AbstractIron minerals can significantly impact the performance of soil microbial fuel cells (Soil-MFCs) through extracellular electron transfer (EET). Introducing defects into iron minerals has been shown to reinforce the microbial dissolution process. In this study, oxygen-rich vacancy defects were successfully incorporated into hematite (DHem), resulting in enhanced Soil-MFCs performance. Voltage measurement and Polarization curves demonstrated that the addition of DHem yielded the highest electricity output of 408.96 mV and the highest power density of 324.97 mW/m2. Liquid chromatography revealed that the system with DHem exhibited the most effective phenanthrene degradation at 61.42%, with a 40.70% increase in degradation near cathode areas. The introduction of defects led to increased dissolution of Fe(II) in hematite. The dissolved Fe(II) showed a significant positive correlation with both electricity generation and phenanthrene degradation, confirming that the introduction of defects strengthened the long-distance electron transfer capability by enhancing the dissolution of hematite. In addition, after adding iron minerals, the abundance of Petrimonas, Pseudomonas, Trichococcus, and Azoarcus was increased, which were all important function microorganisms in the system. We concluded that the introduction of defects in hematite can enhance the overall performance of Soil-MFCs by enhance electron transfer and microbial community structure.
Graphical Abstract1. IntroductionPolycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are a class of refractory organic compounds composed of two or more benzene rings [1–2]. They widely present in the environment, exhibiting carcinogenicity, teratogenicity and genetic toxicity [3]. The accumulation in soil seriously affects the ecological environment safety and human life [4]. Therefore, treating soil containing PAHs is vitally important. Currently, bioremediation, especially the bioelectrochemical system, is an important soil PAHs removal method. It can enrich microorganisms [5–6], achieve energy conversion and biochemical metabolism through the electron transfer of microorganisms on the electrode [7–8], including microbial fuel cells (MFCs) [9], microbial electrosynthesis system (MES) [10], microbial desalination cell (MDC) [11], microbial reverse electrodialysis cell (MRC) [12], and microbial electrolysis cell (MEC) [13]. MFCs can use external anodes to enrich microorganisms, oxidize and degrade organic substrates and transfer electrons to terminal electron acceptors, simultaneously achieving electricity production and pollutant degradation [14–15], which is a sustainable polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon treatment method.
Despite the effectiveness of soil microbial fuel cells (Soil-MFCs) in pollutant removal [16–17], the soil’s low mass transfer rate and high internal resistance limit the electron transfer by electroactive bacteria, thus affecting the electric production and the removal effect of PAHs of the electrochemical system [18–19]. Previous studies on the performance improvement of Soil-MFCs have focused on optimizing device configuration and electrode material modification [20–21]. And the limited electron transfer between microorganisms and anodes or pollutants is also an important factor limiting system performance. The electroactive microorganisms in MFCs can metabolize to produce electrons, which can be transferred to the extracellular environment through specific pathways across the cell wall or membrane and transferred to extracellular electron acceptors. This process is called extracellular electron transfer (EET) [22]. It mainly includes two mechanisms: short-range direct electron transfer (DET) mediated by cell surface proteins or nanowires and long-range mediated electron transfer (MET) mediated by redox electron mediators (EMs) [23]. Enhancing the EET capacity is the key to improving the overall performance of Soil-MFCs. Adding exogenous electron mediators is a significant approach to effectively strengthen the EET process and increase the intensity and distance of electron transfer [24].
As an important part of soil semiconductor minerals, iron minerals in soil play a crucial role in microbial EET process [25]. Under anoxic conditions in natural soils, dissimilating iron-reducing bacterium, such as Shewanella [26–27] and Geobacter [28–29], can generate extracellular electrons and transfer electrons through the protein on the cell surface. The Fe(III) mineral phase is used as the terminal electron acceptor to reduce Fe(III) to dissolved Fe(II), and the microbial dissolution of iron minerals is realized [30–31].
The dissolved Fe(II) formed by the dissolution of the microbial process can be oxidized to Fe(III), and the electrons are transferred to the terminal electron acceptors such as anodes or pollutants. The electron transfer is realized through the redox cycle of high and low valence ions [32]. This process is an important mechanism for iron minerals to mediate EET. However, under neutral pH conditions, the reaction process of Fe(III) on the surface of iron minerals and extracellular electrons produced by dissimilating iron-reducing bacterium limits the dissolution of iron minerals [33], which limits the effect of iron minerals as electron mediators to mediate long-distance electron transfer.
Surface defects represent deviations from the strictly periodic arrangement of the lattice in the crystal. Their presence can alter both the crystallinity and surface active sites on minerals, consequently influencing the microbial dissolution process of Fe(III) minerals [34]. Both oxygen vacancies and iron vacancies can promote the dissolution of iron oxides. Although studies have shown that surface defects in iron minerals can promote microbial reduction and dissolution of Fe(III) [35], the enhancing effect of defect-containing iron minerals as electron mediators on extracellular electron transfer (EET) in soil environments remains relatively unexplored. Their potential to enhance power generation and removal of recalcitrant organic compounds in soil microbial fuel cells (MFCs), particularly for pollutants in the distant anode zone, warrants further investigation.
This study involved the development of a Soil-MFCs system utilizing hematite with engineered defects. Our objectives were twofold: 1) to elucidate the relationship between the construction of defects in hematite, microbial reduction of Fe(III), and the enhancement of extracellular electron transfer (EET) within the system; 2) to investigate the regulatory effects of defect engineering in iron minerals on electricity generation and the removal of pollutants.
2. Materials and Methods2.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Hematite with DefectsThe reduction-annealing method is a common approach for preparing metal oxides with oxygen vacancies. In a reducing atmosphere (hydrogen, carbon monoxide, hydrogen sulfide, etc.), iron minerals are subjected to heat treatment to partially reduce lattice oxygen, thereby introducing oxygen vacancies. Defects were introduced into hematite using high temperature hydrogenation [36] in this research. Nanohematite (Hem, 500 nm) was treated in a tubular furnace with H2 atmosphere heated to 400°C at a rate of 3°C/min and burned at 400°C for 3 h. Then the defective hematite (DHem) was obtained after annealing at room temperature.
The crystal structure alterations of Hem and DHem samples were obtained via X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis, utilizing Cu Kα radiation within 2θ angles of 20°–70°. The composition and content of mineral surface were examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS). Additionally, Raman spectroscopy was employed to characterize the minerals samples, employing a 632.8 nm HeNe laser source.
2.2. Experiment Soil PreparationThe experimental soil was obtained from the farmland of Jiangyin, Wuxi City, Jiangsu Province. The soil was dried, ground, and sieved for backup. Phenanthrene was completely dissolved in methanol and then mixed into the processed soil, continuously stirred for 30 minutes every 12 h for six times to allow complete uniform mixing into the soil and to ensure complete evaporation of methanol. The concentration of phenanthrene in the soil was 5 mg/kg based on the concentration level of PAHs in soil environment [37].
Hem and DHem were individually introduced into both the original soil and the phenanthrene-doped soil. They were then stirred continuously for 30 minutes every 12 hours, repeated four times to ensure thorough mixing. The soil contained a mass fraction of 3% iron oxide nanoparticles.
2.3. Construction of Soil-MFCsThe single-chamber air-cathode Soil-MFCs was used in this experiment, comprising a cylindrical glass chamber (40 mm diameter × 150 mm height). The device was divided into four parts from top to bottom. The lower level of the buffer soil layer was composed of unpolluted original soil (10 g). The anode, constructed of carbon felt wrapped around a stainless steel mesh (35 mm diameter), was positioned above this layer. About 180 g of experimental soil was filled in the soil layer above the anode. The air cathode was then placed above the soil. Both the anode and cathode were positioned in parallel. Titanium wire (0.8 mm diameter) connected the anode and cathode, completing the circuit. The anode and cathode were both made of a stainless steel mesh (35 mm diameter). The anode was wrapped with carbon felt on both sides. The anode carbon felt (40 mm diameter × 5 mm thickness), pretreated with acid and alkali washes for 12 h, and dried for backup [38–39]. The prepared carbon felt was inoculated with acclimated sludge from a wastewater treatment plant in Nanjing for 48 h.
To maintain microbial activity, 5 ml of nutrient solution (NaAc, 1 mol/L) was added weekly, and deionized water (1–2 mL) was added daily to keep the soil water saturated. A covering cloth was used to maintain light avoidance conditions. The experimental setup diagram is shown in Fig. S1(a), (c).
In this experiment, two groups were established using soil with only phenanthrene added: one operated under open-circuit conditions labeled as O-0, and the other under closed-circuit conditions labeled as C-0. Additional groups were formed, both under open and closed circuits, containing both the pollutant and two types of iron minerals to investigate the impact of introducing defects on the performance of hematite-reinforced Soil-MFCs. These groups were labeled as O-Hem, C-Hem, O-DHem, and C-DHem. The experimental grouping is shown in Fig. S2. At the beginning, the devices remained open circuit state. Successful construction was indicated by daily measurements of the device’s anode potential, and stability in potential was considered the start point. After successful construction, the system operated with a resistance of 1000 Ω based on the power output, microbial activity, and previous research [40–41]. The experiment ran for 42 days, divided into weekly cycles, with three replicates per group. Weekly destructive sampling involved removing, mixing, and freezing the soil from the device for subsequent analysis.
2.4. Testing and Analysis Methods2.4.1. Degradation effect of phenanthrene in the soilSoil samples mixed evenly were freeze-dried for 48 hours, and 1.000 g of each dried sample was dissolved in 20 ml of acetonitrile. The solution was then shaken at normal temperature for 24 hours, vortexed for 10 minutes, and ultrasonicated for 30 minutes. After centrifuging at 6000 rpm and 4°C for 5 minutes, the supernatant was collected. The supernatant, post-nitrogen blowing and acetonitrile reconstitution, was filtered (0.22 μm) and transferred to a 1.5 ml vial. Phenanthrene concentration was measured using a HITACHI Primaide high-performance liquid chromatograph with a C18 column (4.6150 mm, 5-Micron, Agilent) and a diode array detector (DAD). The mobile phase ratio was acetonitrile: water = 7:3, at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and a column temperature of 35°C, with a detection time of 12 minutes.
2.4.2. Electrochemical propertiesClosed-circuit voltages of the device were measured using a multimeter. Polarization curves were obtained by a static method; the device was disconnected for 12 hours, then the external resistance was varied from infinity to 50 Ω. After stabilizing each resistance value for 30 minutes, the voltage and current between the anode and cathode were measured. Polarization curves were plotted with current density on the x-axis and voltage on the y-axis. The slope of the linear portion of these curves represents the internal resistance of the Soil-MFCs. The power density curves were made with the current density on the x-axis and power density on the y-axis to obtain the maximum power density of the device.
2.4.3. Iron mineral analysisThe dissolved Fe(II) in soil was determined by the phenanthroline colorimetric method. 1.000 g of soil samples were dissolved in 20 ml of deionized water, extracted for 24 hours at room temperature, and centrifuged. 0.4 ml of the supernatant was placed in colorimetric tubes, mixed with 2.5 ml of 1 mol/L sodium acetate solution and 2.5 ml of 1 g/L benzoline, filled with deionized water to 25 ml, and then reacted. After 10 minutes of resting time, the absorbance at 510 nm was measured to determine the concentration of the dissolved Fe(II).
2.4.4. Microbial community structure analysisThe soil near the anode carbon felt was collected and subjected to high-throughput sequencing. Total DNA was extracted and purified from lyophilized soil samples (5 g) on days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, and 42 using the E.Z.N.A. soil DNA SPIN Kit (MP Biomedicals). The bacterial and archaeal universal primers 338F (ACTCCTACGGGAGCAG) and 806R (GGACTACNNGGGTATCTAAT) were used to assess bacterial community structure by PCR amplification of the V3-V4 regions in bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The sequences were clustered into operational taxonomic units (OTUs) by UPARSE at a 97% threshold. The soil samples were subjected to high-throughput sequencing by Major Bioinformatics Technology (Nanjing, China).
2.5. Statistical AnalysisStatistics of electrochemical performance, pollutant degradation and iron mineral dissolution during the experiment were plotted with origin 2018. XRD data was analyzed by Jade 6.0, PDF standard cards were exported, and relevant tables were calculated by origin 2018. XPS data was analyzed by Avantage. Potential correction was conducted with C elements, peak splitting fitting of Fe and O elements was carried, and element was analyzed in the full-scale XPS spectra.
3. Results and Discussion3.1. Characterization of MineralsThe XRD patterns of the two minerals are shown in Fig. 1(a). It can be observed that the XRD diffraction peaks of the original hematite sample were found at 33.2°, 35.6°, 40.9°, 49.5°, 54.01°, 57.6°, 62.4°, and 63.4°, corresponding respectively to the (104), (110), (113), (024), (116), (018), (214), and (300) crystal planes of hematite (α-Fe2O3, PDF#33-0664) [42]. Similarly, the XRD diffraction peaks of DHem were observed at 30.2°, 35.6°, 43.3°, 53.7°, 57.3°, and 62.9°, corresponding respectively to the (220), (311), (400), (422), (440), and (511) crystal planes of maghemite (γ-Fe2O3, PDF#39-1346) [43]. The change in mineral phase before and after modification indicates the alteration in the crystal structure of DHem. Raman spectra was obtained to further analyze the crystal structure (Fig. 1(b)). Six major characteristic peaks were observed for Hem, corresponding to two types of Raman-active optical modes (4Eg + 2Ag) of Fe2O3 [44–45]. Four of the peaks were attributed to Eg-symmetric vibrations, located at 238.62, 285.79, 400.76, and 600.69 cm−1, respectively. The remaining two peaks, located at 218.73 and 498.00, primarily originated from the Ag mode of Fe2O3. In the case of DHem, the six peak positions were slightly shifted, situated at 214.37, 252.21, 276.54, 394.53, 496.01, and 590.00 cm−1. The A2 peak intensity was significantly weakened, suggesting the pristine Fe2O3 lattice symmetry was damaged owing to the defects generated by the hydrogenation process.
To further characterize whether the surface defects of the minerals occur after hydrogenation, XPS was used to examine the chemical bonding and valence band positions of Hem and DHem. As shown in Fig. 1(c), the characteristic peaks of C, O, and Fe were shown, indicating that the samples were not doped with other elements and owned high purity. As illustrated in Fig. 1(d), three peaks of O 1s spectra were presented, namely Lattice oxygen (mainly Fe-O bond, Olat), Vacancy oxygen (Ovac), and Hydroxyl oxygen (O-H bond, Ohyd) [46]. Vacancy oxygen characterizes the presence of oxygen vacancies, indicating that the defects generated on the surface of hematite after high temperature annealing in hydrogen contain oxygen vacancies. After the modification, the Ovac area and the relative content of Ovac on the surface of DHem was significantly increased compared with Hem (Table S2). Two major peaks attributed to Fe 2p1/2 and Fe 2p3/2 states were shown in Fig. 1(e). After modification, the two primary bands were migrated to higher banding energies. Two other Fe2+ peaks appeared in DHem, and the ratio of the area of Fe2+ / Fe3+ was significantly higher than that in the Hem sample, further indicating the formation of defects.
The crystal structures of the two minerals were analyzed by XRD (Fig. S3). It can be seen that Hem was hematite phase, and the cell was hexagonal. Changes in the unit cell of DHem occurred after hydrogenation treatment, primarily consisting of hexagonal, tetrahedral, and octahedral cells. Based on the aforementioned characterization results, it can be inferred that the introduction of hydrogen induces the presence of oxygen vacancies, resulting in alterations to the spatial arrangement of lattice iron and oxygen ions due to the loss of oxygen atoms.
3.2. Dissolution of Iron Minerals in Soil and Influence on Electric PropertiesThe concentrations of dissolved Fe(II) in the soil were measured (Fig. 2(a)). The concentration of dissolved Fe(II) in the C-DHem group surpassed that of the C-Hem group during the experiment. The concentration of dissolved Fe(II) in the C-DHem group at the end of the experiment was 1.87 times higher than C-Hem (p < 0.05), showing that the introduction of defects can promote the dissolution of Fe(II) [35]. Defects can allow the mineral surface to present a complex steric coordination structure, increasing the active site on its surface, and may better facilitate the dissolution of Fe2+. During the first week of the reaction, microorganisms acclimated to the internal environment of MFCs by electrical stimulation [47]. Therefore, the microbial dissolution process of iron was not strong, and the concentration of dissolved Fe(II) in soil was low. In the second week, the concentration of dissolved Fe in the two groups was the highest, indicating that the microorganisms in the system achieved a greater survival advantage through the proliferation period and promoted the dissolution of iron. After the third week, the system tended to be stable [39]. The dissolved iron in the soil maintained a relatively stable content. Researches suggested that the redox cycling of dissolved Fe(II) and Fe(III) can enhance extracellular electron transfer, transferring more electrons to the anode for electricity generation, and to refractory organic matter for the reduction degradation of pollutants [48]. More dissolved Fe(II) may mean stronger EET capability in the system. Therefore, the construction of defects on hematite in soil-MFCs may reinforce the electroproduction and removal of organic pollutants. Thus, further exploration of the electricity production and pollutant removal of the system is warranted.
In the first 7 days after the device was kept open, the anode potential of each device continuously decreased and stabilized. During this process, microorganisms were enriched in the soil and continuously adapted to the soil environment. After connecting the resistance, the electricity generation performance of different group devices during the experiment was shown in Fig. 2. From Fig. 2(b)–(c), within the first 5 days, microorganisms need to adapt to the internal environment and reproduce, leading to a sustained increase in output voltage. After 5 days, the voltage of different devices fluctuated within a certain range (48.44 mV) in six weeks. The average voltages (42 d) were in the order of C-DHem (384.74 ± 48.44 mV) > C-Hem (324.38 ± 28.91 mV) > C-0 (278.61 ± 29.73 mV). At the same time, C-DHem had the maximum power density (324.97 mW/m2), 1.06 times that of C-Hem (305.54 mW/m2) and 1.22 times that of C-0 (266.22 mW/m2) (Fig. S4). Compared with other MFCs systems (Table. S1), C-DHem demonstrated a relatively reasonable power density through interconversion factors [49]. These results suggested that the addition of hematite significantly enhanced the output voltage of the Soil-MFCs (p < 0.05). Moreover, the introduction of defects further amplified this enhancement effect of hematite on the output voltage of the Soil-MFCs (p < 0.05), aligning with the observed increase in dissolved Fe(II) content as mentioned earlier. Building defects in hematite could increase the content of dissolved Fe(II), which may promote more extracellular electron transfer to the anode, thereby improving the electricity generation performance of the device.
Given the semiconductive inherent of iron minerals, it is speculated that the addition of oxide minerals may affect the internal structure of soil layer in Soil-MFCs, including internal resistance [47], organic matter [50], and pH to improve its electrical properties. Therefore, the polarization curves of different groups were measured to determine the change of the internal resistance. The results showed that the internal resistance of C-0 was the highest (292.12 Ω), approximately 1.26 times that of C-Hem (231.21 Ω), and 1.33 times that of C-DHem (219.83 Ω). This indicated that the addition of hematite can reduce the inherent internal resistance of the soil, thereby increasing conductivity and improving the electricity generation performance of the system. The introduction of defects alters the surface structure of hematite, enhancing the mineral’s electrical properties, which may be one of the reasons why DHem can better reduce the internal resistance of the soil compared to Hem.
3.3. Effect of DHem on Soil-MFCs for Phenanthrene Removal
Fig. 3 in the study depicted the overall efficiency of phenanthrene removal in Soil-MFCs during the operation. It demonstrated that even in the open-circuit group, a certain level of phenanthrene degradation was observed, with rates ranging from 38.23%–48.22%. This degradation likely results from natural degradation pathways, including adsorption hydrolysis of electrodes and soil and degradation of soil microorganisms. Among them, microorganisms play a major role in the degradation of the phenanthrene in the soil [51]. O-Hem (42.20%) and O-DHem (47.52%) resulted in a more effective degradation of phenanthrene compared to the control group O-0 (38.23%) (p < 0.05). This improvement is likely due to the adsorption degradation and facilitation of microbial degradation by the added iron minerals. Studies have shown that the defects site in iron minerals may affect the adsorption of organic pollutants [52], which may explain the better phenanthrene degradation effect in the O-DHem group than in the O-Hem. In closed-circuit groups, the degradation rates of phenanthrene were higher than in open-circuit groups, with C-DHem achieving the highest rate (61.42%), followed by C-Hem (53.94%) and C-0 (44.32%). This pattern suggested that Soil-MFCs promoted the degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons like phenanthrene. In the Soil-MFCs, the degradation rates of phenanthrene exhibited significant increases in both the C-Hem and C-DHem groups compared to the open-circuit group, with enhancements of 21.76% and 22.62%, respectively. This enhancement surpassed the control group’s improvement of 13.74%. The addition of hematite likely facilitates this increased degradation, and the enhancement could be further improved by the construction of defects on hematite, possibly due to DHem’s ability to release more Fe(II). Dissolved Fe(II) had a significant effect on electron output from the anode, and promoted electron transfer rate and electron transfer flux in soil [47]. This observation aligned with the experimental findings previously discussed.
Besides overpotential losses in the electrodes, electrode materials and Ohmic losses [53], due to the low mass transfer capacity of the soil, the extracellular electrons can only be transmitted in a limited space near the anode, resulting in a poor degradation effect of pollutants in the soil near the cathode [54]. The addition of electron mediators can improve the strength and distance of electron transport. Thus, we further explored the phenanthrene removal of the three soil areas of the device, within sampling points delineated in Fig. S1(b). It was found that the degradation effect of the phenanthrene in the near anode area was better than that in the middle and near cathode areas, which was related to the properties of the soil. In the closed-circuit group, the soil phenanthrene degradation rate was the highest in the C-DHem group and the lowest in the C-0 group during the experiment in each area. At the end of the experiment, the degradation rates of phenanthrene in near cathode areas were shown in Fig. 3(a) and 3(b), with C-DHem achieving the highest rate (60.71%), followed by C-Hem (50.96%), O-DHem (43.15%), C-0 (40.62%), O-Hem (40.49%), and O-0 (36.88%). It can be seen that the construction of defects on hematite can enhance pollutant removal in the near cathode area of Soil-MFCs. Due to changes in surface active sites and electrochemical properties, the defective area of DHem is more prone to dissolution [55]. Therefore, it can facilitate stronger and farther electron transfer, leading to more electrons being transferred to contaminants for their reduction and degradation. In the Soil-MFCs, the degradation rates of phenanthrene in near cathode areas were notably higher in the C-DHem groups compared to the open circuit group, with increases of 40.70%. This enhancement surpassed the improvements seen in the C-0 and C-Hem groups, which were 13.74% and 25.86%, respectively. This enhancement can be attributed to the degradation of microorganisms under the electrochemical system. In the Soil-MFCs system, the addition of hematite can enhance the capacity of the system for long-distance electron transport, while the construction of defects on hematite promoted the dissolution of iron minerals in the soil, making the better EET ability mediated by Fe(II) / Fe(III) redox cycles. Compared to C-0 and C-Hem, the phenanthrene far from the anode of C-Dem can better obtain the extracellular electrons produced by microorganisms near the anode by long-distance electron transport [56], realizing pollution reductive degradation.
3.4. Analysis of Microbial Community StructureAn analysis of the microbial communities in soil samples from various devices (within 1 cm of the anode) was conducted to investigate the overall improvement of Soil-MFCs performance by the construction of hematite defects at the microbial level. Fig. 4(a) illustrated the dominant microbial community composition at the phylum level (top 10 in abundance) at the end of operation, with a high proportion of Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Desulfobacterota, Bacteroidota, and Chloroflex in each group. These phyl are typical of microbial communities that are highly enriched in Soil-MFCs [57–59]. Firmicutes and Proteobacteria, rich in electrogens, can enhance the system’s electricity generation capabilities. The addition of iron minerals to MFCs increased the relative abundance of Firmicutes. Research showed Firmicutes was the common dominant phylum in MFCs [60]. Results suggested that iron minerals promoted their attachment to the anode and improved the electricity-generating performance of Soil-MFCs.
A comparison of microbial abundance at the genus level (top 30 in abundance) in different groups (Fig. 4(b)) showed increased abundance of Trichloromonas, Trichococcus, Thauera, Pseudomonas, Desulfobulbus, and Petrimonasin groups with added minerals compared to the control group. To investigate the response of various functional microbes in Soil-MFCs to different mineral additions, the dominant microbes were categorized into two types: 1) the dominant microorganisms that produce electricity and degrade PAHs, such as Pseudomonas, Trichococcusm, Azoarcus, and Trichloromonas; 2) dissimilating iron-reducing bacterium, such as Petrimonas and Thermincola. The relative abundance of dissimilating iron-reducing bacterium in the C-DHem group (0.056) was much higher than that in the C-Hem group (0.020). Thermincola has been reported to participate in the microbial reduction process of Fe(III) [61–63]. Petrimonas was also involved in the reduction process of iron. It indicated that hematite with defects can stimulate the enrichment of more dissimilating iron-reducing bacterium in Soil-MFCs, further explaining the better dissolution ability of DHem in soil in bioelectrochemical systems at the microbial level. Trichloromonas was proved to be an important electroproducing microorganism on the anode membrane [64]. Pseudomonas is an important electroproducing bacterium, and Pseudomonas inoculation has a good purification effect on the soil contaminated with PAHs [65–66]. Thauera is important for the aromatic compound-degrading bacteria [67]. Azoarcus was also reported to be an anaerobic biodegradome of aromatic compounds and a facultative endophyte [68]. The relative abundance of dominant microorganisms responsible for electricity generation and PAHs degradation in the closed groups adding iron minerals (0.789, 0.33) was higher compared to the C-0 group (0.293). This suggested that the addition of iron minerals can enhance the enrichment of electroactive microbes, consequently improving the electricity generation and pollutant degradation performance of Soil-MFCs. In the C-0 group, Trichloromonas was the main electroactive microorganism. After the addition of hematite, the relative abundance of Trichococcus and Pseudomonas increased. The relative abundance of Azoarcus increased after introducing the defects into hematite, showing that hematite affected the overall performance of Soil-MFCs by affecting different functional microorganisms.
3.5. Possible Pathway for Construction of Defects in Hematite to Promote Electrical Generation and Pollutant Degradation in Soil-MFCsCorrelation analysis was performed to analyze the diversity of microbial communities, the state of dissolved iron, the electricity-generating performance of the system, and the degradation rate of phenanthrene during the reaction process (Table S3). The possible pathway for the construction of defects on hematite to promote the Soil-MFCs can be obtained. It can be seen that the introduction of defects in hematite can promote mineral dissolution through changes in its own structure, as well as affecting the abundance of dissimilating iron-reducing bacterium in the soil (0.478). More dissolved Fe(II) can significantly promote the electrical production (0.867) and the removal of phenanthrene (0.796) by strengthening EET. The extracellular electrons produced by microbial degradation of substrates can be accepted by iron minerals. Dissolved Fe(II) accepts electrons, which are then transferred to the anode for electricity generation in the system, or transferred to contaminants for their reduction and degradation. Simultaneously, Fe(II) is oxidized to solid Fe(III), completing the cycle of oxidation-reduction. Through this cyclic process, electron transfer is continuously mediated, enabling long-distance electron transfer. Additionally, the relevant functional microorganisms play important roles in this process.
4. ConclusionsIn this study, the addition of nanohematite was found to enhance both electrical production and the degradation of PAHs like phenanthrene of Soil-MFCs. Introducing defects in hematite by hydrogenation proved particularly effective in enhancing the overall system performance and improving pollutant removal, especially in the near cathode area of Soil-MFCs. These defects altered the surface properties of hematite, enhancing its microbial dissolution in soil. The increased presence of dissolved Fe(II) facilitated stronger and more extensive EET by redox cycles, leading more efficient electron transfer to the anode for electricity generation and to contaminants for degradation. In addition, the microbial community structure in system was also impacted to strengthen the ability of electricity production and pollutant removal of Soil-MFCs.
AcknowledgmentsThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42077108).
NotesAuthor Contributions X.J. (Master student) conducted the experiment and wrote the first draft, X.G. (Ph.D student) directed the research, K.Y. (Master student) helped in material characterization, J.H. (Master student) participated in the coordination of the study, X.C. (Ph.D) and T.S. (Professor) helped in drafting the manuscript, and X.L. (Professor) supervised, final checking and draft approval. References1. Xu X, Wu Y, Xiao Q, et al. Simultaneous removal of NOX and SO2 from flue gas in an integrated FGD-CABR system by sulfur cycling-mediated Fe(II)EDTA regeneration. Environ. Res. 2022;205:112541.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112541
2. Ren Y, Zhou B, Tao J, et al. Composition and size distribution of airborne particulate PAHs and oxygenated PAHs in two Chinese megacities. Atmos. Res. 2017;183:322–330.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2016.09.015
3. Yang F, Zhang Q, Guo H, Zhang S. Evaluation of Cytotoxicity, Genotoxicity and Teratogenicity of Marine Sediments from Qingdao Coastal Areas Using in Vitro Fish Cell Assay, Comet Assay and Zebrafish Embryo Test. Toxicol. In Vitro. 2010;24:2003–2011.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2010.07.019
4. Singh DK, Gupta T. Effect through inhalation on human health of PM1 bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons collected from foggy days in northern part of India. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016;306:257–268.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.11.049
5. Sonawane JM, Yadav A, Ghosh PC, Adeloju SB. Recent advances in the development and utilization of modern anode materials for high performance microbial fuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017;90:558–576.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110404
6. Zhang Z, Guo H, Sun J, Gong X, Wang C, Wang H. Exploration of the biotransformation processes in the biodegradation of phenanthrene by a facultative anaerobe, strain PheF2, with Fe(III) or O2 as an electron acceptor. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;750:142245.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142245
7. Paquete CM, Morgado L, Salgueiro CA, Louro RO. Molecular Mechanisms of Microbial Extracellular Electron Transfer: The Importance of Multiheme Cytochromes. Front. Biosci (Landmark Ed). 2022;279:174.
https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbl2706174
8. Wang L, Lin Z, Liu S, et al. The effect of extracellular electron transfer on arsenic speciation transformation in a soil bioelectrochemical system. Soil Tillage Res. 2020;204:104723.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104723
9. Jung SP, Yoon MH, Lee SM, Oh SE, Kang H, Yang JK. Power Generation and Anode Bacterial Community Compositions of Sediment Fuel Cells Differing in Anode Materials and Carbon Sources. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2014;9:315–326.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)07719-2
10. Karthic A, Pandit S, Khilari S, Mathuriya AS, Jung SP. Microbial Electrosynthesis for Harnessing Value-Added Product via Carbon Dioxide Sequestering. Kumar P, Kuppam C, editorsBioelectrochemical Systems. Springer Singapore; Singapore: 2020. p. 277–298.
11. Zahid M, Savla N, Pandit S, et al. Microbial desalination cell: Desalination through conserving energy. Desalination. 2022;521:115381.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2021.115381
12. Kang H, Kim E, Jung SP. Influence of flowrates to a reverse electro-dialysis (RED) stack on performance and electrochemistry of a microbial reverse electrodialysis cell (MRC). Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42:27685–27692.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.187
13. Son S, Koo B, Chai H, Tran H, Pandit S, Jung SP. Comparison of hydrogen production and system performance in a microbial electrolysis cell containing cathodes made of non-platinum catalysts and binders. J. Water Process. Eng. 2021;40:101844.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101844
14. Wang X, Cai Z, Zhou Q, Zhang Z, Chen C. Bioelectrochemical stimulation of petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in saline soil using U-tube microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012;109:426–433.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23351
15. Huang DY, Zhou SG, Chen Q, Zhao B, Yuan Y, Zhuang L. Enhanced anaerobic degradation of organic pollutants in a soil microbial fuel cell. Chem. Eng. J. 2011;172:647–653.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2011.06.024
16. Yu B, Tian J, Feng L. Remediation of PAH polluted soils using a soil microbial fuel cell: Influence of electrode interval and role of microbial community. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017;336:110–118.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.04.066
17. Ma J, Zhang Q, Chen F, Lu S, Wang Y, Liang H. Simultaneous removal of copper and biodegradation of BDE-209 with soil microbial fuel cells. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:105593.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.105593
18. Li X, Wang X, Zhao Q, Wan L, Li Y, Zhou Q. Carbon fiber enhanced bioelectricity generation in soil microbial fuel cells. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2016;85:135–141.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2016.05.001
19. Zhang YT, Zhang Y, Peng L. Electrochemical fluorescence microscopy reveals insignificant long-range extracellular electron transfer in Shewanella oneidensis anodic processes. Electrochim. Acta. 2021;398:139305.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2021.139305
20. Koo B, Jung SP. Improvement of air cathode performance in microbial fuel cells by using catalysts made by binding metal-organic framework and activated carbon through ultrasonication and solution precipitation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;424:130388.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.130388
21. Koo B, Lee SM, Oh SE, et al. Addition of reduced graphene oxide to an activated-carbon cathode increases electrical power generation of a microbial fuel cell by enhancing cathodic performance. Electrochim. Acta. 2019;297:613–622.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.12.024
22. Peng L, Shi Z, Wang P, et al. A novel multi-reaction model for kinetics of Zn release from soils: Roles of soil binding sites. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018;514:146–155.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2017.12.006
23. Naaz T, Kumar A, Vempaty A, et al. Recent advances in biological approaches towards anode biofilm engineering for improvement of extracellular electron transfer in microbial fuel cells. Environ. Eng. Res. 2023;28:220666.
https://doi.org/10.4491/eer.2022.666
24. Rahimnejad M, Najafpour GD, Ghoreyshi AA, et al. Thionine increases electricity generation from microbial fuel cell using Saccharomyces cerevisiae and exoelectrogenic mixed culture. J. Microbiol. 2012;50:575–580.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-012-2135-0
25. Shi L, Dong H, Reguera G, et al. Extracellular electron transfer mechanisms between microorganisms and minerals. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2016;14:651–662.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro.2016.93
26. Jung SP. Impedance Analysis of Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA, Shewanella oneidensis MR-1, and their Coculture in Bioeletrochemical Systems. Electrochem. Sci. 2012;7:11091–11100.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1452-3981(23)16929-X
27. Marsili E, Baron DB, Shikhare ID, Coursolle D, Gralnick JA, Bond DR. Shewanella secretes flavins that mediate extracellular electron transfer. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2008;105:3968–73.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0710525105
28. Marsili E, Rollefson JB, Baron DB, Hozalski RM, Bond DR. Microbial Biofilm Voltammetry: Direct Electrochemical Characterization of Catalytic Electrode-Attached Biofilms. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2008;74:7239–7337.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00177-08
29. Bond DR, Lovley DR. Electricity production by Geobacter sulfurreducens attached to electrodes. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2003;69:1548–1555.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.69.3.1548-1555.2003
30. Poggenburg C, Mikutta R, Sander M, et al. Microbial reduction of ferrihydrite-organic matter coprecipitates by Shewanella putrefaciens and Geobacter metallireducens in comparison to mediated electrochemical reduction. Chem. Geol. 2016;447:133–47.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.09.031
31. Meite F, Hauet T, Billard P, Ferte T, Abdelmoula M, Zegeye A. Insight into the magnetic properties of Pb-dopped iron oxide nanoparticles during Fe(III) bio-reduction by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Chem. Geol. 2022;606:120904.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.120904
32. Straub KL, Benz M, Schink B. Iron metabolism in anoxic environments at near neutral pH. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2001;34:181–186.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00768.x
33. Jiang J, Kappler A. Kinetics of microbial and chemical reduction of humic substances: implications for electron shuttling. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2008;42:3563–3569.
https://doi.org/10.1021/es7023803
34. Cutting RS, Coker VS, Fellowes JW, Lloyd JR, Vaughan DJ. Mineralogical and morphological constraints on the reduction of Fe(III) minerals by Geobacter sulfurreducens
. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta. 2009;73:4004–22.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2009.04.009
35. Notini L, Byrne JM, Tomaszewski EJ, et al. Mineral Defects Enhance Bioavailability of Goethite toward Microbial Fe(III) Reduction. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019;53:8883–8891.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.9b03208
36. Li Z, Wu J, Liao L, et al. Surface engineering of hematite nanorods photoanode towards optimized photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;626:879–888.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2022.07.018
37. Wilcke W. Global patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soil. Geoderma. 2007;141:157–166.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2007.07.007
38. Jung SP, Kim E, Koo B. Effects of wire-type and mesh-type anode current collectors on performance and electrochemistry of microbial fuel cells. Chemosphere. 2018;209:542–550.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.06.070
39. Tran HVH, Kim E, Jung SP. Anode biofilm maturation time, stable cell performance time, and time-course electrochemistry in a single-chamber microbial fuel cell with a brush-anode. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2022;106:269–278.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.11.001
40. Kang H, Jeong J, Gupta PL, Jung SP. Effects of brush-anode configurations on performance and electrochemistry of microbial fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy. 2017;42:27693–27700.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.181
41. Jung S, Regan JM. Influence of External Resistance on Electrogenesis, Methanogenesis, and Anode Prokaryotic Communities in Microbial Fuel Cells. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2011;77:564–571.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01392-10
42. Schimanke G, Martin M. In situ XRD study of the phase transition of nanocrystalline maghemite (γ-Fe2O3) to hematite (α-Fe2O3). Solid State Ionics. 2000;136:1235–1240.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(00)00593-2
43. Wu Q, Liu Y, Jing H, et al. Peculiar synergetic effect of γ-Fe2O3 nanoparticles and graphene oxide on MIL-53 (Fe) for boosting photocatalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2020;390:124615.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124615
44. Ling Y, Wang G, Reddy J, Wang C, Zhang JZ, Li Y. The influence of oxygen content on the thermal activation of hematite nanowires. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:4074–4079.
https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201107467
45. Mirbagheri N, Wang D, Peng C, et al. Visible Light Driven Photoelectrochemical Water Oxidation by Zn- and Ti-Doped Hematite Nanostructures. Acs Catal. 2014;4:2006–2015.
https://doi.org/10.1021/cs500372v
46. Xia C, Cai Y, Ma Y, et al. Natural Mineral-Based Solid Oxide Fuel Cell with Heterogeneous Nanocomposite Derived from Hematite and Rare-Earth Minerals. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2016;8:20748–20755.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b05694
47. Zhang J, Huang S, Yin Y, et al. Fe2O3 micron particles are critical for electron transfer and the distribution of electrochemically active bacteria in soil MFCs. Sci Total Environ. 2023;893.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.164909
48. Dong G, Chen Y, Yan Z, et al. Recent advances in the roles of minerals for enhanced microbial extracellular electron transfer. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2020;134:110404.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110404
49. Jung SP, Son S, Koo B. Reproducible polarization test methods and fair evaluation of polarization data by using interconversion factors in a single chamber cubic microbial fuel cell with a brush anode. J. Clean. Prod. 2023;390:136157.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136157
50. Li M, Li J, Zhao L, Liu S, Wang Y, Bian H. Effects of exogenous Fe addition on soil respiration rate and dissolved organic carbon structure in temperate forest swamps of northeastern China. Environ. Res. 2023;216:114800.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.114800
51. Tian H, Liu Z, Zhao L, Li H. Natural degradation characteristics of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons phenanthrene in soil. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2015;9:4055–4060.
https://doi.org/10.12030/j.cjee.20150875
52. Zhang Q, Zhou J, Zhang L, Zhong S, Ru X, Shu X. Sulfur defect and Fe(III) (hydr)oxides on pyrite surface mediate tylosin adsorption in lake water: effect of solution chemistry and dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022;29:90248–90258.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22140-7
53. Jung S, Ahn YH, Oh SE, et al. Impedance and Thermodynamic Analysis of Bioanode, Abiotic Anode, and Riboflavin-Amended Anode in Microbial Fuel Cells. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012;33:3349–3354.
https://doi.org/10.5012/bkcs.2012.33.10.3349
54. Wang X, Cai Z, Zhou Q, Zhang Z, Chen C. Bioelectrochemical stimulation of petroleum hydrocarbon degradation in saline soil using U-tube microbial fuel cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2012;109:426–433.
https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.23351
55. Tan H, Wang J, Yu S, Zhou K. Support Morphology-Dependent Catalytic Activity of Pd/CeO2 for Formaldehyde Oxidation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015;49:8675–8682.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01264
56. Ambaye TG, Vaccari M, Franzetti A, et al. Microbial electrochemical bioremediation of petroleum hydrocarbons (PHCs) pollution: Recent advances and outlook. Chem. Eng. J. 2023;452:139372.
https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01264
57. Chen J, Hu Y, Zhang L, Huang W, Sun J. Bacterial community shift and improved performance induced by in situ preparing dual graphene modified bioelectrode in microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol. 2017;238:273–280.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.044
58. He P, Zhang C, Liu J, Bai J, Lu J, Hou B. Simultaneous nitrogen and sulfur removal performance and microbial community changes of dual-anode chamber methane microbial fuel cells. Microbiol. China. 2023;50:1010–1022.
https://doi.org/10.13344/j.microbiol.china.220886
59. Dai M, Zhang Y, Wu Y, Sun R, Zong W, Kong Q. Mechanism involved in the treatment of sulfamethoxazole in wastewater using a constructed wetland microbial fuel cell system. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:106193.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2021.106193
60. Zhang SH, Qiu CH, Fang CF, et al. Characterization of Bacterial Communities in Anode Microbial Fuel Cells Fed with Glucose, Propyl Alcohol and Methanol. Appl. Biochem. Microb. 2017;53:250–257.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S0003683817020193
61. Zavarzina DG, Sokolova TG, Tourova TP, Chernyh NA, Kostrikina NA, Bonch-Osmolovskaya EA. Thermincola ferriacetica sp. nov., a new anaerobic, thermophilic, facultatively chemolithoautotrophic bacterium capable of dissimilatory Fe(III) reduction. Extremophiles. 2007;11:1–7.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00792-006-0004-7
62. Kato S, Wada K, Kitagawa W, et al. Conductive Iron Oxides Promote Methanogenic Acetate Degradation by Microbial Communities in a High-Temperature Petroleum Reservoir. Microbes Environ. 2019;34:95–98.
https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME18140
63. Koksharov YA, Chistyakova NI, Zavarzina DG, Treninkov IA, Polyakov SN, Rusakov VS. EMR Spectra of Iron-based Nanoparticles Produced by Dissimilatory Bacteria. Solid State Phenom. 2009;152–153:415–418.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/SSP.152-153.415
64. Wang N, Yang Y, Xu K, et al. Distinguishing anaerobic digestion from electrochemical anaerobic digestion: Metabolic pathways and the role of the microbial community. Chemosphere. 2023;326:138492.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138492
65. Martínez-Toledo Á, Del Carmen Cuevas-Díaz M, Guzmán-López O, López-Luna J, Ilizaliturri-Hernández C. Evaluation of in situ biosurfactant production by inoculum of P. putida and nutrient addition for the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from aged oil-polluted soil. Biodegradation. 2022;33:135–155.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10532-022-09973-2
66. Logan BE, Rossi R, Ragab A, Saikaly PE. Electroactive microorganisms in bioelectrochemical systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2019;17:307–319.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-019-0173-x
67. Mao Y, Zhang X, Xia X, Zhong H, Zhao L. Versatile aromatic compound-degrading capacity and microdiversity of Thauera strains isolated from a coking wastewater treatment bioreactor. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010;37:927–934.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-010-0740-7
|
|