d), high fecundity, and ease of cultivation [14, 15]. G. tokunagai is widely distributed throughout East Asia and is a dominant aquatic insect species in organic-rich waters [1618]. It has a short life cycle (male: 28.3 d; female: 39.4 d) and is easily cultured in laboratories [18]. L. hoffmeisteri, an oligochaete, is abundant in polluted areas and is often used as a bioindicator of organic pollution in rivers and streams [1922]. Algae have long been employed for water pollution monitoring due to their fast growth rates and ease of cultivation [23]. Among fish, Zacco platypus is the dominant species in Korean rivers, typically inhabiting shallow, fast-flowing waters in the middle and lower reaches of rivers [24]. Aphyocypris chinensis, another endemic species in East Asia, prefers slower-flowing waters such as small rivers and agricultural waterways [25].
The objective of this study is to simulate the effects of short-term benzene leakage, caused by a tank truck accident, on domestic aquatic organisms. We analyzed the population-level effects on survival, growth, and fecundity of three trophic groups: periphytic algae, invertebrates (M. macrocopa, G. tokunagai, L. hoffmeisteri), and fish (Z. platypus, A. chinensis) in artificial streams. The potential of these species to serve as sentinel species for monitoring benzene spills was also evaluated.

Materials and Methods

2.1. Artificial Stream Design

Studies using artificial streams were conducted in an indoor glass-house located in the Gyeongnam Department of Environmental Toxicology & Chemistry, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Jinju, Korea (Fig. S1). Each stream consisted of five glass sections, beginning with a tile section (2 m length × 0.3 m width × 0.1 m height; slope of approximately 4.3%). The tile section included shallow, fast-moving water disrupted by the presence of a rough substrate, causing ripples and waves without breaking the surface tension. The tile section was followed by a gravel section (2 m length × 0.3 m width × 0.1 m height), comprising sections of moving water with distinct riffles and pools, a water velocity of < 20 cm/s, and no surface turbulence. The gravel section was followed by a pool section (1 m length × 0.3 m width × 0.4 m height), a sediment section (2 m length × 0.4 m width × 0.2 m height), and a tail tank (1 m length × 0.4 m width × 0.5 m height). The bottom of the tile section was entirely lined with unglazed ceramic tiles (8.7 × 8.7 cm). The gravel obtained from the Nakdong River was placed in the gravel section. The bottom of the pool section was covered with standard sand (Joo Mun Jin Silicasand Co., Republic of Korea). The standard sand and sediment obtained from the Nam River were placed in the sediment section. The overall volume of the streams was ca. 0.84 m3 and dechlorinated tap water (5 L/min) was continuously introduced into a tile section. The top of each section was open and the recirculation system was not used. The water discharged from the tail tank was transferred to a wastewater treatment plant. This structure, with various widths and depths, realistically reflects the characteristics of actual streams and enables the use of various biological groups constituting the aquatic ecosystem for experiments.

2.2. Acclimation of Artificial Streams and Aquatic Species

Among the aquatic organisms inhabiting domestic rivers, periphytic algae, three types of invertebrate fauna, and two kinds of fish, constituting the ecosystem food chain, were selected as experimental organisms for each section of the artificial stream: tile section – periphytic algae; gravel section – M. macrocopa; pool section – Z. platypus; sediment section – G. tokunagai and L. hoffmeisteri, and tail tank – A. chinensis.
To stabilize the artificial stream, the substrate in each section was transplanted two months before the exposure experiment, and dechlorinated tap water was flowed at a rate of 5 L/min. For biological stabilization, the inoculation and stabilization times for each organism were determined based on their individual life-cycle.
Two months before the exposure experiment, sampled gravel with algae from a regional stream with similar water quality (pH: 7.54 ± 0.58; water temperature: 19.5 ± 4.0°C; nitrogen: 1.00 ± 0.32 mg-N/L; phosphorus: 0.01 ± 0.01 mg-P/L; TOC: 1.37 ± 0.63 mg/L) [26] to that of the dechlorinated tap water (pH: 7.42 ± 0.10; water temperature: 20.6 ± 0.6°C; nitrogen: 1.27 ± 0.78 mg-N/L; phosphorus: 0.01 ± 0.01 mg-P/L; TOC: 1.1 ± 0.04 mg/L), was placed on the top of the tile section to attach the periphytic algae to the sixty three unglazed ceramic tiles (7.9 cm length × 7.9 cm width). Over 70% of the tile surface in all streams was colonized by the algal community at the beginning of the experiment. The dominant algal species observed using a Leica MDG41 stereomicroscope (Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany) were Melosira varians, Microcystis viridis, and Volvox sp., respectively. These are commonly found in Korean domestic rivers [27]. M. macrocopa were cultured in the laboratory, and four animals aged < 24 h at the beginning of the experiment were introduced into each of the five cylindrical glass containers (3 cm diameter × 7 cm height), which were covered with a stainless steel mesh (80 mesh). Z. platypus and A. chinensis, 3–4 cm in length, were obtained from the Institute for Biodiversity Research and acclimated in square glass tanks for at least four weeks before the exposure experiment. On −14 d, 50 animals each of Z. platypus and A. chinensis were transferred to the pool and tail tanks. On −4 d, 10 second instar larvae of G. tokunagai, which were cultured in the laboratory, were introduced into each of a twenty five sand layer (contained in a circular stainless-steel container (9 cm diameter × 4 cm height) of sediment section. On −7 d, 10 L. hoffmeisteri obtained from an aquatic animal supplier (Alpha Fish, Yeosu, Korea), were introduced into the sediment layer (contained in a circular stainless-steel container (9 cm diameter × 4 cm height) of the sediment section. The system stabilization was confirmed by pH, dissolved oxygen (DO), conductivity, and water temperature measurements using a WTW Multi 340i portable meter with the following electrodes: For pH and temperature SenTix® 41, for DO DIN plug CellOx® 325, and for conductivity TetraCon® 325; and the biological stabilization was confirmed by monitoring the number of species in each section of the artificial stream before the exposure experiment.

2.3. Experimental Condition

The experimental conditions for benzene exposure used a stabilized artificial stream that reflected an actual structure and biological group of the river. The exposure scenario assumes that benzene enters a river directly for a period of time through a hole in a storage tank caused by a tank truck accident and then flows downstream. The concentration and time of exposure to benzene were calculated by referring to the physicochemical properties of benzene, the results of the preliminary acute toxicity test (Table S1), and the technical guidelines for accident scenario selection presented by the National Institute of Chemical Safety [28]. The detail procedures for determining the exposure scenario were described in supplementary materials. Initial exposure concentrations were 150, 330, and 726 mg/L as low, medium, and high concentrations, respectively, and the total exposure time was determined to be 4 h (Table S2). Stock solution (1.5 g/L) for exposure experiments was prepared using benzene (for HPLC analysis, purity: > 99.9%, Sigma Aldrich, USA) with an aqueous solubility of 1.88 g/L at 23.5°C. For low, medium, and high concentrations, the stock solutions of 0.5, 1.1, and 2.42 L/min were mixed with 4.5, 3.9, and 2.58 L/min of dechlorinated tap water, respectively. The mixed solution (5 L/min) was then introduced to the top of the tile section and allowed to flow downstream. Water samples were collected in triplicate at 1, 3, 5, and 24 h after start of benzene exposure and analyzed for benzene concentration using an Agilent 1200 HPLC-DAD equipped with an XBridgeTM C18 (4.6 mm inner diameter, 150 mm length, 5 μm stationary phase particle size). In the operation mobile phase: acetonitrile/water (70:30) was used at a flowrate of 1 mL/min. Water temperature, pH, DO, and conductivity (WTW Multi 304i with SenTix® 41, CellOx® 325, and TetraCon® 325) were periodically measured during the experiment.

2.4. Observations and Sample Analysis

The detail experimental conditions and biological parameters of aquatic organisms monitored in the artificial stream during the experimental period are summarized in Table S3. To identify the effect on the algal biomass, three replicate tiles were randomly sampled from the tile section on 0, 1, 7, 14, and 21 d and transferred to the laboratory. Chlorophyll-a (Chl-a) of periphytic algae as an indicator of algal biomass was analyzed using the following procedure. The periphytic algae were separated by rubbing the tile with a brush and transferred to 50 mL of distilled water. Approximately 25 mL of sample was centrifuged at 4000 × g for 20 min, and the supernatant was removed. The sample was filled with 15 mL of 90% acetone and homogenized. Then, the sample was covered with aluminum foil and dark-acclimated in a refrigerator for 24 h. After dark-acclimation, the sample was centrifuged at 4000 × g for 20 min and the supernatant was transferred to a glass vial, and the optical density (OD) at 750 nm, 664 nm, 647 nm, and 630 nm was measured using an Epoch microplate spectrophotometer (BioTek Instruments, Winooski, VT, USA). Finally, Chl-a was calculated through the following formula modified from [29]: Chl-a (mg/m2) = 11.85 × (OD664 – OD750) − 1.54 × (OD647 – OD750) − 0.08 × (OD630 – OD750) × volume of acetone (0.015 L) / volume of sample (0.025 L) × volume of total sample (0.05 L) / surface area of tile (0.087 m × 0.087 m). Mortality of adult M. macrocopa and newborn offspring was observed daily in each of the five glass containers, and the dead organisms and offspring were immediately removed. The daily mortality of Z. platypus in the pool section and A. chinensis in the tail tank was checked, and the total length and wet weight of the two fish species were measured after 30 d of the experiment to calculate the condition factor (K). Condition factor was calculated based on the following formula [30]: K = 100 × W × L3, where K = condition factor, L = fork length of fish (cm), W = body weight of fish (g). Four replicate sand and sediment samples (9 cm in diameter and 4 cm in depth) were taken from each stream at the different sampling positions. Live larvae of G. tokunagai were identified by sand sample at 0, 1, 7, 14, 28, and 36 d. The number and dry weight of L. hoffmeisteri were measured by sediment sample at 0, 1, 7, 14, 21, and 28 d.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Growth, mortality, and fecundity and water quality were assessed using statistical analyses. Normality and homogeneity of variance tests were determined using the Shapiro-Wilk test and Levene tests, respectively. If the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variance were met, One Way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and post hoc test (Dunnett's test) were performed. If the data did not meet these assumptions, the data were log-transformed and retested for normality and homogeneity of variance. Finally, if these assumptions were not met, non-parametric test (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA on Ranks test) and post hoc test (Dunn’s test) were performed. All analyses were conducted using the SigmaPlot software ver. 15 (Grafiti LLC., CA, USA). Toxicity values for no observed effect concentration (NOEC), low observed effect concentration (LOEC), median lethal concentration (LC50), and median effective concentration (EC50) were calculated using CETIS v.1.8.7.15 (Tidepool Scientific software, CA, USA). To calculate these toxicity metrics, the time-weighted average concentrations for low, medium, and high concentrations were calculated by multiplying the measured peak concentration by 4 h divided by 7 d [31].

Results and Discussion

3.1. Water Quality and Benzene Concentrations

The water quality parameters and benzene concentrations during the exposure experiments at low, medium, and high concentrations are summarized in Table S4. Throughout the experiment, temperature, dissolved oxygen (DO), pH, and conductivity remained stable across all treatments. The mean water temperatures for the control and the low, medium, and high exposure conditions were 20.9 ± 0.7°C, 20.9 ± 0.7°C, 21.0 ± 0.7°C, and 20.9 ± 0.7°C, respectively, with no statistically significant differences between control and treatments (p > 0.05). Similarly, DO levels across treatments (low 9.56 ± 0.81 mg/L, medium 9.62 ± 0.94 mg/L, high 9.60 ± 0.92 mg/L) did not significantly differ from the control (9.47 ± 0.77 mg/L) (p > 0.05). The pH and conductivity values showed no significant variations during the experiment, with mean pH values of 7.64 ± 0.32 (control), 7.71 ± 0.37 (low), 7.71 ± 0.36 (medium), and 7.73 ± 0.36 (high), and conductivity remaining constant at 125 ± 2 μS/cm across all treatments (p > 0.05).
Benzene concentrations showed a clear upward trend as the exposure concentration increased. During the exposure period, benzene concentrations ranged from 15.1 ± 1.3 to 16.7 ± 0.1 mg/L, 17.2 ± 1.0 to 22.7 ± 1.1 mg/L, and 25.0 ± 0.6 to 26.5 ± 0.8 mg/L for the low, medium, and high concentration treatments, respectively. At 5 h post-exposure, concentrations had decreased to 4.5 ± 0.1 mg/L (low), 5.8 ± 0.3 mg/L (medium), and 6.3 ± 0.2 mg/L (high), and were undetectable at 24 h. The peak benzene concentrations observed were 16.8 mg/L (low), 23.8 mg/L (medium), and 27.0 mg/L (high). The benzene concentrations identified in this study exhibited a gradual increase over time following the initial spill, reaching a peak concentration and subsequently declining after the termination of the spill. This trend is consistent with the observed changes in benzene concentrations in monitoring results and model simulations following actual benzene spills [3234]. Based on these peaks, the time-weighted average concentrations for low, medium, and high exposure were calculated as 0.40, 0.57, and 0.64 mg/L, respectively. These values were subsequently used to calculate the toxicity metrics, including NOEC, LOEC, EC50, and LC50, which are discussed in detail in later sections.

3.2. Toxic Effect on Periphytic Algae

The variation in Chl-a concentration of the periphytic algae is shown in Fig. 1. Initial Chl-a concentrations at low, medium, and high exposure levels (8.4 ± 2.8 mg/m2, 7.7 ± 2.4 mg/m2, and 4.0 ± 0.6 mg/m2, respectively) were similar to or higher than those in the control group (4.3 ± 1.8 mg/m2) (p > 0.05) (Table 1). Following benzene exposure, Chl-a concentrations at 1 d showed a slight increase at the low exposure level (6.9 ± 3.1 mg/m2), while the medium and high levels (8.4 ± 0.5 mg/m2 and 4.5 ± 1.7 mg/m2, respectively) were comparable to the control (5.3 ± 0.7 mg/m2). However, no significant differences were observed between the control and any of the treated groups (p > 0.05) (Table 1). Throughout the remainder of the experiment, Chl-a concentrations exhibited fluctuations across all treatments, but no statistically significant changes were detected compared to the control (p > 0.05).
These findings suggest that benzene did not exert any discernible impact on the growth of the periphytic algae. Due to its lower density (0.876 g/cm3 at 20°C) relative to water, benzene is able to float easily in an aqueous environment. Furthermore, the benzene quadrupole results in the formation of a partial negative charge on both faces of the π system and a partial positive charge around the aromatic ring [35, 36]. These properties reduce the probability of contact with algae that adhere to the tile surface, thereby limiting the potential for toxic effects on periphytic algae.
Previous studies have also demonstrated relatively high tolerance of algae to benzene exposure in both short-and long-term tests. The 3 h EC50 for photosynthesis in Chlamydomonas angulosa and Chlorella vulgaris was 460.9 mg/L and 312.4 mg/L, respectively [37], while the 4 h EC50 for Ankistrodesmus falcatus was 310.1 mg/L [38]. The 1 d EC50 for growth in Chlorella vulgaris was 525 mg/L [39], and the LOEC for Scenedesmus quadricauda exceeded 1,400 mg/L [40]. Additionally, in Raphidocelis subcapitata, the EC50 following an 8 d exposure was determined to be 41 mg/L [41]. Even at lower benzene concentrations (50 and 100 mg/L), slight increases in algal density and diversity were observed in small ponds [42].

3.3. Toxic Effect on Fish

The survival and condition factors of Zacco platypus and Aphyocypris chinensis after benzene exposure are presented in Fig. 2 and Table 2. The short-term exposure to benzene resulted in significant changes in the survival of Z. platypus. Within the first 4 h, survival at medium and high exposure levels dropped to 92% and 62%, respectively, indicating acute toxicity. Over the 30 d experimental period, the survival rates stabilized, with final survival at the control, low, medium, and high exposure levels being 100%, 100%, 86%, and 62%, respectively. Although initial mortality was observed, no significant differences were seen in the long-term survival rates after 1 d, suggesting that short-term exposure of benzene had an immediate but not sustained lethal effect on Z. platypus.
The condition factor of Z. platypus after 30 d showed no major variations between exposure levels, with values of 0.74 ± 0.01, 0.70 ± 0.02, 0.76 ± 0.02, and 0.74 ± 0.03 for the control, low, medium, and high exposure groups, respectively. A statistically significant reduction in condition factor was noted at the low exposure level compared to the control (p < 0.05) (Table 1), but overall, short-term benzene exposure did not appear to affect the growth of Z. platypus. This suggests that while short-term exposure led to acute mortality in Z. platypus, its growth remained unaffected by benzene.
In contrast, A. chinensis exhibited a higher tolerance to benzene exposure. No acute toxicity effects were observed within the first 24 h, with survival remaining at 100% across all exposure levels for 1 d. Survival rates at 30 d were still high, at 92%, 96%, 100%, and 94% for the control, low, medium, and high exposure groups, respectively. Condition factors at 30 d were 1.04 ± 0.04, 1.09 ± 0.07, 1.16 ± 0.09, and 1.17 ± 0.05, with a significant increase noted at the medium and high exposure levels (p < 0.05) (Table 1). However, despite the increase in condition factor, the growth of A. chinensis was not inhibited by benzene exposure, indicating that this species is less sensitive to short-term benzene toxicity compared to Z. platypus.
In this study, the 1 d NOEC and LC50 for survival in Z. platypus were determined to be 0.40 mg/L and 0.66 mg/L, respectively, showing that this species is sensitive to benzene exposure. While there was an initial mortality in response to benzene, long-term growth was not impacted, with 30 d NOEC and LOEC values for growth being 0.64 mg/L and > 0.64 mg/L, respectively. In contrast, A. chinensis exhibited greater resistance to short-term exposure in the artificial stream system, with 1 d NOEC and LOEC for survival at 0.64 mg/L and >0.64 mg/L, respectively. When comparing the results of laboratory acute toxicity tests (96 h LC50) conducted on continuous exposure to benzene for 96 h, A. chinensis (11.9 mg/L) showed a similar toxic sensitivity to that observed in Z, platypus (14.9 mg/L). However, a comparison of the toxic responses observed at 1 d revealed that mortality occurred after 2 h of benzene exposure in Z. platypus, whereas mortality occurred after 1 d of benzene exposure in A. chinensis. This suggests that A. chinensis exhibits a relatively higher resistance to the initial toxicity caused by benzene. In addition, growth inhibition of A. chinensis in the artificial stream experiment was not observed, with NOEC and LOEC for growth also at 0.64 mg/L and > 0.64 mg/L, respectively.
Previous studies have shown variability in benzene sensitivity across fish species. For example, the 1 d LC50 for Carassius auratus and Ictalurus punctatus were reported as 46 mg/L and 425 mg/L, respectively [43, 44], while for Lepomis macrochirus the values ranged from 20 to 400 mg/L [44, 45]. Oryzias latipes showed an LC50 of 70 mg/L [46], whereas Oncorhynchus mykiss was found to be the most sensitive species, with a 1 d LC50 of 9.2 mg/L [44]. The 4 d LC50 of Oncorhynchus mykiss, Pimephales promelas, and Poecilia reticulata was 5.9 mg/L [47], 24.6 mg/L [48], and 28.6 mg/L [47], respectively. These values suggest that the sensitivity of Z. platypus to benzene lies at the lower end compared to other species, while A. chinensis demonstrated a higher tolerance.
Although the bioaccumulation of benzene in fish is generally regarded as relatively low, significant variations in benzene accumulation have been documented among different fish species and organs. The bioconcentration factor (BCF) of Leuciscus idus melanotus was determined to be less than 10 when exposed to 50 μg/L of 14C-labeled benzene in a closed system for 3 d [49]. The saltwater species Clupea harrengus has the highest BCF, which was measured to be approximately 11 [50]. In contrast, exposure to 14C-labeled benzene in the marine fish species Engraulis mordax was reported to be organ-specific, with relatively high BCFs in the gallbladder (8450), intestine (505), and liver (309) [51]. Additionally, the BCFs in Morone saxatilis were observed to be lower than those in E. mordax, with the highest concentration in the gallbladder (53.4) [51]. The BCF in Clupe harengus, a marine species exposed to 14C-labeled benzene, was considerably lower than in the aforementioned two species and higher in the following organs: gallbladder (31), gills (7), intestine, pyloric cecum, brain (6), liver (5), muscle, kidney (4), and gonads (2) [52]. Furthermore, the documented mechanisms of benzene toxicity are as follows: Following the absorption of benzene into the body, it is activated by cytochrome P450 enzymes, with the toxicity-related effects of benzene being mediated by its metabolites [53]. Benzene accumulates primarily in lipid-rich tissues, where it causes hematologic toxicities such as leukopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia [54]. In particular, in fish, benzene is absorbed across the gill surface and directly into the blood, where it attaches to red blood cells, some of which attach to lipoproteins [55]. Subsequently, it is transported through the blood and accumulates in tissues or undergoes biooxidation in the liver, kidneys, and muscle tissue to form phenol, with some benzene excreted through the gills in an unconverted form [56,57].
While the mechanism of benzene toxicity is not consistent for all species, a potential toxicological mechanism for the acute effects observed in Z. platypus involves the rapid accumulation of benzene in the bloodstream through respiration, which leads to central nervous system depression, narcosis, decreased respiratory rate, acute anemia, and eventually heart failure [58, 59]. These symptoms are consistent with the observations made in this study, and similar responses have been reported in other species, including Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) and striped bass (Morone saxatilis) [59]. In contrast, A. chinensis’s resilience to benzene toxicity may be due to more efficient detoxification mechanisms. Studies have demonstrated that tolerant species tend to accumulate detoxified metabolites more effectively than sensitive species [60]. For instance, Acipenser transmontanus, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, and Salmo salar have been shown to have higher levels of detoxified metabolites compared to more sensitive species like Oncorhynchus kisutch and Salvelinus fontinalis [60]. This suggests that differences in the basal expression of biotransformation enzymes may play a role in the varying levels of benzene sensitivity observed between fish species. Further research is necessary to investigate the specific detoxification pathways in A. chinensis that may contribute to its observed tolerance to benzene exposure in this study.

3.4. Toxic Effect on Invertebrates

The survivorship and fecundity of M. macrocopa under varying benzene exposure levels are presented in Fig. S2 and S3. Mortality was not observed until 3 d (Fig. S2), but survival rates decreased significantly from 4 d to 14 d under medium and high benzene exposure, both resulting in survival rates below 60% (Fig. S2). The LC50 values for survival decreased from 1.22 mg/L at 7 d to 0.71 mg/L at 12 d, remaining constant up to 14 d (Table 3). Initial fecundity was lower in the treatment groups compared to the control (Fig. S3), with high benzene exposure significantly reducing fecundity (p < 0.05) (Table 1). The cumulative offspring per live female at 5 d in the control, low, medium, and high exposure groups were 4.4 ± 1.9, 2.0 ± 1.7, 1.7 ± 1.3, and 1.0 ± 0.7, respectively (Fig. S3). Interestingly, fecundity recovered after 8 d at the high exposure level, showing no significant difference compared to the control (p > 0.05) (Table 1). The EC50 for fecundity increased from 0.44 mg/L at 5 d to 0.66 mg/L at 8 d, and remained stable up to 14 d (Table 3). The cumulative offspring per live female at 14 d in the control, low, medium, and high exposure levels were 11.0 ± 2.4, 10.5 ± 1.3, 15.3 ± 5.0, and 10.3 ± 2.0, respectively (Fig. S3).
The mean number of G. tokunagai larvae per sample is shown in Fig. 3. The mean number of individuals per sample at 0 d in the control, low, medium, and high exposure treatments were 14.3 ± 2.2, 13.3 ± 1.5, 16.0 ± 3.8 and 12.0 ± 2.0 larvae/sample, respectively (Fig. 3). After 4 h of exposure to benzene, G. tokunagai larval numbers decreased in a concentration-dependent way. The mean number of individuals per sample at 1 d in the control, low, medium, and high exposure levels were 16.8 ± 5.6, 13.8 ± 3.8, 10.0 ± 1.2, and 9.0 ± 3.3 larvae/sample. In particular, the high exposure level resulted in a significant decrease in the mean number of individuals per sample at 1 d, 7 d, and 14 d compared to the control (p < 0.05) (Table 1). The 7 d and 14 d EC50s for mean abundance were 0.59 mg/L and 0.54 mg/L, respectively. After 14 d, the number of larvae was not significantly different from that of the control (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
The mean number of individuals per sample of L. hoffmeisteri and the dry weight of L. hoffmeisteri are shown in Fig. 4. The initial number of L. hoffmeisteri at control, low, medium, and high exposure levels were 9.5 ± 1.0, 9.8 ± 0.5, 9.3 ± 1.5, 9.5 ± 1.0 individuals/sample, respectively (Fig. 4). The number of L. hoffmeisteri under all conditions did not change up to 21 d of the experiment, and there was no significant difference between the control and treatment groups (p > 0.05) (Table 1). The mean number of individuals per sample at 28 d in the control, low, medium, and high exposure level were 9.3 ± 1.5, 13.0 ± 2.9, 9.5 ± 1.7 and 15.5 ± 1.7 individuals/sample, respectively (Fig. 4). Even though the number of L. hoffmeisteri at high exposure level was significantly higher than that of the control (p < 0.05) (Table 1), benzene did not affect the survival of L. hoffmeisteri. The initial dry weights of L. hoffmeisteri at the control, low, medium, and high exposure level were 0.81 ± 0.28, 1.07 ± 0.11, 0.68 ± 0.06, 0.73 ± 0.21 mg/individual/sample, respectively. An increase in dry weight under all conditions was observed after exposure to benzene. The dry weights at control, low, medium and high exposure level at 28 d were 0.85 ± 0.21, 1.11 ± 0.14, 0.81 ± 0.14 and 1.12 ± 0.21 mg/individual/sample, respectively (Fig. 4) and the dry weight of L. hoffmeisteri under all conditions were similar to those of the control (p > 0.05) (Table 1).
Benzene, with a low to moderate bioaccumulation potential [61], accumulates differently across trophic levels. Water fleas have a relatively high bioconcentration factor (BCF: 153–225) [62] compared to that of algae (BCF: 30) and fish (goldfish BCF: 4.3) [63]. Benzene can be accumulated in the body of Daphnia pulex, and after 72 h, 15% of the accumulated benzene still remains in the body [62]. PAHs, including benzene, are narcotic chemicals that accumulate in the lipid bilayer of cells [64] and can cause toxicity if certain concentration thresholds are met. The observed decrease in survivorship and fecundity of M. macrocopa can be attributed to the bioaccumulation of benzene and its metabolites, which likely led to the activation of cytochrome P450 enzymes, resulting in DNA mutations and eventual mortality [64,65]. The recovery of fecundity in later stages suggests that benzene and its metabolites were metabolized and eliminated from the body over time, reducing the toxic effects. Similar toxic effects have been observed in G. tokunagai, where the absence of cytochrome P450 CYP6EV11 gene expression has been linked to increased mortality [66]. L. hoffmeisteri's tolerance to benzene, with 48 h LC50 of 6638 mg/L, suggests a higher resistance compared to other species [67,68]. These findings demonstrate that benzene's toxic effects on invertebrates are species-dependent, influenced by bioaccumulation potential and metabolic activity.

3.5. Sentinel Species

Episodic benzene pollution in freshwater environments poses a significant concern for both ecosystem and human health, though its effects are not yet fully understood. Most existing studies focus on continuous benzene exposure in laboratory conditions [12,4345,48,58], while field studies investigating the impacts of episodic pollution events on aquatic organisms are scarce. In Korea, field assessments following episodic pollution typically rely on the identification of dead fish and the effects of water samples on daphnids [69], leaving a gap in understanding the broader effects of temporary benzene exposure on aquatic life.
In this study, artificial stream experiments were conducted with minimal variation in environmental conditions to simulate real-stream scenarios. This approach allowed for the observation of benzene's fate in freshwater ecosystems and its toxic effects on aquatic species across different trophic levels. Our results revealed differences in susceptibility among species, providing insight into their potential as sentinel species for detecting benzene pollution. Z. platypus was the most sensitive species during the initial exposure period, showing high vulnerability to benzene. Delayed toxicity effects were observed in increased mortality and decreased fecundity in M. macrocopa and decreased abundance in G. tokunagai. Notably, M. macrocopa showed signs of reproductive recovery following toxic effects.
These findings suggest that Z. platypus could serve as an early sentinel species for detecting benzene spills, while M. macrocopa and G. tokunagai could be effective in monitoring delayed toxic effects.

3.6. Limitations and Future Directions

This study utilized an artificial stream system to assess the toxic effects of short-term benzene exposure on various aquatic species. However, several limitations exist, and future research directions are suggested based on these limitations.
  • Limited experimental environment: While artificial streams are effective for assessing benzene toxicity, they may not fully capture the complex variability of natural ecosystems. In real aquatic environments, factors such as temperature, pH, and flow rate vary constantly, affecting the diffusion and breakdown of benzene. Future studies should consider outdoor experiments like mesocosm that better reflect these environmental variables.

  • Exclusion of interspecies interactions: This study focused on individual species responses; however, interspecies interactions play a significant role in pollutant dispersion and toxic responses within ecosystems. Future research should incorporate predator-prey relationships, competition, and other interactions to more accurately assess benzene’s ecosystem-level impact.

  • Limited exposure concentrations and durations: The benzene concentrations and exposure duration used in this study may not fully represent real environmental contamination events. Additional studies that incorporate various concentrations and longer exposure times would help to assess chronic toxicity and sublethal effects of benzene in aquatic systems.

  • Lack of recovery potential assessment: Although some species showed recovery potential, this study did not include long-term monitoring to evaluate recovery at the ecosystem level. Future research should address ecosystem resilience and long-term ecological impacts after benzene contamination.

  • Limited inclusion of diverse biological groups: This study focused on specific aquatic taxa; thus, it does not provide a complete understanding of benzene’s impact on freshwater ecosystems. Including additional biological groups, such as bacteria and phytoplankton, would offer a more comprehensive view of benzene’s ecological effects.

  • Lack of functional ecosystem impact assessment: Evaluating toxic responses beyond individual survival and reproduction, such as ecosystem functions and community structures, is essential. Further studies are needed to examine how reductions in key species affect energy flow and trophic interactions within ecosystems.

This study offers baseline data for acute benzene toxicity and highlights species with potential as environmental indicators, laying groundwork for further research and monitoring strategies.

Conclusions

This study is the first to evaluate the toxic effects of short-term benzene exposure on various aquatic species using an artificial stream system. Among fish, Zacco platypus exhibited high sensitivity with acute toxicity effects, while the invertebrates Moina macrocopa and Glyptotendipes tokunagai showed delayed toxic responses with reductions in survival and fecundity. These findings suggest that benzene spills could lead to structural changes in freshwater ecosystems, emphasizing the need for rapid mitigation measures from an environmental standpoint. This study contributes to benzene contamination monitoring and management by highlighting species-specific toxic responses and identifying potential sentinel species. Future research should focus on elucidating the mechanisms of species-specific toxicity, while larger-scale experiments, such as outdoor mesocosms, are needed to assess community- or ecosystem-level impacts through bioaccumulation and food chain interactions. Such studies will provide a comprehensive understanding of the long-term ecological impacts of benzene contamination and support effective environmental management strategies.

Supplementary Information

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Korea Environmental Industry & Technology Institute (KEITI) through the Aquatic Ecosystem Health Technology Development Project funded by Korea Ministry of Environment (MOE) (No. RS-2022-KE02211).

Notes

Conflict-of-Interest Statement

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author Contributions

S.P. (Ph.D.) conceptualized, researched, collected and analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript; S.L. (Ph.D.) collected and analyzed the data; and D.H.Y. (Ph.D.) supervised, validated, and reviewed the manuscript. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the Guidelines for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in Korea, and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the Korea Institute of Toxicology, Jinju, Korea (KIT-IACUC approval number: 2009-0007).

References

1. Bondžić J, Sremački M, Popov S, Mihajlović I, Vujić B, Petrović M. Exposure to hazmat road accidents–Toxic release simulation and GIS-based assessment method. J. Environ. Manage. 2021;293:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112941
crossref pmid

2. Wang B, Wu C, Reniers G, Huang L, Kang L, Zhang L. The future of hazardous chemical safety in China: Opportunities, problems, challenges and tasks. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;643:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.174
crossref pmid

3. Jeong JU, Lee SJ. Analysis on the Characteristics of Hazardous Chemical Transport Vehicle Accidents in Korea. J. Soc. Disaster Information. 2020;16:310–317. https://doi.org/10.15683/kosdi.2020.06.30.310
crossref

4. Pathak B, Gupta S, Fulekar MH. Biodegradation of benzene under anaerobic condition. Biodegradation and Bioconversion of Hydrocarbons. Singapore: Springer; 2017. p. 163–204.
crossref pmid

5. Niziolek AM, Onel O, Floudas CA. Production of benzene, toluene, and the xylenes from natural gas via methanol. Comput. Aided Chem. Eng. 2016;38:2349–2354. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63428-3.50396-9
crossref

6. McHale CM, Zhang L, Smith MT. Current understanding of the mechanism of benzene-induced leukemia in humans: implications for risk assessment. Carcinogenesis. 2012;33:240–252. https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgr297
crossref pmid pmc

7. Xu J, Zheng L, Yan Z, et al. Effective extrapolation models for ecotoxicity of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene (BTEX). Chemosphere. 2020;240:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124906
crossref pmid

8. Bone AJ, Matson CW, Colman BP, Yang X, Meyer JN, Di Giulio RT. Silver nanoparticle toxicity to Atlantic killifish (Fundulus heteroclitus) and Caenorhabditis elegans: A comparison of mesocosm, microcosm, and conventional laboratory studies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2015;34:275–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.2806
crossref pmid

9. Lamberti GA, Steinman AD. Research in artificial streams: applications, uses, and abuses. J. North Am. Benthol. Soc. 1993;12:313–384. https://doi.org/10.2307/1467618
crossref

10. Lott C, Eich A, Unger B, Makarow D, Battagliarin G, Schlegel K, Lasut MT, Weber M. Field and mesocosm methods to test biodegradable plastic film under marine conditions. PLoS One. 2020;15:1–26. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236579
crossref pmid pmc

11. Clements WH, Carlisle DM, Courtney LA, Harrahy EA. Integrating observational and experimental approaches to demonstrate causation in stream biomonitoring studies. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2002;21:1138–1146. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620210605
crossref pmid

12. Santos-Medrano GE, Rico-Martínez R. Acute sensitivity comparison among Daphnia magna Straus, 1820 Daphnia pulex Leydig, 1860 and Simocephalus vetulus Müller, 1776, exposed to nine toxicants. Turk. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 2019;19:615–623. https://doi.org/10.4194/1303-2712-v19_7_08
crossref pmid

13. Rinderhagen M, Ritterhoff J, Zauke GP. Crustaceans as bioindicators. Biomonitoring of polluted water: Reviews on actual topics. Zurich: Trans Tech Pubs; 2000. p. 161–194.


14. Petrusek A. Moina (Crustacea: Anomopoda, Moinidae) in the Czech Republic: A Review. Acta Soc. Zool. Bohem. 2002;66:213–220.


15. Chu KH, Wong CK, Chiu KC. Effects of the insect growth regulator (S)-methoprene on survival and reproduction of the freshwater cladoceran Moina macrocopa . Environ. Pollut. 1997;96:173–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(97)00030-4
crossref pmid

16. Sasa M. Chironomidae of Japan: Checklist of species recorded, key to males and taxonomic notes. Research Report from the National Institute for Environmental Studies, Japan No 125. Tsukuba: National Institute for Environmental Studies; 1989. p. 1–177.


17. Lee JH, Lee SH, Bae YJ, et al. Assessment techniques for ecological effects on heavy metal pollution using invertebrate biomarkers. Seoul: Jeonghaengsa;. 2009;1–90.


18. Baek MJ, Yoon TJ, Bae YJ. Development of Glyptotendipes tokunagai (Diptera: Chironomidae) under different temperature conditions. Environ. Entomol. 2012;41:950–958. https://doi.org/10.1603/EN11286
crossref

19. Jung JW. Naidid oligochaetes (Annelida: Clitellata) from the Seokhyeoncheon and Changreungcheon Streams with new record of Nais variabilis. Korean J. Ecol. Environ. 2011;44:407–410.


20. Lin KJ, Yo SP. The effect of organic pollution on the abundance and distribution of aquatic oligochaetes in an urban water basin, Taiwan. Hydrobiologia. 2008;596:213–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-007-9098-x
crossref

21. Kang H, Bae MJ, Park YS. Behavioral response of Tubifex to changes of water temperature and substrate composition. Korean J. Ecol. Environ. 2017;50:355–361. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2017.50.3.355
crossref

22. Wang JH, Park HJ, Park JH, et al. Comparison of the habitat distribution characteristics of Aquatic Oligochaeta according to the construction of weirs in four major rivers in South Korea. Korean J. Environ. Biol. 2019;37:607–617. https://doi.org/10.11626/KJEB.2019.37.4.607
crossref

23. Olguín HF, Salibián A, Puig A. Comparative sensitivity of Scenedesmus acutus and Chlorella pyrenoidosa as sentinel organisms for aquatic ecotoxicity assessment: studies on a highly polluted urban river. Environ. Toxicol. 2000;15:14–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1522-7278(2000)15:1<14::AID-TOX3>3.0.CO;2-6
crossref

24. Yoon JD, Kim JH, Park SH, Jang MH. The distribution and diversity of freshwater fishes in Korean Peninsula. Korean J. Ecol. Environ. 2018;51:71–85. https://doi.org/10.11614/KSL.2018.51.1.071
crossref

25. Kim IS. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna and Flora of Korea. Vol. 37. Freshwater Fishes. Korea: Ministry of Education; 1997. p. 1–629.


26. Ministry of Environment. Water Environment Information System [Internet]. C2024. [cited 6 September 2024]. Available from: https://water.nier.go.kr/web/waterMeasure?pMENU_NO=2


27. Chung IK, Kim NL, Song EH, Lee JE, Lee SR. Literature survey on the phytoplankton flora in the Nakdong River estuary, Korea. Korean J. Fish Aquat. Sci. 2013;46:467–487. https://doi.org/10.5657/KFAS.2013.0467
crossref

28. NICS. Guidelines for Accident Scenario Selection. Cheongju: National Institute of Chemical Safety; 2014. p. 1–15.


29. Amri N, Jamili S, Shahidian M. A study on the primary production of the périphyton epilithics and biomass macrobenthos in Kordian river (North West of Iran). Int. J. Ecosyst. 2014;4:75–82. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ije.20140402.05
crossref

30. Tullio SCMC, McCoy K, Chalcraft DR. Chronic toxicity and liver histopathology of mosquito fish (Gambusia holbrooki) exposed to natural and modified nanoclays. Sci. Total Environ. 2024;908:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.168060
crossref pmid

31. Wolf Y, Gabsi F, Bruns E, et al. TWAc-check: A new approach to determine the appropriate use of time-weighted average concentration in aquatic risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2002;41:1778–1787. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5346
crossref pmid pmc

32. Lyu L. Simulation of sudden benzene leakage water pollution events. In : International Conference on Air Pollution and Environmental Engineering (APEE 2018); 26–28 October 2018; Hong Kong. p. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/208/1/012035
crossref

33. Guo G, Cheng G. Mathematical modelling and application for simulation of water pollution accidents. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019;127:189–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2019.05.012
crossref

34. Jin G, Zhang Z, Yang Y, Hu S, Tang H, Barry DA, Li L. Mitigation of impact of a major benzene spill into a river through flow control and in-situ activated carbon absorption. Water Res. 2020;172:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2020.115489
crossref pmid

35. Ghernaout B, Ghernaout D, Saiba A. Algae and cyanotoxins removal by coagulation/flocculation: A review. Desalin. Water Treat. 2010;20:133–143. https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2010.1202
crossref

36. Dhotel A, Chen Z, Delbreilh L, Youssef B, Saiter JM, Tan L. Molecular motions in functional self-assembled nanostructures. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013;14:2303–2333. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14022303
crossref pmid pmc

37. Hutchinson TC, Hellebust JA, Tam D, Mackay D, Mascarenhas RA, Shiu WY. The correlation of the toxicity to algae of hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons with their physical-chemical properties. Hydrocarbons and Halogenated Hydrocarbons in the Aquatic Environment. Boston: Springer; 1980. p. 577–586.
crossref pmid

38. Wong PTS, Chau YK, Rhamey JS, Docker M. Relationship between water solubility of chlorobenzenes and their effects on a freshwater green alga. Chemosphere. 1984;13:991–996. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(84)90058-4
crossref

39. Kauss PB, Hutchinson TC. The effects of water-soluble petroleum components on the growth of Chlorella vulgaris Beijerinck. Environ. Pollut. (1970). 1975;9:157–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-9327(75)90033-6
crossref

40. Bringmann G, Kühn R. Comparison of the toxicity thresholds of water pollutants to bacteria, algae, and protozoa in the cell multiplication inhibition test. Water Res. 1980;14:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(80)90093-7
crossref

41. Herman DC, Inniss WE, Mayfield CI. Impact of volatile aromatic hydrocarbons, alone and in combination, on growth of the freshwater alga Selenastrum capricornutum . Aquat. Toxicol. 1990;18:87–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(90)90020-P
crossref

42. Lay JP, Schauerte W, Peichl L, Klein W, Korte F. Influence of benzene on the phytoplankton and on Daphnia pulex in compartments of an experimental pond. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1985;10:218–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(85)90069-7
crossref pmid

43. Bridie AL, Wolff CJM, Winter M. The acute toxicity of some petrochemicals to goldfish. Water Res. 1979;13:623–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(79)90010-1
crossref

44. Mayer FL, Ellersieck MR. Manual of acute toxicity: interpretation and data base for 410 chemicals and 66 species of freshwater animals (No 160). Columbia: US Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, USA; 1986. p. 1–506.


45. Turnbull H, DeMann JG, Weston RF. Toxicity of various refinery materials to fresh water fish. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1954;46:324–333. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50530a035
crossref

46. Tsuji S, Tonogai Y, Ito Y, Kanoh S. The influence of rearing temperatures on the toxicity of various environmental pollutants for killifish(Oryzias latipes). J. Hyg. Chem. 1986;32:46–53. https://doi.org/10.1248/jhs1956.32.46
crossref

47. Galassi S, Mingazzini M, Vigano L, Cesareo D, Tosato ML. Approaches to modeling toxic responses of aquatic organisms to aromatic hydrocarbons. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1988;16:158–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-6513(88)90030-9
crossref pmid

48. Marchini S, Tosato ML, Norberg-King TJ, Hammermeister DE, Hoglund MD. Lethal and sublethal toxicity of benzene derivatives to the fathead minnow, using a short-term test. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1992;11:187–195. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620110208
crossref

49. Freitag D, Ballhorn L, Geyer H, Korte F. Environmental hazard profile of organic chemicals: An experimental method for the assessment of the behaviour of organic chemicals in the ecosphere by means of simple laboratory tests with 14C labelled chemicals. Chemosphere. 1985;14:1589–1616. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(85)90014-1
crossref

50. Eldridge MB, Echeverria T, Korn S. Fate of 14C-benzene in eggs and larvae of Pacific herring (Clupea harengus pallasi). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1978;35:861–865. https://doi.org/10.1139/f78-137
crossref

51. Korn S, Hirsch N, Struhsaker JW. Uptake, distribution, and depuration of 14 C-benzene in northern anchovy, Engraulis mordax, and striped bass, Morone saxatilis . Fish. Bull. 1976;74:545–552.


52. Korn S, Hirsch N, Struhsaker JW. The Uptake, Distribution and Depuration of 14C-Benzene and 14C-Toluene in Pacific Herring, Clupea Harengus Pallasi. Fish. Bull. 1977;75:633–636. https://spo.nmfs.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/pdf-content/fish-bull/korn.pdf


53. Snyder R, Hedli CC. An overview of benzene metabolism. Environ. Health Perspect. 1996;104:1165–1171. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.961041165
crossref pmid pmc

54. Rothman N, Smith MT, Hayes RB, et al. An epidemiologic study of early biologic effects of benzene in Chinese workers. Environ. Health Perspect. 1996;104:1365–1370. https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.961041365
crossref pmid pmc

55. Gerarde HW. Toxicology and Biochemistry of Aromatic Hydrocarbons. New York: Elsevier Publ. Co; 1960. p. 1–329.


56. Parke DV. The biochemistry of foreign compounds. Oxford: Permagon Press; 1968. p. 1–318.


57. Harper H. Review of physiological chemistry. 11 edLos Altos: Lange Medical Publications; 1967. p. 1–541.


58. Meyerhoff RD. Acute toxicity of benzene, a component of crude oil, to juvenile striped bass (Morone saxatilis). J. Fish. Res. Board Can. 1975;32:1864–1866. https://doi.org/10.1139/f75-223
crossref

59. Brocksen RW, Bailey HT. Respiratory response of juvenile chinook salmon and striped bass exposed to benzene, a water-soluble component of crude oil. In : Joint Conference on Prevention and Control of Oil Spills; 13–15 March 1973; Washington, DC. p. 783–791. https://doi.org/10.7901/2169-3358-1973-1-783
crossref

60. Montgomery D, Ji X, Cantin J, et al. Interspecies differences in 6PPD-quinone toxicity across seven fish species: Metabolite identification and semiquantification. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023;57:21071–21079. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.3c06891
crossref pmid

61. David V, Moldoveanu SC. Variation with temperature of octanol/water partition coefficient for the homologous series from benzene to propylbenzene. Sep. Sci. Plus. 2019;2:457–464. https://doi.org/10.1002/sscp.201900033
crossref

62. Trucco RG, Engelhardt FR, Stacey B. Toxicity, accumulation and clearance of aromatic hydrocarbons in Daphnia pulex . Environ. Pollut. A. 1983;31:191–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/0143-1471(83)90076-4
crossref

63. Geyer H, Politzki G, Freitag D. Prediction of ecotoxicological behaviour of chemicals: Relationship between n-octanol/water partition coefficient and bioaccumulation of organic chemicals by alga. Chlorella Chemosphere. 1984;13:269–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/0045-6535(84)90134-6
crossref

64. Ha H, Park K, Kang G, Lee S. QSAR study using acute toxicity of Daphnia magna and Hyalella azteca through exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Ecotoxicol. 2019;28:333–342. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-019-02025-1
crossref pmid

65. Parkinson A, Ogilvie BW, Buckley DB, Kazmi F, Parkinson O. Biotransformation of xenobiotics Casarett & Doull’s toxicology: the basic science of poisons. New York: McGraw-Hill; 2019. p. 193–430.


66. Zhang Q, Chu D, Sun L, Cao C. Cytochrome P450 CYP6EV11 in Chironomus kiiensis larvae involved in phenol stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041119
crossref pmid pmc

67. Liu YN, Fan XM, Kan XW, Zhai ZH. Effect of benzene, phenol, and nitrobenzene on Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri acute toxicity and superoxide dismutase activity. Acta Hydrobiol. Sin. 2008;32:420–423. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1035.2008.00420
crossref

68. Slooff W. Benthic macroinvertebrates and water quality assessment: some toxicological considerations. Aquat. Toxicol. 1983;4:73–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-445X(83)90062-0
crossref

69. Ministry of Environment. Large-Scale Water Pollution Crisis Response Practical Manual. Sejong: Ministry of Environment; 2019. p. 1–244.


Fig. 1
Variation in periphyton Chl-a over the experimental periods. The error bars indicate the standard deviation (±SD) of the mean.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2024-540f1.gif
Fig. 2
Survival of two fish species, (a) Zacco platypus and (b) Aphyocypris chinensis, over the experimental periods.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2024-540f2.gif
Fig. 3
Mean number of Glyptotendipes tokunagai over the experimental periods. The error bars indicate the standard deviation (±SD) of the mean. The asterisk represents a statistically significant difference from the control (p < 0.05).
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2024-540f3.gif
Fig. 4
(a) Mean number and (b) mean dry weight of Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri over the experimental periods. The error bars indicate the standard deviation (±SD) of the mean. The asterisk represents a statistically significant difference from the control (p < 0.05).
/upload/thumbnails/eer-2024-540f4.gif
Table 1
One Way Analysis of Variance results for the effect of benzene concentrations in periphyton Chl-a, condition factor of Zacco platensis and Aphyocypris chinensis, reproduction of Moina macrocopa, mean number of Glyptotendipes tokunagai, and mean number and mean dry weight of Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri
Species Endpoint Time (d) DF Statistic Significance Post-hoc test
Periphytic algae Chl-a 0 3 F = 3.749 p = 0.060
1 3 F = 2.596 p = 0.125
7 3 F = 3.053 p = 0.092
14 3 F = 1.565 p = 0.272
21 3 F = 0.548 p = 0.663

Moina macrocopa Reproduction 5 3 H = 9.704 p = 0.021 Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 0.519, Control vs Medium: p = 0.080, Control vs High: p = 0.010
Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 0.519, Control vs Medium: p = 0.173, Control vs High: p = 0.007
Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 0.719, Control vs Medium: p = 0.207, Control vs High: p = 0.008
6 3 H = 9.606 p = 0.022
7 3 H = 9.421 p = 0.024
8 3 H = 6.874 p = 0.076
10 3 H = 2.877 p = 0.411
14 3 H = 3.236 p = 0.357

Zacco platypus Condition factor 30 3 F = 9.484 p < 0.001 Dunnett’s test, Control vs Low: p = 0.007, Control vs Medium: p = 0.059, Control vs High: p = 0.982

Aphyocypris chinensis Condition factor 30 3 F = 8.326 p < 0.001 Dunnett’s test, Control vs Low: p = 0.447, Control vs Medium: p < 0.001, Control vs High: p < 0.001

Glyptotendipes tokunagai Mean number 0 3 H = 5.051 p = 0.168 Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 1.000, Control vs Medium: p = 0.103, Control vs High: p = 0.047
Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 0.508, Control vs Medium: p = 0.039, Control vs High: p = 0.003
Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 1.000, Control vs Medium: p = 0.064, Control vs High: p = 0.011
1 3 H = 8.308 p = 0.040
7 3 H = 12.165 p = 0.007
14 3 H = 11.881 p = 0.008
28 3 H = 5.031 p = 0.170
36 3 H = 5.422 p = 0.143

Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri Mean number 0 3 H = 0.086 p = 0.993 Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 1.000, Control vs Medium: p = 0.845, Control vs High: p = 0.263
Dunn’s test, Control vs Low: p = 0.384, Control vs Medium: p = 1.000, Control vs High: p = 0.025
1 3 H = 1.154 p = 0.764
7 3 H = 6.400 p = 0.094
14 3 H = 2.221 p = 0.528
21 3 H = 8.348 p = 0.039
28 3 H = 9.456 p = 0.024

Limnodrilus hoffmeisteri Mean dry weight 0 3 F = 3.029 p = 0.071
1 3 F = 1.825 p = 0.196
7 3 F = 3.307 p = 0.057
14 3 F = 1.065 p = 0.400
21 3 F = 2.428 p = 0.116
28 3 F = 3.138 p = 0.065
Table 2
Condition factor of Zacco platypus and Aphyocypris chinensis at 30 d
Species Condition factor (mean ± SD)
Control Low Medium High
Zacco platypus 0.74 ± 0.05 0.70 ± 0.06* 0.76 ± 0.05 0.74 ± 0.06
Aphyocypris chinensis 1.05 ± 0.13 1.09 ± 0.28 1.16 ± 0.15* 1.17 ± 0.13*

The asterisk represents a statistically significant difference from the control (p < 0.05).

Table 3
LC50 and EC50 values for the survival and reproduction of Moina macrocopa after benzene exposure
Endpoint LC50 (95% confidence limits) (mg/L)
7 d 8 d 12 d 13 d 14 d
Survival 1.22 (NA*) 0.82 (0.36–1.87) 0.71 (0.54–0.93) 0.69 (0.53–0.91) 0.72 (0.49–1.06)
Endpoint EC50 (95% confidence limits) (mg/L)
5 d 6 d 7 d 8 d 9 d 10 d 14 d
Reproduction 0.44 (0.28–0.68) 0.54 (0.41–0.71) 0.57 (0.44–0.74) 0.66 (0.52–0.82) 0.66 (NA*) >0.64 >0.64

Not available

TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplement  Supplement
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
0
Scopus
806
View
14
Download
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers