| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 26(2); 2021 > Article
Konkol, Cebula, and Cenian: Oxidization of hydrogen sulphide in biogas by manganese (IV) oxide particles


Hydrogen sulphide is corrosive to most metallic equipment such as pipelines, compressors, gas storage tanks, engines, turbines and other units. It acts as a strong poison for fuel cells and its combustion leads to SO2 emissions. Due to the problems associated with hydrogen sulphide, it is critical to remove it from biogas before further processing. The removal of hydrogen sulphide from biogas using MnO2, which acts as a sorbent and catalyst, was investigated. The research was conducted in a full-scale agriculture biogas plant using chicken manure and maize silage as substrate. The manganese dioxide (manganese (IV) oxide) was derived from the waste products of a water conditioning system, after manganese removal from drinking water. The obtained results showed significantly better adsorption of hydrogen sulphide and faster regeneration of the bed compared to the bed filled with hydrated iron oxides. The H2S concentration in the treated biogas dropped from about 1,650 to 0–5 ppm.

1. Introduction

Biogas is a very important source of renewable methane. It is produced during anaerobic fermentation of biomass in the presence of anaerobic microorganisms. Anaerobic digestion is a series of metabolic processes conducted by various groups of microorganisms in different temperature and time intervals [15].
Before biogas can be used as a source of energy for generating e.g. heat and/or electricity, hydrogen sulphide must be removed. The amount of H2S in crude biogas usually ranges from 50 to 5,000 ppm, but can reach even 20,000 ppm (2%) in some cases [6, 7]. It is a colourless, flammable, malodourous, toxic gas in high concentrations [6, 8, 9]. The removal of H2S is critical to successful applications in combustion techniques, mainly to prevent problems such as corrosion of pipes, turbines and other units [7]. The required degree of purification of biogas depends on its intended use, e.g. in fuel cells or combustion engines. For trouble-free operation of combined heat and power units, the hydrogen sulphide concentration in the biogas must be lower than 0.01 to 0.03%v/v, depending on the equipment concerned [10].
In general, the H2S removal-methods can be classified as: physical using solubility in water and sorbents [11, 12], chemical based on chemical reactions [2, 13, 14] and biological using microorganisms [1517] or a combination of these [18, 19]. As all the methods have advantages and disadvantages, new and improved solutions are investigated.
Jędrczak [20] discussed other methods of H2S removal from biogas, which are based on: dosing FeCl3 to a digestion chamber or air to biogas, absorption of chemicals binding H2S in solutions, absorption-oxidation process, biological methods with bio-filters and adsorption on activated carbon and alkaline iron oxidize beds. Sisani et al. [21], however classified H2S removal methods as wet/dry process and membrane process. The effect of dosing iron salts (in the form of FeCl2, FeCl3 or FeSO4) into the digester is to transform hydrogen sulphide into insoluble iron sulphide. This method is used for high concentrations of H2S and allows its content to be reduced to about 70 ppm. The advantage of this method is low operating and investment costs [7, 20, 22].
Though rapid and effective, the physical and chemical methods for H2S removal are costly and produce secondary wastes, which in turn gives rise to another pollution problem [19]. By using biological processes it is possible to avoid these problems. Besides, they can achieve a greater degree of desulphurization and generate by-products (S0) that can be used in other industrial processes [23]. Ho et al. [18] proposed a system, where the first stage is H2S oxidizing by ferric iron to generate S0, then the ferrous iron is oxidized by iron-oxidizing bacteria.
The direct dosing of air or oxygen into the digester was proposed in order to carry out both the production and desulphurization of biogas in a single unit. The process is based on biochemical reactions, i.e. under O2-limiting conditions sulphide-oxidizing bacteria oxidise sulphide to S0 [2426].
The adsorption process is a promising technology, therefore much effort is being expended searching for new types of adsorbents, an important factor for the process efficiency. Adsorbents are porous solids with highly developed surface area available for adsorption; they are characterized by different surface properties.
Adsorption processes among others include absorption using raw zeolites or with e.g. TiO2 [27, 28], biochar [2931], metal active sorbents [3234] and activated carbon is one of the most suitable methods for removal of hydrogen sulphide from biogas. But, its high operational costs have promoted the search for low-cost alternative adsorbents using natural materials (wood, peat, coal, lignite) as well as industrial/agricultural/domestic wastes or byproducts, such as slag, sludge, fly ash or red mud [3540].
Generally, activated carbon used for H2S removal is modified with chemicals or oxidative agents, to promote oxidation of H2S to elemental sulphur [22, 37, 39]. The desulphurization performance of different metallic oxides on activated carbon decreases in the order: Mn > Cu > Fe > Ce > Co > V. The desulphurization performance using metal oxides was markedly improved [41, 42].
For example, potassium permanganate (KMnO4) is a strong oxidizing agent, it can be used in sewers to reduce corrosion problems and odor development [12, 43], for toxin removal from water [44, 45], for biogas purification [46] as well as sulphide removal from air [47]. Manganese dioxide is also active in the removal of sulphide [42, 4851]. It was furthermore found that H2S reacts significantly faster with KMnO4 than with MnO2 [52], but the complex reactions between KMnO4 and H2S are still not clearly understood [12].
The importance of MnO2 for hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas can be seen in the following reactions, where MnO2 can react with H2S non-catalytically (Eq. (1)) or catalytically (Eq. (2)) [12]
As an alkaline sorbent for SO2 removal, limestone, quick lime and hydrated lime or slaked lime are commonly used [50, 53, 54]. Positive impact of hydrated lime was observed on reducing hydrogen sulphide emissions [55], calcium-based sorbents were also used for H2S removal from hot coal gas [56]. Hydrated lime can be obtained from the calcination of abundant and low cost raw materials such as calcitic or dolomitic limestone. The calcination of these materials implies the formation of a porous structure resulting from the release of CO2 and H2O [57].
Zhang et al. [49] used a series of adsorbents based on manganese oxide supported on mesoporous MCM-41 at different calcinations temperatures for removal of H2S from natural gas at low temperatures. The results of desulfurization experiments have shown that the adsorbent calcinated at 550°C exhibited the best desulfurization performance, with Mn present in the form of Mn2O3. The saturated H2S capacity reached 28.65 mg/g at an adsorption temperature of 25°C.
Zhang et al. [51] studied the effect of preparation conditions on hydrogen sulphide removal activity of manganese dioxide-loaded activated carbon (AC) from model gas with a low concentration of H2S. The removal of H2S has been improved significantly after modification by manganese dioxide. A suitable H2S removal activity was obtained with adsorbent of MnO2/AC-1:1.
In the present study, the removal of hydrogen sulphide from biogas using manganese (IV) oxide and hydrated lime as an adsorbent in operating a biogas plant was studied. Beech wood chips were used as a structure material. The efficiency of removing hydrogen sulphide from biogas using the mentioned absorbent was investigated. To our knowledge, there are no studies relating to the removal of hydrogen sulphide using manganese oxide and lime, as well as wood chips as a structural material.

2. Material and Methods

The research was carried out in a full-scale agricultural biogas plant located at a broiler farm in the Subcarpathian region (Poland). The biogas plant works using chicken manure and maize silage as substrates under mesophilic conditions with a working volume of 2,500 m3 and hydraulic retention time of 52 days. The biogas plant produces about 100 m3/h of biogas. Hydrogen sulphide in the biogas ranges from about 1,000 to 3,500 ppm.
During experiments a new absorption bed consisting of manganese oxide and hydrated lime was used. The manganese dioxide applied during full scale experiments was a catalytic bed used to remove manganese from groundwater in a water treatment plant.
The chemical composition of the catalytic bed used is shown in Table 1. Its structure is presented in Fig. 1. The MnO2 used in the adsorber had numerous cracks (fissures), which caused an increase in the active oxide surface.
The absorber bed for the biogas plant was made by mixing manganese (IV) oxide and hydrated lime, the components were mixed in the ratio two to one (by weight), respectively. Mixing manganese (IV) oxide with lime in a ratio of 2 to 1 results from the preference for using oxidizing properties over sorption properties. Alkali (calcium hydroxide) binds hydrogen sulphide which has acidic properties, the following reactions takes place (Eq. (3) and (4)):
Then calcium sulphide is oxidized (Eq. (5)):
The following reactions occur in an aquatic environment (Eq. (6) and (7)):
The large surface area of the catalyst and catalytic agent promotes the oxidation of hydrogen sulphide.
Beech wood chips about 10x5x1 mm were used as a structure material. The total content of chips in the desulfurizer was 90%. Basic information about the hydrogen sulphide removal process is provided in the Table 2.
Removal of hydrogen sulphide from biogas depends not only on the concentration of MnO2 but also on the size of its grains. The smaller the grains, the larger the biogas flow resistance through the bed, but the more efficient the removal of hydrogen sulphide. To improve the efficiency of hydrogen sulphide removal air was introduced into the gas space in the digester. The volume of air was measured using a rotameter. The oxygen content in the fermentation chamber as well as at individual levels of the desulfurizer was determined using a gas analyzer. Hydrogen sulphide measurements were carried out using a portable gas analyzer (GA5000, Geotech). The analyzer had ATEX II 2G Ex ib IIA T1 Gb (Ta= −10°C to +50°C), IECEx and CSA quality certifications and UKAS ISO 17025 calibration certificate. The system allows determination of oxygen and hydrogen sulphide in the following ranges O2: 0–25%, and H2S: 0–5,000 ppm. Calibration of the device was performed before experiments using calibration gases −1,000 ppm H2S, while oxygen sensor was performed by synthetic air.
The removal efficiency of hydrogen sulphide was determined using the following Eq. (8):
where cinlet – H2S concentration in raw biogas before adsorption bed, coutlet – H2S concentration in biogas after passing the adsorption bed.

3. Results and Discussion

Fig. 2 presents concentrations of hydrogen sulphide in biogas and their dependence on air content in the digester. The concentration of hydrogen sulphide in raw biogas ranged from 1,080 to 1,850 ppm. The H2S content in the upgraded biogas after treatment ranged from 2–640 ppm, depending on the oxygen concentration in the digester. The efficiency of hydrogen sulphide removal depending on the oxygen concentration is also shown in Fig. 2. It was observed that as the concentration of oxygen in the fermentation chamber increases, the efficiency of hydrogen sulphide removal also increases. For 0.5% concentration of oxygen, the efficiency was about 41%. Increasing the oxygen concentration to 0.9% the efficiency of H2S removal is more than doubled. For oxygen concentrations from 1 to 1.9%, the removal efficiency was approaching 99.5%.
During the removal of hydrogen sulphide from biogas, intermediate sulphur compounds are produced: S, S2, SH, HS2, H2S2, SO, S2O, HSO, HOS, HSO2, HOSO2, (HSO)2, SO2, SO3 [16].
The generated elemental sulphur after half a year bed operation, limited the access of hydrogen sulphide to the catalyst and hydrogen sulphide concentration at the outlet increased to 45 ppm. The adsorbent bed should therefore be replaced. The sulfur content of the bed after depletion of sorption properties is up to 50 g/kg bed. The bed with precipitated sulphur is shown in Fig. 3. Accumulation of sulfur was observed from the side of biogas impact deeper into the deposit, but Goldnik and Turek [12] assumed that sulphur is distributed all over the adsorption bed.

4. Conclusions

There are many technologies solving the problem of hydrogen sulphide separation from biogas, but because of the high cost of investment and operation, the profitability of biogas production is significantly reduced. In this regard the presented experimental results seem very interesting. Adsorbent with manganese oxide, hydrated lime and wood chips were used to remove hydrogen sulphide from biogas. The adsorbent used proved to be very effective; almost 100% efficiency of hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas was obtained. The materials used to compose the adsorption bed are cheap and readily available, which makes such systems of biogas purification economically feasible.


This research has been supported by the European Regional Development Fund within the Interreg South Baltic Programme 2014–2020, under project no. WASTEMAN STHB.02.02.00-0131/17 and Provincial Fund for Environmental Protection and Water Management in Gdansk under project no. WFOŚ/D/748/20/2018.


Author Contributions

I.K. (Ph.D Student) carried out the experiments, discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. J.C. (Dr. Sc. Eng.) carried out the experiments, discussed the results, supported manuscript writing. A.C. (Professor) supervised the project, discussed the results and supported manuscript writing and verification.


1. Prasertsan S, Sajjakulnukit B. Biomass and biogas energy in Thailand: Potential, opportunity and barriers. Renew Energ. 2006;31:599–610.

2. Tippayawong N, Thanompongchart P. Biogas quality upgrade by simultaneous removal of CO2 and H2S in a packed column reactor. Energy. 2010;35:4531–4535.

3. Mao C, Feng Y, Wang X, Ren G. Review on research achievements of biogas from anaerobic digestion. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2015;45:540–555.

4. Mata-Alvarez J, Dosta J, Romero-Güiza MS, Fonoll X, Peces M, Astals S. A critical review on anaerobic co-digestion achievements between 2010 and 2013. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;36:412–427.

5. Zhang Q, Hu J, Lee DJ. Biogas from anaerobic digestion processes: Research updates. Renew Energ. 2016;98:108–119.

6. Dumont E. H2S removal from biogas using bioreactors: a review. Int J Energ Environ. 2015;6:479–498.

7. Kwaśny J, Balcerzak W. Sorbents used for biogas desulfurization in the adsorption process. Polish J Environ Stud. 2016;25:37–43.

8. Li Q, Lancaster JR. Chemical foundations of hydrogen sulfide biology. Nitric Oxide. 2013;35:21–34.

9. Lar JS, Li X. Removal of H2S during anaerobic bioconversion of dairy manure. Chinese J Chem Eng. 2009;17:273–277.

10. Peu P, Picard S, Diara A, et al. Prediction of hydrogen sulphide production during anaerobic digestion of organic substrates. Bioresour Technol. 2012;121:419–424.

11. Raabe T, Mehne M, Rasser H, Krause H, Kureti S. Study on iron-based adsorbents for alternating removal of H2S and O2 from natural gas and biogas. Chem Eng J. 2019;371:738–749.

12. Goldnik E, Turek T. Removal of hydrogen sulfide by permanganate based sorbents: Experimental investigation and reactor modeling. Chem Eng Sci. 2016;151:51–63.

13. Wang Y, Wang Z, Pan J, Liu Y. Removal of gaseous hydrogen sulfide using Fenton reagent in a spraying reactor. Fuel. 2019;239:70–75.

14. Cebula J. Biogas purifiaction by sorption techniques. Archit Civ Eng Environ. 2009;2:95–104.

15. Fernández M, Ramírez M, Gómez JM, Cantero D. Biogas biodesulfurization in an anoxic biotrickling filter packed with open-pore polyurethane foam. J Hazard Mater. 2014;264:529–535.

16. Vikrant K, Kailasa SK, Tsang DCW, et al. Biofiltration of hydrogen sulfide: Trends and challenges. J Clean Prod. 2018;187:131–147.

17. Pokorna D, Zabranska J. Sulfur-oxidizing bacteria in environmental technology. Biotechnol Adv. 2015;33:1246–1259.

18. Ho KL, Lin WC, Chung YC, Chen YP, Tseng CP. Elimination of high concentration hydrogen sulfide and biogas purification by chemical–biological process. Chemosphere. 2013;92:1396–1401.

19. Lin WC, Chen YP, Tseng CP. Pilot-scale chemical–biological system for efficient H2S removal from biogas. Bioresour Technol. 2013;135:283–291.

20. Jędrczak A. Biological treatment of waste [In Polish]. Warszawa: PWN; 2007.

21. Sisani E, Cinti G, Discepoli G, Penchini D, Desideri U, Marmottini F. Adsorptive removal of H2S in biogas conditions for high temperature fuel cell systems. Int J Hydrog Energ. 2014;39:21753–21766.

22. Petersson A, Wellinger A. Biogas upgrading technologies—developments and innovations. 2009;

23. Kobayashi T, Li YY, Kubota K, Harada H, Maeda T, Yu HQ. Characterization of sulfide-oxidizing microbial mats developed inside a full-scale anaerobic digester employing biological desulfurization. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;93:847–857.
crossref pdf

24. Ramos I, Díaz I, Fdz-Polanco M. The role of the headspace in hydrogen sulfide removal during microaerobic digestion of sludge. Water Sci Technol. 2012;66:2258–2264.
crossref pdf

25. van der Zee FP, Villaverde S, García P, Fdz-Polanco F. Sulfide removal by moderate oxygenation of anaerobic sludge environments. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:518–524.

26. Weiland P. Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;85:849–860.
crossref pdf

27. Cosoli P, Ferrone M, Pricl S, Fermeglia M. Hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas by zeolite adsorption. Part I. GCMC molecular simulations. Chem Eng J. 2008;145:86–92.

28. Hao X, Hou G, Zheng P, Liu R, Liu C. H2S in-situ removal from biogas using a tubular zeolite/TiO2 photocatalytic reactor and the improvement on methane production. Chem Eng J. 2016;294:105–110.

29. Sahota S, Vijay VK, Subbarao PMV, et al. Characterization of leaf waste based biochar for cost effective hydrogen sulphide removal from biogas. Bioresour Technol. 2018;250:635–641.

30. Shang G, Shen G, Liu L, Chen Q, Xu Z. Kinetics and mechanisms of hydrogen sulfide adsorption by biochars. Bioresour Technol. 2013;133:495–499.

31. Kanjanarong J, Giri BS, Jaisi DP, et al. Removal of hydrogen sulfide generated during anaerobic treatment of sulfate-laden wastewater using biochar: Evaluation of efficiency and mechanisms. Bioresour Technol. 2017;234:115–121.

32. Feng Y, Li Y, Wang J, Wu M, Fan H, Mi J. Insights to the microwave effect in the preparation of sorbent for H2S removal: Desulfurization kinetics and characterization. Fuel. 2017;203:233–243.

33. Cimino S, Lisi L, de Falco G, Montagnaro F, Balsamo M, Erto A. Highlighting the effect of the support during H2S adsorption at low temperature over composite Zn-Cu sorbents. Fuel. 2018;221:374–379.

34. Li H, Su S, Hu S, et al. Effect of preparation conditions on MnxOy/Al2O3 sorbent for H2S removal from high-temperature synthesis gas. Fuel. 2018;223:115–124.

35. Thanakunpaisit N, Jantarachat N, Onthong U. Removal of hydrogen sulfide from biogas using laterite materials as an adsorbent. Energy Procedia. 2017;138:1134–1139.

36. Ros A, Lillo-Ródenas MA, Fuente E, Montes-Morán MA, Martín MJ, Linares-Solano A. High surface area materials prepared from sewage sludge-based precursors. Chemosphere. 2006;65:132–140.

37. Mohamad Nor N, Lau LC, Lee KT, Mohamed AR. Synthesis of activated carbon from lignocellulosic biomass and its applications in air pollution control - A review. J Environ Chem Eng. 2013;1:658–666.

38. Dias JM, Alvim-Ferraz MCM, Almeida MF, Rivera-Utrilla J, Sánchez-Polo M. Waste materials for activated carbon preparation and its use in aqueous-phase treatment: A review. J Environ Manage. 2007;85:833–846.

39. Xu G, Yang X, Spinosa L. Development of sludge-based adsorbents: Preparation, characterization, utilization and its feasibility assessment. J Environ Manage. 2015;151:221–232.

40. Dong Y, Ren X, Wang M, He Q, Chang L, Bao W. Effect of impregnation methods on sorbents made from lignite for desulfurization at middle temperature. J Energ Chem. 2013;22:783–789.

41. Jang D, Park SJ. Influence of nickel oxide on carbon dioxide adsorption behaviors of activated carbons. Fuel. 2012;102:439–444.

42. Zhang J, Wang G, Wang W, Song H, Wang L. Preparation of manganese dioxide loaded activated carbon adsorbents and their desulfurization performance. Russ J Phys Chem A. 2016;90:2633–2641.
crossref pdf

43. Cadena F, Peters RW. Evaluation of chemical oxidizers for hydrogen sulfide control. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1988;60:1259–1263.

44. Laszakovits JR, MacKay AA. Removal of cyanotoxins by potassium permanganate: Incorporating competition from natural water constituents. Water Res. 2019;155:86–95.

45. Jeong B, Oh MS, Park HM, et al. Elimination of microcystin-LR and residual Mn species using permanganate and powdered activated carbon: Oxidation products and pathways. Water Res. 2017;114:189–199.

46. Bunyakan C, Chungsiriporn J, Saelee R, Arunraj P. A comparative study on biogas cleaning by varius oxidants. In : 4th International Conference on Engineering Technologies - ICET 2009; Novi Sad.

47. Twumasi AE, Norberg P, Sjöström C, Forslund M. Textural and hydrogen sulphide adsorption behaviour of double metal-silica modified with potassium permanganate. J Porous Mater. 2013;20:447–455.
crossref pdf

48. Long JW, Wallace JM, Peterson GW, Huynh K. Manganese oxide nanoarchitectures as broad-spectrum sorbents for toxic gases. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2016;8:1184–1193.

49. Zhang J, Wang G, Wang W, Song H, Li F. Effect of calcination temperature on desulfurization performance over MnxOy supported on MCM-41 at low temperatures. Res Chem Intermed. 2016;42:6003–6012.
crossref pdf

50. Shin HG, Kim H, Noh T, Kim D, Kim YN. Degradation behavior of high surface area calcium hydroxide sorbent for SO2 removal. Int J Miner Process. 2011;98:145–149.

51. Zhang J, Wang L, Song H, Song H. Adsorption of low-concentration H2S on manganese dioxide-loaded activated carbon. Res Chem Intermed. 2015;41:6087–6104.
crossref pdf

52. Patel BR, Vella PA. Emerging Technologies in Hazardous Waste Management V. Washington: American Chemical Society; 1995.

53. Qin L, Han J, Chen W, Liu Z, He M, Xing F. Enhancing SO2 removal efficiency by lime modified with sewage sludge in a novel integrated desulfurization process. Environ Prot Eng. 2017;43:17–27.

54. Kumar A, Jana SK. Absorption of SO2 in a three-phase bubble column and foam-bed slurry reactor. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol. 2017;4:328–332.

55. Hwidi RS, Tengku Izhar TN, Mohd Saad FN, Adam T. Hydrogen sulphide emissions reduction using hydrated lime. Mater Sci Eng. 2018;429:1–8.

56. Wang J, Guo J, Parnas R, Liang B. Calcium-based regenerable sorbents for high temperature H2S removal. Fuel. 2015;154:17–23.

57. Pisani R, De Moraes D. Removal of sulfur dioxide from a continuously operated binary fluidized bed reactor using inert solids and hydrated lime. J Hazard Mater. 2004;109:183–189.

Fig. 1
Appearance of catalytic bed from water treatment plant used during experiments.
Fig. 2
Hydrogen-sulphide removal-efficiency from raw biogas depending on variable air concentrations in testes biogas streams.
Fig. 3
Precipitated sulphur visible on the bottom surface of the bed.
Table 1
Chemical Composition of Catalytic Bed Used during Full Scale Experiments
Element Unit Mn O Si C Ca Mg S Fe
Content % 47.31 38.08 0.38 2.87 4.86 0.27 0.37 5.67
Table 2
Basic Information about H2S Removal Process
Basic information Bed area [m2] Bed height [m] Bulk density [kg/m3] Flow rate of biogas [m3/s] Volumetric flow rate of biogas [m3/m2·s]

3 1.6 470 0.21 0.07
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Web of Science
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers.        Developed in M2PI
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers