AbstractThe hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process is a promising green technology for reducing and reusing sewage sludge and can be a powerful tool against the current problems of energy scarcity, climate imbalance, and environmental pollution. Despite its admirable robustness, HTC can be easily tuned by controlling temperature and reaction time, as well as by biomass:water mass ratio and pH. The systematized knowledge of the relationship between these parameters is fundamental to successful innovative research aiming at scaling up the process. In this review, a bibliometric analysis based on ten years of scientific publications was carried out. The PRISMA guidelines were adopted to select forty-seven works as a source of information and critical discussion on key findings of reactions performed in high-pressure reactors. The global scientific community is mainly concerned with solid products (hydrochar) and the study of mechanisms of removal/adsorption of nutrients, minerals, and pollutants. The gaseous phase is in the background, opening up numerous research possibilities. Future outlooks are focused on coupling HTC with biorefineries to strengthen the valorization of sewage sludge, contribute to the production of biofuels and biofertilizers, and benefit communities currently without access to environmental sanitation.
Graphical Abstract1. IntroductionWorldwide, wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) operate at full steam, serving countless people and producing thousands of tons of sewage sludge daily, which demands adequate disposal [1]. According to global statistics, it is estimated that more than 45 million dry tons of sewage sludge are produced per year, with Europe, Eastern Asia, and North America appearing as the most prominent producers [2,3].
The treatment of sewage sludge is considered a crucial issue in terms of quality of life and is closely aligned with United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goals [4]. In addition to its high volume, another concern regarding this type of residue is due to its significant content of embedded pollutants, such as heavy metals, arsenic, pharmaceuticals, an excessive nutrient load (nitrogen and phosphorus), and massive presence of pathogenic microorganisms, e.g. thermostable coliforms and salmonella [5]. Unfortunately, there is a worst-case scenario that is quite common in underdeveloped and developing countries: a significant portion of citizens are not covered by a sanitation program and have their domestic sewage released directly into the environment, which becomes a relevant problem of public health, demanding consistent actions from decision makers [6].
1.1. Hydrothermal CarbonizationHydrothermal carbonization (HTC) has emerged as an innovative technology for sewage treatment, simplifying conventional processes used in many countries. It is a thermo-chemical process that operates with water under subcritical conditions, that is, temperature below 374°C and pressure below 221 bar, usually ranging from 180 to 250°C and 6 to 12 bar [7,8]. HTC is considered a robust process due to its flexibility regarding the vast types of wet biomass used as raw material. In addition to sewage sludge, HTC is capable of processing other types of biomass in a single or combined arrangement, such as municipal solid waste [9], manure [10], vinasse [11], waste food [12], algae [13], olive bagasse [14], sawdust [15], organic residue [16], and lignocellulosic biomass [17]. The possibility of co-processing of different sources is a striking feature of this technology, and this modality has been named co-hydrothermal carbonization (co-HTC), which allows it to exploit new horizons through the study of synergistic effects resulting from the combination of, for example, biomass and non-renewable carbon-based sources [18,20].
HTC process can even be applied in the treatment of primary sewage [21–23], which could contribute to a decrease in demand for conventional processes based on anaerobic and aerobic digestion, allowing the waste to be valued and reinforcing aspects of the circular economy that involves this type of biomass. Both typical primary and secondary sewage can be considered a rich renewable source of biomass for different application possibilities, including nutrient recovery and a starting point for clean energy production [3,9–11,24]. Currently, the most commonly used methods for domestic sewage treatment include a long and expensive route within WWTPs, followed by sludge disposal in landfills. Sludge incineration, as well as the use of stabilized sludge in soil amendment, have also been adopted in some countries (Fig. S1) [7,25,26]. However, these methods may present unsustainable costs primarily owing to the high moisture content (80–85wt.%) remaining after mechanical filtration, which implies stabilization procedures, thickening, dehydration and drying, aiming at increasing its calorific value, lower transport costs, among others [27,28].
According to the literature, sewage sludge management is responsible for approximately 50 to 60% of the total operational costs in a WWTP [29]. Therefore, the investigation and development of innovative, efficient, and sustainable technologies have an important role in increasing the accessibility of vulnerable communities to a minimum basic sanitation condition.
One of the reasons that makes the HTC process a promising technology for sewage sludge treatment is that the water is a necessary input; therefore, previous drying, dehydration, or other thermo-chemical steps are disregarded [30]. Under these conditions, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose that comprise the biomass source undergo degradation to produce the hydrochar through a series of chemical reactions, such as, hydrolysis, dehydration, decarboxylation, condensation, polymerization, and aromatization [31]. These reactions are intimately related to temperature and time, in which the increase in the temperature usually speeds up the degradation process and the polymerization of the sewage sludge, while lower temperatures activate the depolymerization process. The variation in reaction time impacts the distribution of the products formed during condensation, polymerization, and aromatization [32,33]. Fig. 1 depicts the main chemical reactions involved in HTC of a cellulose-based biomass.
In addition to water friendliness, another reason that favors HTC as a potential technology for domestic sewage treatment is its ability to generate different bioproducts in solid, liquid and gaseous phases, which is a very welcome feature to connect HTC to other industrial processes and improve sustainability aspects. Some of the potential applications of these products are detailed in the following section.
1.2. Potential Applications of HTC ProductsIn recent years, interest in HTC products has increased significantly among researchers and some industrial sectors. The specific conditions of the HTC process give hydrochar unique characteristics, such as high surface area, pore volume and size, stability, and the presence of reactive functional groups on its surface. In addition, the resulting aqueous phase is rich in nutrients, but may contain significant levels of pollutants; whereas the gaseous phase has a characteristic composition based primarily on carbon dioxide. These products have been widely studied for nutrient recovery for agricultural use and soil amendment, for alternative adsorbents, and for biofuels production. Table S1 shows other potential uses for these products as reported in literature.
1.2.1. Nutrient source and soil amendmentHydrochars generally contain essential nutrients such as nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium and magnesium, and can be used as slow-release biofertilizers, especially on infertile soils. However, the effectiveness of hydrochars in agriculture depends significantly on the type of raw material and the experimental conditions of the HTC process [34]. Hydrochars can increase the plant-available water capacity (AWC) due to its ability to retain water in their pores [35]. Moreover, it can improve highly weathered soils with unfavorable chemical properties, such as high electrical conductivity, low cation exchange capacity, and low organic carbon [36,37]. Nevertheless, the use of hydrochars in agriculture presents challenges that must be considered.
In some cases, hydrochars can decrease plant growth due to adverse effects on soil properties, such as an increase in the C/N ratio and a decrease in pH, resulting in greater microbial immobilization of nitrogen and lower nitrogen absorption by plants. These adverse effects can be intensified by inherent contaminants, such as heavy metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), phenols, and furfurals [34]. Hydrochars produced at high HTC temperature (>260°C) can be phytotoxic, reducing shoot growth by up to 30%, although it does not affect seedling emergence. Conversely, hydrochars produced at low HTC temperature (170–200°C) can induce nutrient deficiency due to the immobilization of essential ones [38]. In this sense, some alternatives have been explored and discussed to mitigate the phytotoxicity of the solid HTC product [39], such as natural aging of the hydrochar, allowing microbial decomposition of germination-inhibiting substances [40], washing with water or organic solvents, which can remove some of these inhibiting substances [41], and modification of the hydrochar to immobilize heavy metals, which although it does not improve the germination rate, can indirectly promote crop growth [42].
The valorization of the liquid phase on HTC process presents considerable challenges, although recent research has indicated its potential as a liquid biofertilizer [43,44]. However, detailed chemical characterization and exploration of possible applications for the HTC liquid phase are still scarce in the literature [45]. This liquid phase contains a high concentration of soluble organic compounds and nutrients, particularly ammonia-nitrogen and potassium, showing its potential use in producing organic liquid fertilizers [46,47].
Due to the high concentration of potassium and nitrogen (especially in the form of ammonium ion), but with lower amounts of phosphorus and heavy metals, the liquid phase presents itself as a potential nitrogen and potassium compound fertilizer, which can be adjusted to meet the specific needs of various plants and types of soil [46]. However, as the severity of the HTC reaction increases (mainly temperature and time), the presence of toxic intermediates, such as aldehydes, phenols, and furans, as well as heterocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, can restrict its direct application to the soil due to its phytotoxicity and offensive odor [48]. In this sense, some post-treatments can be used to remove these undesirable substances, such as washing and fermentation [46].
Although fewer studies have directly evaluated the impact of applying the liquid phase of HTC on plant growth, their results suggest that it is necessary to identify the correct dilution ratio. The dilution ratio must balance the prevention of phytotoxicity with the adequate supply of essential nutrients for plant germination, growth, and development [44]. Consequently, continued research, as well as development of effective methods for the recovery of the liquid and solid phases of HTC are crucial to maximizing the use of the resources present in sewage sludge, promoting more sustainable agricultural practices or soil amendment, and reducing the environmental impacts associated with the inappropriate disposal of this waste.
1.2.2. AdsorptionHTC and co-HTC of sewage sludge have become viable techniques for producing efficient adsorbents. However, process conditions such as temperature, reaction time, pH, mass ratio, and adding additives play a fundamental role in modifying physical and chemical properties of the hydrochars, directly affecting their adsorption performance [49]. Several studies have reported findings in the production of adsorbents. For instance, Montaño et al. [50] presented an innovative approach, producing highly effective materials for biogas desulfurization. Optimal conditions, such as pH 2.6, reaction time of 180 min, and temperature of 230°C, were identified as the most favorable for maximizing the adsorption performance of the produced hydrochars. Huang et al. [60] observed that pH was one of the most determining factors influencing the surface charge of the adsorbent, the degree of ionization, and the types of adsorbed ions. In addition, they found that introducing citric acid during the HTC experiments using sewage sludge can significantly increase the porosity, the number of functional groups on the surface, and the thermal and chemical stability of the resulting material, increasing adsorption efficiency.
The effects of temperature and residence time of the HTC process on the production of these adsorbents have also been reported. Wang et al. [49] demonstrated that the amount of adsorption of pollutants such as tetracycline and methylene blue decreases with increasing HTC temperature (180–260°C), and only a slight decrease was observed when prolonged reaction times (2–6 h) were used. This result is consistent with those reported by Cheng et al. [51], which showed that increasing the reaction temperature is associated with an increase in the specific surface area and pore volume of hydrochars, improving adsorption capacities.
The water/biomass ratio has also been highlighted in the literature as an influence on the textural and surface properties of hydrochars. Studies have highlighted that this ratio significantly influences the formation of a hydrophilic surface, which is essential for the adsorption of iron ions in acidic conditions [52]. In addition, Ebrahim et al. [53] identified optimum parameters, such as 180°C, 9.6 h, water/biomass mass ratio of 3/1, for co-HTC of sewage sludge and sugarcane bagasse, resulting in useful adsorbents for lead. It was also observed that alkaline modification of the hydrochar significantly improved its adsorption capacity.
Hydrochar has also been evaluated as an adsorbent in sand plants for the removal of Escherichia coli during water treatment; the researchers performed activation of the hydrochar using an alkaline solution, increasing the adsorptive performance of the hydrochar by removing hydrophilic substances on the surface, resulting in an increase in hydrophobicity [54]. Similarly, Wang et al. [55] reported that sewage sludge-derived hydrochar achieved 2 to >3 log removal of human pathogenic rotaviruses and adenoviruses. These studies highlight the potential of hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge to produce hydrochars with superior adsorption properties, offering a sustainable solution for waste treatment and the adsorption of pollutants and biological agents. However, the optimum HTC conditions to remove these pollutants can vary for each one, indicating that further research should be carried out to better understand and optimize these processes for different applications.
1.2.3. BiofuelsThe production of hydrochar from the HTC of sewage sludge has attracted growing interest due to its potential to generate high value-added carbon materials, especially carbon-rich hydrochars with low ash content, something that the literature shows is not very feasible through direct hydrothermal carbonization [24,55]. Recent studies have shown that co-HTC, which involves the hydrothermal carbonization of mixtures of sewage sludge with other biomasses, can improve the higher heating value (HHV), thermal behavior, and overall quality of hydrochars compared to using a single raw material [20,56,57].
According to the literature, pH is one of the critical parameters influencing the ideal chemical conditions for producing hydrochars used as biofuels. Studies show that acidification improves the quality of hydrochar, reducing the ash content and increasing the HHV [55]. This adjustment promotes condensation-polymerization of dissolved organic compounds and inhibits the incorporation of inorganic products. Similar results have been observed by research indicating that manipulating the pH of the feed water using acetic acid can reduce the ash content and increase the fixed carbon in the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) process. However, acetic acid favored the leaching of significant amounts of mercury, iron, calcium, and aluminum into the liquid phase [58].
The improvement in hydrochars due to its production under an acidic pH can also be attributed to the catalytic role of hydronium ions (H3O+), which accelerate hydrolysis and intensifies the dehydration of organic materials [57]. In non-catalyzed HTC processes, temperature is an even more crucial factor. For example, observations indicated that temperature was the most determining parameter in controlling the process, with higher temperature accelerating the carbonization reactions, resulting in hydrochars with lower H/C and O/C ratios [59]. These results highlight the relevance of optimizing the parameters in the HTC to maximize the efficiency and quality of the hydrochars. The continuity of this research is essential to improve the applications of hydrochars as alternative biofuels, contributing to more sustainable energy solutions.
1.3. Economic Viability of HTC of Sewage SludgeThe economic viability of the sewage sludge treatment through HTC is a critical issue that can limit its development. Such treatment has been considered unprofitable without public subsidies [60]. In this context, although HTC technology is a potential alternative for sewage sludge treatment, there are challenges to be overcome.
Hydrochar has a high energy density, is transportable, and is potentially renewable, which can be used to feed the same hydrocarbonization process. However, its potential for use decreases when it is produced under unsuitable conditions, such as low temperature, resulting in a hydrochar with high nitrogen, sulfur, and ash contents. Therefore, for HTC to be economically viable, it is necessary to reduce hydrochar production costs through combined processes using catalysts and energy recovery, as reported in the literature [27]. For example, one study evaluated the economic benefits of HTC based on the potential revenues from heat, power, hydrochar and struvite in an integrated system. In addition, it highlighted a potential economic benefit, emphasizing the process as a critical component of the entire feasibility assessment [61].
Integrating HTC with anaerobic digestion has also improved energy recovery and reduced environmental impact. One study showed that energy recovery from sewage sludge increased from 14% to 28%, while global warming potential was reduced from 72 to 18 kg CO2-eq per ton of sludge [60]. Although HTC uses less energy than a thermal dryer, its energy advantages result in negligible investment opportunities due to the high initial investment cost [32].
Thus, hydrothermal carbonization technology offers a promising route for sustainable sewage sludge management, combining environmental and energy benefits. However, economic viability still faces critical challenges, as demonstrated by the high costs and market value of hydrochar. To overcome these barriers, it is necessary to adopt strategies to reduce production costs and improve the quality of hydrochar, such as an integrated approach, combining HTC with other technologies such as anaerobic digestion, the use of catalysts for the process, and the implementation of financial support policies that can offset the high initial investment costs. Scientific advances in HTC and its economic viability in sewage sludge treatment will be essential to maximize the economic and environmental benefits of this innovative technology.
In view of the above, the main goals of this study are: (1) To confirm critical research points in HTC; (2) To collect the main results and findings in the HTC process variables; (3) To assess countries’ contributions in the area of HTC research; (4) To present future outlooks on HTC applied to sewage sludge treatment. The results obtained in this study provide information on the large area of research involving HTC.
2. MethodsConcerning the bibliometric aspects of the research, a systematic review of the literature guided based on PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) was performed [62].
2.1. Review Implementation2.1.1. Data CollectionScopus metadata corresponding to 8,116 documents were retrieved using the keyword combination “Hydrothermal Carbonization” + “Sewage Sludge”. The types of documents retrieved were articles (6,102), analyses (1,495), book chapters (319), conference papers (133), books (43), editorials (13), short communications (3), observations (3), retractions (2), errata (2), and data papers (1). The study period for metadata surveying was limited from January 1, 2013, to August 3, 2023. After this first overview, 47 studies were selected considering the most significant “results” and “conclusions” from the literature, taking into account the process parameters (temperature and time). For this second step, the studies were retrieved from the CAPES Platform, the main Brazilian virtual library [63]. The criteria used for this were (a) studies published in the last 10 years, and (b) studies containing empirical data. In addition, the Skimmimg method was used to review the content of each article retrieved to align the information extracted based on (a) focus of study (gas phase, aqueous phase, solid phase); (b) parameters evaluated by the studies (temperature, time, pH, phosphorus recovery, addition of catalysts, mineral behavior, organic behavior, Co-HTC, combustion or energy potential); (c) abstracts; (d) main results; (e) conclusions; (f) access links.
2.1.2. Data AnalysesThe bibliometric analysis process was based on five stages: study design, data collection, data analysis, data visualization, and interpretation [64]. Two pieces of software were used to this: “Vosviewer”, which was developed in the Java programming language and is specialized for creating maps based on network data [65]; the second piece of software is “Biblioshiny”, which runs on a package based on the “R” programming language named “Bibliometrics”. The latter allows the two packages to be combined in an environment capable of creating an online data analysis structure generated on the website.
Vosviewer was used to create networks to specifically analyze word competition (titles, abstracts), using the abstracts and keywords of the 8,116 documents found as input data, with the aim of understanding which are the critical research points and topics of most significant interest to researchers in the period analyzed. On the other hand, Biblioshiny was used to extract information for the supplementary material and carry out analyses and graphs such as the keyword competition tree. In addition to the Bibliometrix package in the R programming environment, other packages, such as ggplot2, were used to visualize the information.
2.2. Disseminate and Report the Results of the AnalysisThe results of this study have been grouped and presented under the following headings: Results of the bibliometric analysis; Focus of study in sewage sludge HTC research; findings on the main parameters in the sewage sludge HTC process; additives for the sewage sludge HTC process.
3. Results and Discussion3.1. Bibliometric Analysis3.1.1. Publications on the HTCThe data considered in the following discussion was obtained from 8,116 documents extracted from the Scopus database corresponding to 2013 – 2023. Fig. S2a shows the annual number of publications follows an increasing trend, which indicates high levels of scientific knowledge research about HTC. From 2020 to 2023, there has been more significant growth than in previous years; in 2022, the rate of research and publication of scientific works increased by almost 50% compared to 2020. By August 2023, the number of publications had already reached 2021, which shows a promising perspective for maintaining the growth trend in the number of publications on the HTC topic. In addition, Fig. S2a shows that most publications are scientific articles, followed by reviews and book chapters, among the other documents, representing a small part of the total number of documents published. Fig. S2b shows the number of documents per year by language, in which English has been suppressed to allow a more precise visualization of the behavior of other languages on the HTC process. Therefore, this study showed that between 90 and 96% of all published studies were written in English. However, the second most published language is Mandarin, and it can also be seen that there was a remarkable increase in publications in Mandarin in 2021 compared to other years, increasing from 30 publications in 2020 to almost 60 publications in 2021. Furthermore, since 2018, studies on HTC have begun to be published in alternative languages, such as Korean, Portuguese, and Spanish.
3.1.2. Global network of research on HTCIn terms of contribution per country (Fig. 2), the publications on the HTC topic show a remarkable predominance of Chinese works. The collaborations with the most vital links in the case of China are specifically with the United States, Singapore, Hong Kong, and South Korea, generating cluster number 1 in this research network. The United Kingdom forms cluster 2, representing a solid connection with most European countries, America, and the Middle East. Cluster 3 is generated by Australia, forming a solid connection with Pakistan, Canada, and Bangladesh. Finally, India generates Cluster number 4 with solid links, especially with Asian countries such as Japan, Malaysia, Egypt, and Taiwan.
3.1.3. Cluster and competition analysisCluster and competition analysis of keywords, titles, and abstracts reflect the critical points of HTC research. This study collected 32,380 keywords and 111,883 words between titles and abstracts to build trees and competition networks. Fig. S3 (Supplementary Materials) was created by the Biblioshiny software, considering only the keywords of the documents; the algorithm was configured to show only the 25 most frequently used keywords. The five words with the most competition in the HTC search field are “Adsorption”, “Pyrolysis”, “Biomass”, “Biochar” and “Carbonization” with 9%, 8%, 6%, 6%, respectively. This shows that the phenomenon of adsorption of elements in the solid phase of the HTC process is the most researched part of the studies, corroborated by the keyword biochar, which is the solid product of the HTC process. Although pyrolysis is a different technology regarding HTC, it is the second word of most interest to researchers, showing a tendency to compare these two processes. Pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization have factors in common, such as temperature, that play an essential role in chemical reactions. However, the former is carried out under anoxic conditions, and the second in water. In addition, pyrolysis uses higher temperatures to create valuable products by partial loss of carbon; conversely, hydrothermal carbonization aims to increase the carbon content in the material [24,66]. Biomass is the third most cited word, but the competing keyword shows that researchers are interested in studying, for example, its transformation over the reaction time and the solid, liquid, and gaseous composition derived from the transformation of the biomass input into the HTC reactor. As mentioned above, biochar and carbonization appear as the fourth and fifth keywords, respectively, and they also show a high level of interest among researchers in solid products derived from the HTC process to study their composition and assess their potential for energy recovery. Curiously, the keyword hydrochar is not present in TreeMap (Fig. S3), suggesting that researchers have considered biochar to be a keyword equivalent to hydrochar and representative of the solid product produced in the HTC process.
Fig. 3 shows a competition analysis of the words in the titles and abstracts of the 8,116 documents in the Scopus database. It shows 4 clusters identified by the different colors on the map. The algorithm applied to this network was based on normalization using a strength of association method. This method is proportional to the ratio between the observed number of co-occurrences of objects and the expected number of co-occurrences of objects under the assumption that the occurrences are statistically independent [67].
The first green cluster is dominated by research into “Biochar”, a situation in which this topic is associated with removal mechanisms, adsorption of pollutants, pesticides, minerals, and antibiotics, and the study of the morphology of the biochar product through spectroscopy and SEM images, among others. The second cluster, the one pink, has high competition in the word “Hydrochar” associated with other fields of research, such as the kinetics and yield of hydrochar, carbon content as well as some process variables, such as temperature, input mass ratio, pressure, and combustion characteristics of hydrochar. This result also suggests that the word hydrochar has been used in titles and abstracts, which differs from what was found for keyword preferences. Cluster 3 (brown) has a predominance of the word “Technology”, thereby associating other lines of research such as energy recovery and conversion, co-digestion process, additional processes to the HTC process, such as anaerobic digestion, the study of life cycle analysis, also involving the industrial component with a link to development, applications of biochar and the relationship with climate change. Finally, the smallest yellow cluster shows a predominance of research into heavy metals about environmental risks, the soil, and the bioavailability of nutrients, among others.
Fig. 3 shows a notable interest in the solid product resulting from the hydrothermal carbonization (hydrochar) and pyrolysis (biochar) processes, highlighting its potential as materials useful for fuel and adsorption. However, it is observed that the liquid phase of HTC has received less attention than solid product. Since most of the product obtained after the hydrothermal process is liquid, it is crucial to investigate its potential use and applications. Studies focused on evaluating the environmental impact and toxicity of this liquid phase are essential for its acceptance as a biofertilizer, for instance. Approaching these areas of research will not only contribute to a better understanding of the liquid phase of HTC, but also it will promote its integration into sustainable waste management and agricultural practices.
3.2. Studies Focused on HTC of Sewage Sludge
Table 1 shows that among the 47 studies selected in this systematic review, 70.21, 91.49, and 17.02% are related to the aqueous, solid, and gaseous phases, respectively, resulting from the HTC process. For the variables addressed by the researchers, 70.21, 34.04, and 29.79% considered the variation of temperature, residence time, and pH, respectively. In addition, researchers studied the behavior of phosphorus, minerals (including heavy metals in some studies), and organic composition in 29.79 and 46.81%, respectively, of the total works considered. Furthermore, other parameters are recurrent, such as adding catalysts to the reaction and raw materials other than sewage sludge to the process (Co-HTC), with a percentage of 36.17 and 23.40%, respectively. Finally, it was found that among the 76.6% of the studies focused on the solid product, only 51.06% evaluated the energy potential of the hydrochars obtained.
Although several studies have explored the individual effects of temperature, time, pH, and solid/liquid ratio on hydrothermal carbonization (HTC), few investigations analyzed the synergistic interaction between these parameters. Future research employing multifactorial experimental designs or sensitivity analysis to optimize operating conditions more efficiently could provide more accurate results, achieving optimal characteristics for solid, liquid, and gas phases, promoting a more practical application of this technology.
3.3. Findings on Key Process Parameters in HTC of Sewage Sludge
Table 2 provides information on the temperature values and residence time evaluated in each of the 47 selected studies. The highest and lowest temperatures evaluated by the studies were 120 and 350ºC, respectively. The highest and lowest residence times were 0.25 and 24 h, respectively. The moisture content of the sewage sludge used in the studies was also presented. In comparison, 21.3% of the studies used Co-HTC, and 78.7% approached the HTC process.
The composition of biomass derived from sewage sludge and other organic wastes is highly dependent on several variables ranging from the intrinsic characteristics of the feedstock to the specific operating conditions during the hydrothermal carbonization process. Variables such as temperature, reaction time, feed water pH, and solid/liquid ratio play a crucial role in determining the physicochemical properties of the resulting products. In this context, Table 3 summarizes the critical parameters and their effects on the biomass based on the results found in the scientific literature.
3.3.2. HTC-temperatureThis review highlights temperature as a critical variable in the HTC process and proposes a critical discussion on their effects. Fig. 4 presents an overview on process temperature and some parameters relevant to the quality of hydrochars. The following subsections detail each topic covered in Fig. 4.
3.3.2.1. Temperature effects on hydrocharSeveral effects have been found on the hydrochars with transient increases in temperature up to the critical point that allows the formation of the optimum hydrochar in terms of composition, moisture content, and energy availability. Wang et al. [83] showed that increasing the temperature can be more effective than increasing the residence time to maximize the coalification of the hydrochar. They found an optimum reaction range between 190–220ºC with residence times between 1 and 2 h. Other studies coincide in the ranges of operating variables. Other studies coincide in the ranges of operating variables. Several studies have aligned concerning operational parameter ranges. For example, Wang et al. [56] adopted a milder approach, employing conditions of 160ºC and 2 h. However, some studies emphasize that the optimal temperature for the process is related to the chemical composition of the sewage sludge. This was reported by Zhai et al. [108], who found that achieving hydrochar with a high energy yield, even from sewage sludge with substantial ash content, required temperatures exceeding 220ºC. This observation was supported by Wang et al. [88], who determined 230ºC as the optimal temperature for hydrochar production using municipal sewage sludge with elevated ash content. Although some studies have identified even higher optimal temperatures, they have also integrated additional technical considerations to enhance comprehension of the hydrothermal carbonization process. Cavali et al. [18], studied co-HTC of residual pine sawdust and sewage sludge and found that the hydrochar presented a higher calorific value and a greater surface area at 250ºC. Nevertheless, they emphasized that 260 ºC is the ideal temperature for hydrochar production.
The reaction temperature significantly influences the hydrochar yield and its moisture content. Most studies report a decrease in hydrochar yield with increasing temperature. However, several researchers have monitored the effects of increasing the temperature above the optimum points on the content of fixed and total carbon, phosphates, functional groups, and ions, among others. Wang et al. [56] and Yang et al. [98] studied the effects of increasing the temperature in the range of 160–280ºC. They observed a decrease in the hydrochar yield from 91.23 to 57.92% and from 77.5 to 65.64%, respectively, and a decrease in volatile compounds from 59.38 to 37.27% and from 45.59 to 12.74%, respectively. In addition, the hydrochars showed an increase in the fixed carbon content from 9.20 to 17.25% and from 1.89 to 4.95%, respectively. The difference between these two studies is that the former implemented the co-hydrocarbonization technique by adding pine sawdust, and the second did not use blends, just sewage sludge. Notably, the first study obtained a more significant decrease in the hydrochar yield due to the high amount of organic matter in the process. Other studies have extended the temperature evaluation range up to 300ºC [68,85,108]. Obviously, the temperature increase must be limited in order to prevent unwanted chemical reactions, loss of hydrochar quality, and pushing the HTC process into a condition of energy unfeasibility.
3.3.2.2. Temperature effects on organic and nitrogen contentThe main components of organic matter, that is, protein, lipid, lignin, cellulose, and hemicellulose, have often been studied concerning temperature variations in the HTC process. Xu et al. [27] and Yang et al. [98] showed a significant decrease in the protein content with increasing temperature up to 240ºC, which displayed a correlation with the increase in ammonium ion (NH4+) content. Critical temperatures for the degradation of biomass proteins have also been found to increase the content of soluble and hydrolyzed proteins in the aqueous phase; Zheng et al. [79] found an optimal decomposition for proteins into amino acids at 230°C. Xie et al. [103] reported that lipids could be a potential substance for improving the yield of hydrochar above 210ºC, a temperature in which lipids are less prone to carbonization. In addition, Zheng et al. [79] associated a significant decrease in the carbon content of a hydrochar produced at 280ºC with the degradation of lipids into gases, alcohols, and insoluble aldehydes. Regarding lignin, it was found that it begins to decompose at a temperature above 250ºC, which may be the limiting temperature for this approach, contrary to cellulose, which initiates dissolution at 180ºC, at 230ºC, it swiftly undergoes decomposition, giving rise to refractory aromatic hydrocarbons [18,114]. Subsequently, at 330ºC, complete solubilization occurs. It was also found that cellulose can capture and retain soluble nitrogen compounds in the range of 210–240ºC. It was found that hemicellulose begins to decompose above 160ºC and has an outstanding contribution to hydrochar in the range of 210–240ºC [18,103].
Usually, nitrogen compounds are studied because they are present in sewage in different ways and show dynamic behavior throughout chemical reactions. Most studies have observed significant changes in nitrogen content in the range of 210–240ºC, increasing the proportion between soluble and insoluble nitrogen species. Marin-Batista et al. [97] showed a significant increase in nitrogen-bearing species in the aqueous phase, such as amines, pyrimidines, and pyrazines, formed from the hydrolysis of proteins and carbohydrates. Yang et al. [98] reported a slight decrease in pyrrole content from 31.71 to 27.32% and an increase in pyridine-based compounds in the range of 200–240ºC. Similarly, Wang et al. [83] and Zheng et al. [101] found that the yield of pyridine increased significantly, while pyrrole decreased in the range of 190–220°C, probably because part of the pyrrole was converted into pyridine. However, pyrrole content began to increase in the range of 220–250°C due to the carbonyl-ammonia reaction. In contrast, research indicates that with elevated temperatures, the translocation of nitrogen to the solid phase becomes more pronounced, leading to complete hydrolysis of inorganic nitrogen within the hydrochar in the liquid phase.
3.3.2.3. Temperature effects on mineral contentThe increase in temperature for the HTC process promotes a series of transformations in the biomass, generating free radicals, new chemical species, and minerals. Several authors have studied these changes for minerals, such as phosphorus and heavy metals, and pharmaceutical compounds that can become part of conventional sewage sludge [84]. According to Zhu et al. [102], environmentally persistent free radicals (EPFRs) can occur at relatively low temperatures compared to pyrolysis. Due to the process of hydrolysis and cleavage of biomass by subcritical water supported by temperature increase, EPFRs can be produced from the breaking of surface bonds of biomass. The formation of free radicals can also oxidize minerals such as aliphatic and aromatic sulfur, among others [88].
Additionally, the increase in temperature is crucial for the redistribution of heavy metals in the solid-liquid phases [46,115]. Under high temperatures and pressure, heavy metals in the ionic form leach easily into the liquid phase, but many factors reduce leaching and promote the immobilization of heavy metals in the solid phase [68,116]. Some minerals containing calcium and magnesium, as well as alkaline metals and alkaline-iron metals, can be adsorbed on hydrochar under high temperatures (260°C) [68,88]. Additionally, Wang et al. [88] found that above 290ºC, alkaline or alkaline-earth minerals such as albite and dolomite can be removed from hydrochar and can also form new mineral species. Other minerals, such as those containing phosphorus, are commonly studied due to their high content in sewage sludge, appreciable economic value, and potential to be applied in fertilizer formulation. Several studies have shown that increasing the HTC process temperature leads to the enrichment of inorganic phosphorus in the hydrochar due to the presence of free radicals that increase the decomposition of phosphorus-based compounds [18,117,118]. It was reported that HTC can exert a dephosphorylating effect on water, fixing phosphorus in the solid phase in the range of 180–240ºC. However, when the temperature rises to 270–300ºC, the phosphorus concentration in the hydrothermal liquid increases [68]. It has also been found that at very high temperatures, some of the phosphorus from the reaction is released as phosphorus oxide [119].
3.3.3. HTC residence timeResidence time, or reaction time as it is commonly designated by several authors, is another critical parameter on hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Fig. S4 highlights the main effects of the residence time on hydrochars. The following subsections detail each topic covered in Fig. S4.
3.3.3.1. Residence time effects on hydrocharRegarding the effects of the residence time on the hydrochar characteristics, it has been reported that a short reaction time associated with a moderate temperature is recommended to achieve maximum carbon yields in the hydrochar [48,90,120]. Conversely, other studies have found that a long reaction time at a high temperature (>260ºC) leads to the production of a hydrochar with higher ash content [56,69], which represents a disadvantage for generating an efficient combustion material [95]. However, longer times at higher temperatures allow intense dehydration of the biomass during the HTC process, which decreases the availability of the hydroxyl (-OH) group [71]. Due to the combination of long time and low temperature, strong effects were found on the partitioning nutrients in hydrochar [121].
3.3.3.2. Residence time effects on mineral contentLiterature reports that extending the reaction time and increasing the temperature can disintegrate organic phosphorus, thereby confirming that this procedure was the most influential factor for the transformation of this element [95]. Tangredi et al. [122] evaluated whether a low temperature with a longer time can have the same effect on phosphorus as a shorter time associated with a higher temperature. However, they were unable to affirm this hypothesis based on their results. The studies showed a high dependence between reaction time and behavior of the heavy metals, including discrepancies between different metals. It was reported that the concentrations of cadmium and chromium in the hydrochar increased almost twofold with increasing reaction time but decreased for copper and zinc [123]. A more favorable increase in zinc content in hydrochar was reported due to the increase of reaction time. On the other hand, for lead and cadmium contents, it was found a solid correlation with residence time [124].
3.3.3.3. Residence time effects on nitrogen contentChanges in the nitrogen content of the sewage sludge due to variations in carbonization residence time have also been studied. In the literature, it is possible to note that increases in residence time are associated with increases in nitrogen content in the hydrochar due to the continuous fixation of this element, in addition to the transformation of nitrogen into more stable forms. However, Chen et al. [7] concluded that carbonization time mainly affects the distribution of nitrogen, different from temperature, which mainly determines the form of nitrogen. They also reported similar effects between increasing temperature and increasing carbonization time, as both increased the concentration of ammonium ion (NH4+). Sarrion et al. [125] showed that the increase in NH4+ content occurs mainly due to organic nitrogen transformation and to the increase in reaction time, probably due to the gradual hydrolysis of dissolved protein. The increases in nitrogen content and nitrogen retention rates in the hydrochar can occur due to prolongation of residence time, mainly reflecting an increase in the formation of pyrrole-N species [83]. It was also found that short carbonization times and low temperatures resulted in an effluent with a high cumulative methane yield due to the low rate of formation of toxic components for methanogenic bacteria [56], and for a long time and a low temperature, the nitrogen in the hydrochar is transferred to the liquid phase, due to the slow hydrolysis of proteins [7].
3.4. Additives for the HTC Process in Sewage SludgeThe addition of catalysts in the HTC process not only increases the conversion efficiency of the raw material, but their use can also help to immobilize even more diverse products in the HTC process [123]. This review highlights the use of additives or catalysts in the HTC process for immobilizing heavy metals, process accelerators (hydrolysis, dehydration, and decarboxylation reactions), and the transformation of phosphorus and nitrogen (Fig. 5). Xu and Jiang [68] reported that adding FeCl3 and Al(OH)3 increased the exchangeable states of zinc, lead, chromium, and cadmium and showed a decrease in their residual forms. Furthermore, they observed that adding these catalysts promoted macromolecular and solid organic matter decomposition and hydrolysis.
The addition of sodium chloride (NaCl) promoted hydrolysis, dehydration, and decarboxylation, affecting the properties and yield of the hydrochar [82]. Similarly, the use of layered double oxides (LDO) promoted the decarboxylation, dehydration, and denitrification of the hydrochar, thus removing the nitrogen content in the hydrochar by approximately 65%. In addition, it was shown that with the increase in temperature and the addition of LDO, the organic nitrogen in the hydrochar decreased, suggesting that this addition can release and promote the decomposition of proteins [77]. Likewise, Huang et al. [91] also showed increases in the removal of nitrogen in the hydrochar with the addition of acetates. However, some researchers have studied the retention of nitrogen in hydrochar; for example, Wang et al. found that the addition of starches and xylans favored nitrogen retention between 36.8 and 50.9%, respectively, concluding that the synergy between sewage sludge, food waste and the addition of starches and xylans could prepare nitrogen-rich materials or clean-carbon-rich fuels [93].
The transformation of phosphorus through the addition of calcium (CaCl2 and CaO) was studied, thus showing retention and bioavailability of phosphorus in the hydrochar, stimulating an almost complete transformation of non-apatite inorganic phosphorus into apatite phosphorus [75,106]. Likewise, the addition of nitric acid amplified phosphate recovery, in addition to cleaning exhaust gases by indirectly removing hydrogen sulfide [78]. Similarly, Malhotra and Garg [107], who studied the recovery of resources from the liquid phase and the thermal behavior of hydrochar obtained from the HTC process, found that the addition of ammonium sulfate as a salting agent would influence the recovery of phosphates in the liquid phase as struvite; in addition, they showed that the recovery of humic acid with the addition of ammonium sulfate improved plant growth after its application.
In summary, the retention or reduction of nutrients in the solid or liquid phases resulting from the hydrothermal carbonization reaction of sewage sludge can be improved by adding different compounds, thus allowing further use and reducing different environmental impacts.
4. Future Outlooks of HTC Applied to Sewage Sludge TreatmentThe hydrothermal carbonization process appears as a powerful green technology for the management of sewage sludge based on a range of possibilities directly related to the UN’s sustainable development goals. Indeed, a deeper understanding of the mechanisms that rule its complex chemistry and its dissemination across the world will contribute to its competitiveness concerning the conventional sewage treatment used in WTTPs and also in comparison to incineration, which is a destructive way of treating residual biomass.
From a more optimistic point of view, the HTC technology could bring disruptive innovation to wastewater and sewage sludge treatment, considering a typical WWTP as an open-loop recycling station capable of generating important sustainable products. This novel business model will be fundamental to boosting the economy of developing countries with high domestic sewage generation, which should also favor public and private investments for the construction of industrial plants and increase access for communities in vulnerable conditions to environmental sanitation.
In this sense, an essential reason for the eventual success of HTC technology in the coming years lies in its flexibility for coupling to other industrial processes in a circular economy context. For instance, HTC technology could directly favor the viability of biorefineries due to its potential to support the energy supply or even the production of biofertilizers and valuable precursors.
Biorefineries face the challenge of overcoming highly endothermic routes, which require high energy (heat) to satisfy energy demand. The availability of renewable solid fuel with a high calorific value, such as hydrochar, gives HTC technology significant relevance within the energy transition in the next few years.
Some examples of this type of perspective have been reported in the literature. Important synergies can be achieved when an HTC plant is employed as a central hub for a regional biorefinery, making available an alternative solid fuel (hydrochar), which is less energy-demanding than drying of the raw biomass and pressed into pellets or briquettes; the ashes from the burning of fuel can be a source of nutrients as phosphorus [126]. Likewise, Cavali et al. [8] reviewed the hydrothermal carbonization of potential biomass waste, including sewage sludge, the characterization and environmental utilization of hydrochar, and the biorefinery potential of this process. Among the various works cited, there is a consensus on the preference for using primary sewage sludge instead of secondary one if the focus is the use of hydrochar as a solid biofuel because the ash content increases throughout the organic matter digestion, providing a lower energy amount per mass unit.
The use of primary sewage sludge corroborates the perspective of replacement of a conventional WWTP for an innovative business model even more robustly than well-stablished technologies such as incineration, which, although it is an alternative to WWTP, does not allow the reuse of the various compounds contained in residual biomass.
Finally, the choice of a specific route, focused on the optimized production of just one of the three phases generated by HTC, depends on a set of information, such as type of biomass available, flexibility of local environmental regulations, market trends, political scenario, which can generate exceptional demands due to warfare or armed conflicts, among others.
5. ConclusionsThis review has compiled important information on hydrothermal carbonization research and its main parameters. According to the bibliometric results, China has the most research on HTC; the prominent global research focuses are centered on the solid product and the mechanisms of removing and absorbing nutrients, minerals, and pollutants. The systematic review of the 47 selected studies showed that liquid, solid, and gaseous products were studied in 70.21, 91.49, and 17.02%, respectively; in addition, the variables most studied by researchers in HTC were changes in temperature, residence time and pH with a percentage of 70.21, 34.04, and 29.79% respectively. This review detailed the effects and findings about reaction temperature and residence time in HTC with hydrochar yield, organic content, and mineral content. The hydrochar yield and organic matter content consistently decreased with increasing temperature and residence time. At the same time, minerals such as heavy metals showed that increasing temperature and residence time are crucial for redistributing heavy metals in the solid-liquid phases. The incorporation of various compounds has been extensively investigated in the literature, primarily targeting the immobilization of heavy metals and the retention and recovery of nitrogen and phosphorus. However, the hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge, particularly Co-HTC, merits increased attention due to its substantial potential for product utilization. This review endeavors to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of HTC research and the key process variables involved.
AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish to thank Fundação Araucária - Brazil (grant agreement 006/2021 NAPI-HCR project), and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico – Brazil (grant agreement: 305189/2020-4).
NotesAuthor Contributions KNPC (Masters student) performed the bibliometric research and data analysis; MEAM (Masters student) participated on draft writing and formatting; RMG (Associate professor) participated on draft writing and performed the language review; AB (Associate professor) is the responsible for student guidance, and performed the draft and final text writing. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. References1. Sun X, Liu B, Zhang L, et al. Partial ozonation of returned sludge via high-concentration ozone to reduce excess sludge production: A pilot study. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;807:150773.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150773
2. Zhen K, Zhu Q, Zhai S, et al. PPCPs and heavy metals from hydrothermal sewage sludge-derived biochar: Migration in wheat and physiological response. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022;29:83234–83246.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-21432-2
3. Shaddel S, Bakhtiary-Davijany H, Kabbe C, Dadgar F, Østerhus SW. Sustainable sewage sludge management: From current practices to emerging nutrient recovery technologies. Sustainability. 2019;11:3435.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su11123435
4. Halkos G, Gkampoura E-C. Where do we stand on the 17 Sustainable Development Goals? An overview on progress. Econ. Anal. Policy. 2021;70:94–122.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2021.02.001
5. Sharma P, Pandey AK, Udayan A, Kumar S. Role of microbial community and metal-binding proteins in phytoremediation of heavy metals from industrial wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2021;326:124750.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124750
6. Lin L, Yang H, Xu X. Effects of water pollution on human health and disease heterogeneity: A Review. Front. Environ. Sci. 2022;10:880246.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.880246
7. Chen Y, Tian L, Liu T, et al. Speciation and transformation of nitrogen for sewage sludge hydrothermal carbonization-influence of temperature and carbonization time. Waste Manag. 2023;162:8–17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.03.007
8. Cavali M, Junior NL, de Sena JD, et al. A review on hydrothermal carbonization of potential biomass wastes, characterization and environmental applications of hydrochar, and biorefinery perspectives of the process. Sci. Total. Environ. 2023;857:159627.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159627
9. Pawlak-Kruczek H, Niedzwiecki L, Sieradzka M, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of agricultural and municipal solid waste digestates – Structure and energetic properties of the solid products. Fuel. 2020;275:117837.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117837
10. Marin-Batista JD, Villamil JA, Qaramaleki SV, Coronella CJ, Mohedano AF, de la Rubia MA. Energy valorization of cow manure by hydrothermal carbonization and anaerobic digestion. Renew. Energy. 2020;160:623–632.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.07.003
11. Bento LR, Castro AJR, Moreira AB, Ferreira OP, Bisinoti MC, Melo CA. Release of nutrients and organic carbon in different soil types from hydrochar obtained using sugarcane bagasse and vinasse. Geoderma. 2019;334:24–32.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.07.034
12. Wu S, Wang Q, Fang M, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of food waste for sustainable biofuel production: Advancements, challenges, and future prospects. Sci. Total Environ. 2023;897:165327.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.165327
13. Khoo CG, Lam MK, Mohamed AR, Lee KT. Hydrochar production from high-ash low-lipid microalgal biomass via hydrothermal carbonization: Effects of operational parameters and products characterization. Environ. Res. 2020;188:109828.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109828
14. Capobianco L, Di Caprio F, Altimari P, Astolfi ML, Pagnanelli F. Production of an iron-coated adsorbent for arsenic removal by hydrothermal carbonization of olive pomace: Effect of the feedwater pH. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;273:111164.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111164
15. Wang T, Si B, Gong Z, Zhai Y, Cao M, Peng C. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of food waste-woody sawdust blend: Interaction effects on the hydrochar properties and nutrients characteristics. Bioresour. Technol. 2020;316:123900.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123900
16. Yang SK, Kim D, Han SK, Kim H, Park S. Conversion of organic residue from solid-state anaerobic digestion of livestock waste to produce the solid fuel through hydrothermal carbonization. Environ. Eng. Res. 2018;23:456–461.
https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2018.055
17. Wilk M, Magdziarz A, Jayaraman K, Szymańska-Chargot M, Gökalp I. Hydrothermal carbonization characteristics of sewage sludge and lignocellulosic biomass. A comparative study. Biomass Bioenergy. 2019;120:166–175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.016
18. Cavali M, Benbelkacem H, Kim B, et al. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of pine residual sawdust and non-dewatered sewage sludge – effect of reaction conditions on hydrochar characteristics. J. Environ. Manag. 2023;340:117994.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117994
19. Fakudze S, Chen J. A critical review on co-hydrothermal carbonization of biomass and fossil-based feedstocks for cleaner solid fuel production: Synergistic effects and environmental benefits. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;457:141004.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.141004
20. Lu X, Ma X, Chen X. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and lignocellulosic biomass: Fuel properties and heavy metal transformation behavior of hydrochars. Energy. 2021;221:119896.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.119896
21. Ender T, Ekanthalu VS, Jalalipour H, Sprafke J, Nelles M. Process waters from hydrothermal carbonization of waste biomasses like sewage sludge: challenges, legal aspects, and opportunities in EU and Germany. Water. 2024;16:1003.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w16071003
22. Danso-Boateng E, Holdich RG, Wheatley AD, Martin SJ, Shama G. Hydrothermal carbonization of primary sewage sludge and synthetic faeces: Effect of reaction temperature and time on filterability. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy. 2015;34:1279–90.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.12114
23. Roslan SZ, Zainudin SF, Mohd Aris A, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge into solid biofuel: Influences of process conditions on the energetic properties of hydrochar. Energies. 2023;16:2483.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en16052483
24. Kossińska N, Krzyżyńska R, Ghazal H, Jouhara H. Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge and resulting biofuels as a sustainable energy source. Energy. 2023;275:127337.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.127337
25. Schnell M, Horst T, Quicker P. Thermal treatment of sewage sludge in Germany: A review. J. Environ. Manag. 2020;263:110367.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110367
26. Nunes N, Ragonezi C, Gouveia CSS, de Carvalho MAAP. Review of sewage sludge as a soil amendment in relation to current international guidelines: A heavy metal perspective. Sustainability. 2021;13:2317.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su13042317
27. Xu ZX, Ma XQ, Zhou J, et al. The influence of key reactions during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge on aqueous phase properties: A review. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2022;167:105678.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105678
28. Tasca AL, Puccini M, Gori R, Corsi I, Galletti AMR, Vitolo S. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: A critical analysis of process severity, hydrochar properties and environmental implications. Waste Manag. 2019;93:1–13.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.05.027
29. Murray A, Horvath A, Nelson KL. Hybrid life-cycle environmental and cost inventory of sewage sludge treatment and end-use scenarios: A case study from China. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:3163–3169.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es702256w
30. Zhao K, Li Y, Zhou Y, Guo W, Jiang H, Xu Q. Characterization of hydrothermal carbonization products (hydrochars and spent liquor) and their biomethane production performance. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;267:9–16.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.06.112
31. Tessini C, Romero R, Escobar M, Gordon A, Flores M. Development of an analytical method for the main organic compounds derived from thermochemical conversion of biomass. J. Chil. Chem. Soc. 2016;61:2837–2842.
http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0717-97072016000100017
32. Wang L, Chang Y, Li A. Hydrothermal carbonization for energy-efficient processing of sewage sludge: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019;108:423–440.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.011
33. Czerwińska K, Śliz M, Wilk M. Hydrothermal carbonization process: Fundamentals, main parameter characteristics and possible applications including an effective method of SARS-CoV-2 mitigation in sewage sludge. A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022;154:111873.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111873
34. Khosravi A, Zheng H, Liu Q, Hashemi M, Tang Y, Xing B. Production and characterization of hydrochars and their application in soil improvement and environmental remediation. Chem. Eng. J. 2022;430:133142.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133142
35. Razzaghi F, Obour PB, Arthur E. Does biochar improve soil water retention? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Geoderma. 2020;361:114055.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.114055
36. Sun K, Han L, Yang Y, et al. Application of hydrochar altered soil microbial community composition and the molecular structure of native soil organic carbon in a paddy soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020;54:2715–25.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b05864
37. Xia Y, Luo H, Li D, et al. Efficient immobilization of toxic heavy metals in multi-contaminated agricultural soils by amino-functionalized hydrochar: Performance, plant responses and immobilization mechanisms. Environ. Pollut. 2020;261:114217.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114217
38. Luutu H, Rose MT, McIntosh S, et al. Phytotoxicity induced by soil-applied hydrothermally-carbonised waste amendments: effect of reaction temperature, feedstock and soil nutrition. Plant Soil. 2023;493:647–61.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S11104-023-06265-3
39. Karatas O, Khataee A, Kalderis D. Recent progress on the phytotoxic effects of hydrochars and toxicity reduction approaches. Chemosphere. 2022;298:134357.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134357
40. Melo TM, Bottlinger M, Schulz E, et al. Plant and soil responses to hydrothermally converted sewage sludge (sewchar). Chemosphere. 2018;206:338–48.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.178
41. Wu Y, Hou P, Guo Z, et al. Raw material of water-washed hydrochar was critical for the mitigation of GHGI in infertile paddy soil: a column experiment. Biochar. 2021;3:381–90.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S42773-021-00094-2
42. Liu T, Tian L, Liu Z, et al. Distribution and toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons during CaO-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Waste Manag. 2021;120:616–25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.025
43. Mau V, Neumann J, Wehrli B, Gross A. Nutrient behavior in hydrothermal carbonization aqueous phase following recirculation and reuse. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:10426–34.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03080
44. Celletti S, Lanz M, Bergamo A, et al. Evaluating the aqueous phase from hydrothermal carbonization of cow manure digestate as possible fertilizer solution for plant growth. Front. Plant Sci. 2021;12:687434.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.687434
45. Fregolente LG, Miguel TBAR, de Castro Miguel E, et al. Toxicity evaluation of process water from hydrothermal carbonization of sugarcane industry by-products. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019;26:27579–89.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1771-2
46. Wang L, Chang Y, Liu Q. Fate and distribution of nutrients and heavy metals during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge with implication to land application. J. Clean. Prod. 2019;225:972–983.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.347
47. Yahav Spitzer R, Mau V, Gross A. Using hydrothermal carbonization for sustainable treatment and reuse of human excreta. J. Clean. Prod. 2018;205:955–63.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.126
48. Danso-Boateng E, Shama G, Wheatley AD, Martin SJ, Holdich RG. Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge: Effect of process conditions on product characteristics and methane production. Bioresour. Technol. 2015;177:318–327.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.11.096
49. Wang C, Ling X, Sun W, Sun X, He C. Elaboration of cost-effective adsorbents derived from sewage sludge through hydrothermal carbonization: Influence of process parameters and feedstock components on the adsorption performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2024;434:140358.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.140358
50. Montaño MEA, Romeral RAF, de Almeida Silva M, et al. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and waste pickling acid to produce a novel adsorbent for hydrogen sulfide removal from biogas. Arab J Sci Eng. 2024;1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-09129-9
51. Cheng C, He Q, Ismail TM, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of rape straw: Effect of reaction parameters on hydrochar and migration of AAEMs. Chemosphere. 2022;291:132785.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132785
52. Martins VMS, Sante LGG, Giona RM, Possetti GRC, Bail A. An inter-loop approach for hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge to produce hydrochars and their use as an adsorbent for iron removal from spent sulfuric acid. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy. 2022;24:1639–52.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-021-02269-8
53. Ebrahim Malool M, Keshavarz Moraveji M, Shayegan J. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of digested sewage sludge and sugarcane bagasse: Integrated approach for waste management, optimized production, characterization and Pb(II) adsorption. Alex. Eng. J. 2023;74:79–105.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.05.018
54. Chung JW, Edewi OC, Foppen JW, Gerner G, Krebs R, Luc Lens PN. Removal of Escherichia coli by intermittent operation of saturated sand columns supplemented with hydrochar derived from sewage sludge. Appl. Sci. 2017;7:839.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app7080839
55. Wang L, Yin G, Chang Y, Qiao S. Carbon-rich and low-ash hydrochar formation from sewage sludge by alkali-thermal hydrolysis coupled with acid-assisted hydrothermal carbonization. Waste Manag. 2024;177:182–95.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2024.01.052
56. Wang R, Lin K, Ren D, et al. Energy conversion performance in co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and pinewood sawdust coupling with anaerobic digestion of the produced wastewater. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;803:149964.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149964
57. Shakiba A, Aliasghar A, Moazeni K, Pazoki M. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge with sawdust and corn stalk: Optimization of process parameters and characterization of hydrochar. Bioenergy Res. 2023;16:2386–97.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-022-10552-9
58. Paiboonudomkarn S, Wantala K, Lubphoo Y, Khunphonoi R. Conversion of sewage sludge from industrial wastewater treatment to solid fuel through hydrothermal carbonization process. Mater. Today Proc. 2023;75:85–90.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.11.107
59. Ha DT, Tran KQ, Trinh TT. New insights into the hydrothermal carbonization process of sewage sludge: A reactive molecular dynamics study. Fuel. 2024;361:130692.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130692
60. Medina-Martos E, Istrate IR, Villamil JA, Gálvez-Martos JL, Dufour J, Mohedano ÁF. Techno-economic and life cycle assessment of an integrated hydrothermal carbonization system for sewage sludge. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;277:122930.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122930
61. Aragón-Briceño CI, Ross AB, Camargo-Valero MA. Mass and energy integration study of hydrothermal carbonization with anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Renew. Energy. 2021;167:473–83.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.103
62. Takkouche B, Norman G. PRISMA Statement. Epidemiology. 2011;22:128.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0b013e3181fe7999
63. CAPES Platform – Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel. Federal Government of Brazil; Available from: https://www-periodicos-capes-gov-br.ezl.periodicos.capes.gov.br/
64. Zupic I, Čater T. Bibliometric Methods in management and organization. Organ. Res. Methods. 2015;18:429–472.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629
65. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84:523–538.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
66. Kaur R, Gera P, Jha MK. Study on effects of different operating parameters on the pyrolysis of biomass: A review. J. Biofuels Bioenergy. 2015;1:135–147.
https://doi.org/10.5958/2454-8618.2015.00015.2
67. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. How to normalize cooccurrence data? An analysis of some well-known similarity measures. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 2009;60:1635–1651.
https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21075
68. Xu X, Jiang E. Treatment of urban sludge by hydrothermal carbonization. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;238:182–187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.03.174
69. Xu ZX, Song H, Li PJ, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Effect of aqueous phase recycling. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;387:123410.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.123410
70. Xu Z, Ma X, Liao J, Osman SM, Wu S, Luque R. Effects on the physicochemical properties of hydrochar originating from deep eutectic solvent (urea and ZnCl2)-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2022;10:4258–4268.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c00086
71. Peng C, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, et al. Production of char from sewage sludge employing hydrothermal carbonization: Char properties, combustion behavior and thermal characteristics. Fuel. 2016;176:110–118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.02.068
72. Liu X, Zhai Y, Li S, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Effect of feed-water pH on hydrochar’s physicochemical properties, organic component and thermal behavior. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020;388:122084.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122084
73. Parshetti GK, Liu Z, Jain A, Srinivasan MP, Balasubramanian R. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge for energy production with coal. Fuel. 2013;111:201–210.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.04.052
74. Luo X, Huang Z, Lin J, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and in-situ preparation of hydrochar/MgAl-layered double hydroxides composites for adsorption of Pb(II). J. Clean. Prod. 2020;258:120991.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120991
75. Zheng X, Ye Y, Jiang Z, et al. Enhanced transformation of phosphorus (P) in sewage sludge to hydroxyapatite via hydrothermal carbonization and calcium-based additive. Sci. Total Environ. 2020;738:139786.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139786
76. He C, Giannis A, Wang JY. Conversion of sewage sludge to clean solid fuel using hydrothermal carbonization: Hydrochar fuel characteristics and combustion behavior. Appl. Energy. 2013;111:257–266.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.04.084
77. Zhang B, Wang J, Xu Z, Wu S, Luque R, Zhang H. Sewage sludge valorisation by hydrothermal carbonization: A new method to enhance nitrogen removal in hydrochar catalyzed with Ni–Mg–Al layered double oxides. J. Clean. Prod. 2023;386:135880.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.135880
78. Becker GC, Wüst D, Köhler H, Lautenbach A, Kruse A. Novel approach of phosphate-reclamation as struvite from sewage sludge by utilising hydrothermal carbonization. J. Environ. Manag. 2019;238:119–125.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.121
79. Zheng C, Ma X, Yao Z, Chen X. The properties and combustion behaviors of hydrochars derived from co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and food waste. Bioresour. Technol. 2019;285:121347.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121347
80. Liu T, Liu Z, Zheng Q, et al. Effect of hydrothermal carbonization on migration and environmental risk of heavy metals in sewage sludge during pyrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2018;247:282–290.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.09.090
81. Xu ZX, Song H, Zhang S, et al. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of digested sewage sludge and cow dung biogas residue: Investigation of the reaction characteristics. Energy. 2019;187:115972.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.115972
82. Ma XQ, Liao JJ, Chen DB, Xu ZX. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Catalytic effect of Cl– on hydrochars physicochemical properties. Mol. Catal. 2021;513:111789.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2021.111789
83. Wang C, Zhu W, Fan X. Char derived from sewage sludge of hydrothermal carbonization and supercritical water gasification: Comparison of the properties of two chars. Waste Manag. 2021;123:88–96.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.01.027
84. Miserli K, Nastopoulou A, Konstantinou I. Removal of organic pollutants (pharmaceuticals and pesticides) from sewage sludge by hydrothermal carbonization using response surface methodology (RSM). J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2022;97:3111–3120.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.7178
85. Wang Z, Zhai Y, Wang T, et al. Effect of temperature on the sulfur fate during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Environ. Pollut. 2020;260:114067.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114067
86. Ovsyannikova E, Arauzo PJ, Becker GC, Kruse A. Experimental and thermodynamic studies of phosphate behavior during the hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 2019;692:147–156.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.217
87. Wang T, Zhai Y, Zhu Y, et al. Feedwater pH affects phosphorus transformation during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;245:182–187.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.114
88. Wang R, Wang C, Zhao Z, Jia J, Jin Q. Energy recovery from high-ash municipal sewage sludge by hydrothermal carbonization: Fuel characteristics of biosolid products. Energy. 2019;186:115848.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.07.178
89. Liu L, Zhai Y, Wang H, et al. Treatment of sewage sludge hydrothermal carbonization aqueous phase by Fe(II)/CaO2 system: Oxidation behaviors and mechanism of organic compounds. Waste Manag. 2023;158:164–175.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2023.01.016
90. Gaur RZ, Khoury O, Zohar M, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge coupled with anaerobic digestion: Integrated approach for sludge management and energy recycling. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020;224:113353.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113353
91. Huang J, Wang Z, Qiao Y, Wang B, Yu Y, Xu M. Transformation of nitrogen during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Effects of temperature and Na/Ca acetates addition. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2021;38:4335–4344.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2020.06.075
92. Liu L, Zhai Y, Liu X, et al. Features and mechanisms of sewage sludge hydrothermal carbonization aqueous phase after ferrous/persulfate-based process: The selective effect of oxidation and coagulation. J. Clean. Prod. 2022;366:132831.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132831
93. Wang Z, Huang J, Wang B, et al. Co-hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge and model compounds of food waste: Influence of mutual interaction on nitrogen transformation. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;807:150997.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150997
94. Czerwińska K, Marszałek A, Kudlek E, Śliz M, Dudziak M, Wilk M. The treatment of post-processing liquid from the hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 2023;885:163858.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163858
95. Li S, Zeng W, Jia Z, Wu G, Xu H, Peng Y. Phosphorus species transformation and recovery without apatite in FeCl3-assisted sewage sludge hydrothermal treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;399:125735.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125735
96. Shan G, Li W, Bao S, et al. Energy and nutrient recovery by spent mushroom substrate-assisted hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Waste Manag. 2023;155:192–198.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.11.012
97. Marin-Batista JD, Mohedano AF, Rodríguez JJ, de la Rubia MA. Energy and phosphorous recovery through hydrothermal carbonization of digested sewage sludge. Waste Manag. 2020;105:566–74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.03.004
98. Yang X, Wang B, Guo Y, Yang F, Cheng F. Insights into the structure evolution of sewage sludge during hydrothermal carbonization under different temperatures. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2023;69:105839.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105839
99. Wang H, Yang Z, Li X, Liu Y. Distribution and transformation behaviors of heavy metals and phosphorus during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020;27:17109–17122.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08098-4
100. Tasca AL, Stefanelli E, Galletti AMR, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Analysis of process severity and solid content. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2020;43:2382–2392.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202000095
101. Zheng X, Shen M, Ying Z, Feng Y, Wang B, Dou B. Correlating phosphorus transformation with process water during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge via experimental study and mathematical modelling. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;807:150750.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.150750
102. Zhu Y, Wei J, Liu Y, Liu X, Li J, Zhang J. Assessing the effect on the generation of environmentally persistent free radicals in hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:17092.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-53781-3
103. Xie L, Gou L, Xu D, Kapusta K, Dai L, Wang Y. Coupling influences of organic components and temperature on nitrogen transformation and hydrochar characterization during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Sci. Total Environ. 2023;866:161354.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.161354
104. Zhang X, Zhang L, Li A. Hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge and pinewood sawdust for nutrient-rich hydrochar production: Synergistic effects and products characterization. J. Environ. Manag. 2017;201:52–62.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.06.018
105. He C, Zhang Z, Ge C, et al. Synergistic effect of hydrothermal co-carbonization of sewage sludge with fruit and agricultural wastes on hydrochar fuel quality and combustion behavior. Waste Manag. 2019;100:171–181.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.09.018
106. Zheng X, Jiang Z, Ying Z, et al. Migration and transformation of phosphorus during hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge: Focusing on the role of pH and calcium additive and the transformation mechanism. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2020;8:7806–7814.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.0c00031
107. Malhotra M, Garg A. Hydrothermal carbonization of centrifuged sewage sludge: Determination of resource recovery from liquid fraction and thermal behaviour of hydrochar. Waste Manag. 2020;117:114–123.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.07.026
108. Zhai Y, Peng C, Xu B, et al. Hydrothermal carbonisation of sewage sludge for char production with different waste biomass: Effects of reaction temperature and energy recycling. Energy. 2017;127:167–174.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.03.116
109. Wang C, Gui B, Wu C, et al. Hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge coupled with Fenton oxidation pretreatment: Moderate oxidation to enhance hydrochar yield and properties. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2023;11:110788.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110788
110. Merzari F, Goldfarb J, Andreottola G, Mimmo T, Volpe M, Fiori L. Hydrothermal carbonization as a strategy for sewage sludge management: Influence of process withdrawal point on hydrochar properties. Energies. 2020;13:2890.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en13112890
111. Wilk M, Śliz M, Czerwińska K, Śledź M. The effect of an acid catalyst on the hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. J. Environ. Manag. 2023;345:118820.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118820
112. Wilk M, Gajek M, Śliz M, Czerwińska K, Lombardi L. Hydrothermal carbonization process of digestate from sewage sludge: Chemical and physical properties of hydrochar in terms of energy application. Energies. 2022;15:6499.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186499
113. Qi G, Wang X, Shen Y, et al. Effect of different flocculants on the characteristics of hydrochar and hydroliquid derived from the hydrothermal treated active sludge. A comparative study. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022;10:107514.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107514
114. Kim D, Lee K, Park KY. Upgrading the characteristics of biochar from cellulose, lignin, and xylan for solid biofuel production from biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016;42:95–100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.07.037
115. Tasca AL, Vitolo S, Gori R, Mannarino G, Galletti AMR, Puccini M. Hydrothermal carbonization of digested sewage sludge: The fate of heavy metals, PAHs, PCBs, dioxins and pesticides. Chemosphere. 2022;307:135997.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135997
116. Islam MT, Sultana AI, Chambers C, et al. Recent progress on emerging applications of hydrochar. Energies. 2022;15:9340.
https://doi.org/10.3390/en15249340
117. Djandja OS, Salami AA, Wang ZC, Duo J, Yin LX, Duan PG. Random forest-based modeling for insights on phosphorus content in hydrochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization of sewage sludge. Energy. 2022;245:123295.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.123295
118. Shi Y, Luo G, Rao Y, Chen H, Zhang S. Hydrothermal conversion of dewatered sewage sludge: Focusing on the transformation mechanism and recovery of phosphorus. Chemosphere. 2019;228:619–628.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.04.109
119. Feng Y, Ma K, Yu T, et al. Phosphorus transformation in hydrothermal pretreatment and steam gasification of sewage sludge. Energy Fuels. 2018;32:8545–8551.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01860
120. Zhao P, Shen Y, Ge S, Yoshikawa K. Energy recycling from sewage sludge by producing solid biofuel with hydrothermal carbonization. Energy Convers. Manag. 2014;78:815–821.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2013.11.026
121. Ghanim BM, Kwapinski W, Leahy JJ. Speciation of nutrients in hydrochar produced from hydrothermal carbonization of poultry litter under different treatment conditions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018;6:11265–11272.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b04768
122. Tangredi A, Barca C, Ferrasse JH, Boutin O. Effect of process parameters on phosphorus conversion pathways during hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge: A review. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;463:142342.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2023.142342
123. Huang HJ, Yuan XZ. The migration and transformation behaviors of heavy metals during the hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2016;200:991–998.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.10.099
124. Li B, Song H, Yang T, Liu E, Li R. Hydrothermal liquefaction of sewage sludge and model compound: Heavy metals distribution and behaviors. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis. 2023;169:105800.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2022.105800
125. Sarrion A, de la Rubia A, Coronella C, Mohedano AF, Diaz E. Acid-mediated hydrothermal treatment of sewage sludge for nutrient recovery. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;838:156494.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156494
126. Hitzl M, Corma A, Pomares F, Renz M. The hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) plant as a decentral biorefinery for wet biomass. Catal. Today. 2015;257:154–159.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2014.09.024
Table 1
Table 2
Table 3
|
|