| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us
Environ Eng Res > Volume 22(3); 2017 > Article
Sun and Sun: Prediction of carbon dioxide emissions based on principal component analysis with regularized extreme learning machine: The case of China

Abstract

Nowadays, with the burgeoning development of economy, CO2 emissions increase rapidly in China. It has become a common concern to seek effective methods to forecast CO2 emissions and put forward the targeted reduction measures. This paper proposes a novel hybrid model combined principal component analysis (PCA) with regularized extreme learning machine (RELM) to make CO2 emissions prediction based on the data from 1978 to 2014 in China. First eleven variables are selected on the basis of Pearson coefficient test. Partial autocorrelation function (PACF) is utilized to determine the lag phases of historical CO2 emissions so as to improve the rationality of input selection. Then PCA is employed to reduce the dimensionality of the influential factors. Finally RELM is applied to forecast CO2 emissions. According to the modeling results, the proposed model outperforms a single RELM model, extreme learning machine (ELM), back propagation neural network (BPNN), GM(1,1) and Logistic model in terms of errors. Moreover, it can be clearly seen that ELM-based approaches save more computing time than BPNN. Therefore the developed model is a promising technique in terms of forecasting accuracy and computing efficiency for CO2 emission prediction.

1. Introduction

After over 30 y of the economic reforms in China, there emerges a remarkable rise with average annual GDP growth rate at nearly 10% [1]. However, the burgeoning development of economy inevitably results in the large increase in energy consumption and hence CO2 emissions. China overtook the United States as the world’s leading emitter of CO2 in the year of 2006 [2]. To respond to the cause of serious global warming, China commits to continue taking effective measures for CO2 emission control during the 13th Five-Year Plan, thus the carbon emission peaking can be reached by 2030. Accordingly, it’s of great significance to focus on CO2 emissions prediction research, which provides a valuable reference for practical measures of CO2 emission reduction.
A report published by the National Petroleum Council in the United States predicted a 50% – 60% growth in total global demand for energy by 2030 [3]. Energy consumption is the main source of CO2 emissions [4], thus a lot of researchers have paid attention to this area. Say and Yucel [5] studied the relationship between total energy consumption and total CO2 emissions through regression analysis, which displayed a strong relationship between these two factors. In [6], the energy consumptions were modeled using artificial neural network (ANN) based on economic and demographic variables. The results showed that the correlation coefficients between ANN predictions and actual energy consumptions were higher than 90%, which indicated a high reliability of ANN for forecasting future energy consumption. Azadeh and Tarverdian [7] presented an integrated algorithm based on genetic algorithm, computer simulation and design of experiments using stochastic procedures for monthly electrical energy consumption prediction. In [8], Utgikar and Scott explored the possible causes of inaccuracy in energy forecasting which could provide a better understanding of prediction process and design a strategy for reducing the errors in energy prediction. Aydin [9] utilized multiple linear regression analysis to study the relationship between CO2 emissions and energy-related factors where correlation analysis were employed to determine the influential factors. In [10], an approach was proposed for coal-related CO2 projections in future planning, wherein coal-related CO2 emissions were modeled by trend analysis. Feng and Zhang [11] conducted a case study to predict the effects of different development alternatives on future energy consumption and carbon emission, namely under three scenarios: business-as usual, basic-policy and low-carbon. The results provided insights into the energy future and highlighted possible steps to develop a sustainable low-carbon city.
At this stage, researches on carbon emissions can be mainly divided into two parts: discussion on influential factors and study on prediction models. For the influential factors, existing studies related to this part include the methods such as index decomposition means [1213] and input-output structural analysis [1415]. Andres and Rustemoglu [16] introduced refined laspeyres index method into the research of relationships between CO2 emissions and four identified factors in Brazil and Russia for the period 1992–2011 to explore the determinants of accelerating CO2 emissions. Li et al. [17] applied logarithmic mean divisia index method (LMDI) to decompose the change in carbon emissions into some influencing factors caused by urbanization. The results revealed that energy intensity contributed largely to carbon emission reduction in Hubei Province. Li et al. [18] estimated the agricultural CO2 emissions in China during the period of 1994 to 2011 and applied LMDI as the decomposition technique. The results illustrated that agricultural subsidy acts to reduce CO2 emissions effectively and has increased in recent years. Wang et al. [19] proved that economic development, energy structure and low energy efficiency are three main driving factors of increasing CO2 emissions in China based on a modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis approach. Ahmed [20] studied the relationship between CO2 emissions, economic growth, urbanization and trade openness by two steps: (a) Autoregressive distributed lag bounds test was carried out to explore whether there existed co-integration between the variables. (b) The relationship between the factors was analyzed according to the long-run and short-run dynamics. Based on the last research, Ali et al. [21] added the factor of energy consumption to examine its dynamic impact on CO2 emissions. Deng et al. [22] combined structural decomposition analysis and logarithmic mean divisia index method to study the drivers behind CO2 emissions in Yunnan province. This technique could take both production and final demand into account in less-developed regions. Cointegration and Granger causality were adopted by Tang and Tan [23] to examine the relationship among CO2 emissions, energy consumption, foreign direct investment and economic growth in Vietnam. They pointed out that there existed long-run equilibrium among these variables. Lin et al. [24] evaluated the relation between CO2 emissions and industrial growth through an autoregressive distributed lag bounds testing and cointegration analysis. The results suggested that there was a reduction potential of CO2 emissions in the Chinese manufacturing sector without intimidating industrial growth. Wang et al. [25] applied a two-level decomposition model based on Kaya identity to uncover the main influential factor for CO2 emissions. The results indicated that energy intensity reduction was conducive to low-carbon economic development. Based on combining correlation analysis, gray correlation analysis and principal component regression analysis, Bian et al. [26] integrated data envelopment analysis with energy structure adjustment to measure CO2 emission reduction in China. The findings showed that it was a practical way to decrease CO2 emissions through the abatement of coal consumption and development of non-fossil energy.
For the forecasting techniques, CO2 emissions are predicted mainly through the relationship models between carbon emission and its influencing factors based on different scenarios. Kang et al. [27] employed STIPRAT model to examine the impact of energy-related factors on CO2 emissions and tested the spillover effects of per capita CO2 emissions through a spatial panel data technique. This study provided some policy advice on reduction of China’s CO2 emissions. Based on STIPRAT model, Sheng and Guo [28] extended this basic method to be a panel error-correction one which can dynamically take the influence of urbanization changes on total CO2 emissions into consideration. Their findings indicated that the rapid urbanization augmented CO2 emissions both in the short-run and long-run. Wu et al. [29] utilized a multi-variable grey model to forecast CO2 emissions on the basis of energy consumption, urban population and economic growth. Pérez-Suárez et al. [30] compared environmental kuznets curve with logistic growth model in CO2 emission prediction considering a sample of 175 countries. The results showed that extended environmental kuznets curve tended to outperform the forecasting accuracy of the latter one. Vector autoregressive model was adopted by Xu and Lin [31] to identify the drivers of CO2 emissions in China’s iron and steel industry. The findings revealed that energy efficiency played a significant part in CO2 emission reduction. Baareh [32] introduced four input data including oil, natural gas, coal and primary energy consumption to build ANN for CO2 emission prediction. The results proved ANN was a powerful and efficient tool in forecasting CO2 emissions. A hybrid model that combined ANN with bees algorithm for analyzing CO2 emissions in the world was presented by Behrang et al. [33]. Two steps were carried out: (a) The bees algorithm was applied to determine the indicators. (b) World CO2 emissions were forecasted up to the year of 2040 based on ANN.
With the propositions and prosperities of artificial intelligent algorithms, traditional neural networks offer a new way of CO2 emission prediction. Despite their strong nonlinear mapping ability and parallel processing capability, the drawbacks of these methods are the slow learning speed, complex training parameters and easily tapping into the local minimum. Huang et al. [34] introduced extreme learning machine (ELM) to solve the stated issue of conventional training methods. With the advantages such as fast convergence speed, high training accuracy and no manual tuning, the ELM model has been successfully applied to forecasting problems in many fields, such as wind speed [35], electricity load [36], oil price [37] and so on. However, ELM is based on empirical risk minimization principle which easily causes over-fitting phenomenon. Therefore, in order to guarantee the global optimization and generalization ability, regularized extreme learning machine (RELM) model, in which the calculation process of Moore-Penrose generalized inverse and the introduction of the regularization factor are added to ELM, is used for CO2 emission prediction in this paper.
In general, based on the aforementioned studies, it can be found that the appropriate selection of influential factors has momentous influence on the prediction results of CO2 emissions. However, most studies only put emphasis on the impact of these factors on the total CO2 emissions and ignore the correlation to each other. In reality, there exist overlaps of information contained in the data, thus, the computational efficiency is greatly depressed due to the complex network. Therefore, principal component analysis (PCA) is employed in this paper to reduce the dimension of pre-select influential factors with retention of information to the utmost so that the network structure can be simplified and operation efficiency and prediction accuracy can be significantly improved.
Therefore, compared with past works, there exist two main differences: (i) RELM, a new kind of neural networks, is firstly introduced into CO2 emission prediction, which overcomes the disadvantages of slow learning speed, the need of numerous training samples, over-fitting and so on in the previous researches. (ii) The correlations among influential factors are paid close attention in this paper, thus PCA is utilized to manipulate them for dimension reduction to improve the computational efficiency and forecasting precision. The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents a brief description of PCA, ELM and RELM; Section 3 displays the framework of the proposed novel approach in this study; Section 4 elaborates the selection of input; Section 5 validates the established model through a case study; Finally, the paper is concluded and several concrete mitigation measures have been further put forward in Section 6.

2. Methodology

2.1. Principal Component Analysis

PCA was initially introduced in the discussion of non-random variables by Pearson [38] and extended to random one by Hotelling [39]. This method can effectively reduce the dimensionality of a data set on the premise of retaining main variance. It is achieved by applying orthogonal transformation to convert the data into a new set of indexes, also called PCs, that meet: (i) Each PC is a linear combination of original variables. (ii) PCs are uncorrelated to each other. The first PC accounts for the most information of original index and the largest proportion of variability which its predecessors have not explained is interpreted by each subsequent one. In this paper, the PCA calculation was performed on SPSS v.19.0 and the accumulative explained variation of the selected PCs should be more than 0.85.

2.2. Extreme Learning Machine

The ELM is a novel machine learning algorithm for single layer feed-forward neural networks. The main nature of ELM is the random initialization of the input weights and hidden biases without iterative adjustments during the learning process, thus the optimal output weights can be quickly obtained based on the predefined network structure [40]. Besides its fast learning speed, ELM also avoids numerous problems such as local minima and learning rate faced by other ANNs [41]. The topological structure of ELM network is illustrated in Fig. 1. The specific procedures of ELM are described as follows:
Given a training data set with N samples {(xi, yi )}i=1N, the ELM model with L hidden nodes are expressed as
(1)
i=1Lβig(wi·xj+bi)=yj,         j=1,2,N
where xj is the input pattern, yj is the desired output, wiR is the randomly assigned input weight vector between the ith hidden node and input nodes. bi is the randomly selected bias of the ith hidden node. g(·) is an activation function. βi represents the weight connecting the ith hidden node and output nodes.
The Eq. (1) can be simply written as:
(2)
Hβ=y
where
(3)
H(w1,,wL,x1,,xN,b1,,bL)=[g(w1·x1+b1)g(wL·x1+bL)g(w1·xN+b1)g(wL·xN+bL)]N×L
(4)
{β=[β1T,,βLT]y=[y1T,,yNT]
The output weights can be derived by finding the least square solutions to the linear Eq. (5):
(5)
Hβ-y=HH+y-y=minβHβ-y
Here the least square solutions are obtained as follows:
(6)
β=H+y
where H+ represents the Moore-Penrose generalized inverse matrix of hidden layer output matrix H.

2.3. Regularized Extreme Learning Machine

The drawback of standard ELM algorithm is the single consideration of empirical error minimization which gives rise to overfitting and depresses the generalization ability [42]. To solve this problem, both empirical error minimization and structural risk minimization are simultaneously taken into account to achieve the best tradeoff with a regularization parameter C in RELM model [43]. The formula can be described as follows:
(7)
minβCy-Hβ22+β22
Eq. (7) can be also expressed as the following optimization problem with a constraint condition:
(8)
minβCe22+β22
(9)
s.t.y-Hβ=e
where e =[e1, e2,...,eN]T is the output error of the training sample xi.
According to Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) condition, the corresponding Lagrange function is given by:
(10)
L(β,e,λ)=Ce22+β22+λT(y-Hβ-e)
where the nonnegative λ is the Lagrangian multiplier. The relevant optimization conditions are shown as follows:
(11)
{Lβ=02β-HTλ=0Le=02Ce-λ=0Lλ=0y-Hβ-e=0
For N is the number of training samples, L is the number of hidden nodes, the final output weight matrix β can be derived as follows:
(12)
β={(HTH+IC)-1HTyN>LHT(HTH+IC)-1yN<L

3. Approaches of PC-RELM Model

The framework of the proposed model for carbon dioxide emission prediction is displayed in Fig. 2. This novel approach can be explained in detail as follows:
In part I, the Pearson coefficient analysis and bilateral significance test are carried out to study the relationships between the impact factors and carbon dioxide emissions. The partial autocorrelation analysis is adopted to select historical carbon dioxide emissions with highest correlation on the target emission. This section contributes to the pre-selection of input for research. In part II, PCA is employed for feature extraction and dimension reduction of the pre-selected data, which can improve the computational efficiency. Part III aims at realizing carbon dioxide emission prediction through RELM model.

4. Input Selection

4.1. Data Source and Conversion

The research is made based on energy consumption as well as other related data in China from the year of 1978 to 2014. The consumption of total energy and percentage composition of four kinds of energies that contain raw coal, crude oil, natural gas and primary electricity are recorded in China Statistical Yearbook on the basis of standard coal. Considering there is no direct promulgation of CO2 emissions, conversion coefficients listed in Table 1 are employed to convert the standard coal data to corresponding values of CO2 emissions, according to the comprehensive report of “China sustainable development of energy and carbon emission scenarios analysis” [44]. The yearly CO2 emissions in China during the period 1978–2014 are shown in Table 2.
In Fig. 3, it can be clearly found out that there exists a continuous rise in CO2 emissions of the total one, which displays the same trend with raw coal. This is due to the fact that coal is the main fuel in China which accounts for nearly 65% in primary energy consumption structure. However, crude oil and natural gas contribute a relatively small proportion of CO2 emissions. Fig. 4 displays the growth multiple of CO2 emissions of different energies from 1979 to 2014 with the data in 1978 as the base. The trend can be divided into two stages: there was a gentle rise with slow growth rate before the year of 2002. After this turning point, the growth rate increased rapidly and the growth multiple reached about 6.8 in 2014. Moreover, in response to the national call for energy conservation and emission reduction nowadays, the utilization of natural gas is vigorously promoted. This is the main reason why natural gas presents a significant increase in CO2 emissions in recent years.

4.2. SPSS Analysis

In the previous studies on carbon dioxide emission forecasting, influential factors mainly contain energy consumption, GDP, population, urbanization rate, service industry and so on [4548]. In this paper, eleven variables are pre-selected from China Statistical Yearbook for CO2 emissions prediction including coal consumption, GDP of primary industry, GDP of secondary industry, GDP of tertiary industry, population, urbanization level, transportation possession quantity, power generation, steel production, total investment in fixed assets of the whole society and area final consumption.
Mining the relationships between CO2 emissions and the eleven pre-selected variables are essential for the establishment of a good prediction model. Pearson coefficient and bilateral significance test are selected for correlation analysis in this paper. Table 3 presents the values of correlation coefficients. It can be found that all the correlation coefficients are more than 0.8 and the concomitant probability value of bilateral significance test is 0.000 less than 0.05, which reveals that there exists positive and significant correlation between CO2 emissions and the eleven above-mentioned indicators. Thus, the eleven pre-selected variables all should be taken into account in the CO2 emission prediction.

4.3. PACF Analysis

The influence of historical CO2 emissions on the target one is taken into consideration in this part. PACF is employed to find out the inherent relationship of the dataset. The partial autocorrelograms is illustrated in Fig. 5, where the confidence level is 90%. The results indicated that carbon emssion data in lag 1 and lag 2 showed a strong correlation, thus these two variables are also selected as influential factors.

4.4. PCA Process

Based on the pre-selected thirteen variables in the section of 4.1 and 4.2, PCA is utilized to remove the multicollinearity presented in the predictors. We mine the major information containing in the data through this method. The PCA process result is shown in Table 4 and Fig. 6. It can be seen that the first principal component explain more than 95% of the factors, so this principal component is utilized to replace the predictors as the input.

5. Experiment of CO2 Emission Prediction in China Based on RELM Model

5.1. Comparative Framework

The experiment of CO2 emission prediction in China is carried out based on the aforementioned related data from 1978 to 2014, totally 37 data points. Wherein, the data from 1980 to 2009 are selected as training set and the remaining 5 data are utilized as test set.
As shown in Fig. 7, three comparative parts are contained in the framework. In part I, four basic models including ELM, BPNN, GM(1,1) and Logistic model are introduced to forecast CO2 emissions. Part II utilizes RELM to test whether the regularization parameter donates to the prediction accuracy and the effectiveness of PCA is explored in Part III.

5.2. Evaluation Criteria of Model Performance

In order to determine which forecasting model outperforms the other models, the performance of the prediction models is usually assessed by statistical criteria: relative error (RE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), maximum absolute percentage error (MaxAPE), median absolute percentage error (MdAPE) and root mean square error (RMSE). The smaller the values are, the better the forecasting performance is. These five error indexes are defined as follows:
(13)
RE=|yt-yt*yt|×100%
(14)
MAPE=1Nt=1N|yt-yt*yt|×100%
(15)
MaxAPE=max(|yt-yt*yt|×100%)
(16)
MdAPE=median(|yt-yt*yt|×100%)
(17)
RMSE=1Nt=1N(yt-yt*)2
where yt and yt* are the actual and forecast CO2 emissions at time period t, respectively. N represents the number of CO2 emissions to be predicted.

5.3. Parameter Setting

As above mentioned, only two parameters need to be pre-set in RELM model. The regularization parameter C and the number of node in hidden layer are set as 210 and 100, respectively. As compared models, the selection of parameters in ELM and BPNN is listed in Table 5.

5.4. Results and Discussion

In Fig. 8, CO2 emission prediction curves from 2010 to 2014 are obtained by six different models. It can be obviously found out that: (a) in contrast with other five models, the goodness of fit between the forecasted value by PC-RELM and actual value reaches the highest degree; (b) the fitting condition of ELM-based models is generally better than other techniques mainly due to the strong generalization ability; (c) the hybrid model PC-RELM presents higher predicted precision than RELM which indicates that the PCA part can effectively improve the prediction performance of the single RELM.
Fig. 9 displays the relative errors achieved by the six prediction models. The relative errors obtained by PC-RELM are all under 0.5% which outperforms other methods except in the year of 2011. The single RELM model exhibits a slightly lower error in the second point than PCA-RELM. In addition, there emerges large deviation between the actual values and predicted ones in BPNN and GM(1,1) model where the maximum relative errors are both over 9%.
The statistical errors of the six forecasting techniques are clearly shown in Table 6. The analysis manifests that: (a) PC-RELM model provides the best prediction results in terms of MAPE, MaxAPE, MdAPE and RMSE. (b) Compared with RELM model, the PCA part in PC-RELM removes the multicollinearity in pre-selected influential factors and simplifies the network structure which contributes to the operation efficiency and the improvement of forecasting performance. (c) The errors of RELM is lower than ELM mainly due to the fact that the introduction of the regularization parameter in RELM enhances the global optimization and generalization ability of ELM model in CO2 emission prediction. (d) Considering the significant influence of representative samples on BPNN, the MAPE, MaxAPE, MdAPE and RMSE values are higher than ELM-based algorithms. (e) The errors obtained by GM(1,1) are largest among the six models mainly because the smoothness degree of the original data has an impact on the prediction accuracy. (f) The prediction precision of Logistic model is higher than BPNN and GM(1,1) while it is remarkably lower than ELM-based models. The MAPE value of Logistic model is 18.5 times larger than PC-RELM.
The computing time of PC-RELM, RELM, ELM and BPNN for continuously running for 100 times in MATLAB 2014a on a Windows 7 system is shown in Table 7. It can be clearly seen that ELM-based models save more computing time than BPNN model mainly because there is no need to update the randomly selected parameters in the learning process. In contrast with ELM, RELM takes 2.44 s for computing, which is slightly longer than ELM. Therefore, the regularization part has little impact on the running speed of ELM while improving the forecasting accuracy. Notably, PC-RELM is 0.3 s shorter than RELM, thus the PCA part can upgrade the running speed to some degree with the improvement of prediction precision.

6. Conclusions

This paper chooses eleven influential factors including the lag phases of historical CO2 emissions. After reducing the dimensionality of the influential factors through PCA process, RELM is introduced to forecast the CO2 emissions. Several conclusions can be obtained as follows: (a) the PCA process is conducive to improving the operation speed and forecasting accuracy; (b) the high prediction precision of RELM model is attributed to the introduction of regularization part which enhances the global optimization and generalization ability with little time cost. (c) RELM combined with PCA outperforms other models with the lowest MAPE, MaxAPE, MdAPE and RMSE, indicating that PC-RELM model is a promising technique for CO2 emission prediction.
Based on the findings in this paper, some suggestions for CO2 emission reduction have been proposed with the consideration of selected influential factors: (a) According to the correlation analysis, coal consumption is completely correlated with CO2 emission, thus it’s necessary to substitute fossil energy with renewable and clean energy so as to achieve the diversification of energy consumption. (b) The economic growth should rely on innovative talents and technological advancements to improve resource allocation efficiency. The proportion of primary, secondary and tertiary industry ought to be reasonably adjusted thereby reducing energy consumption of GDP per capita. (c) People should enhance their low carbon awareness and cut down energy consumption during their life and labor. (d) To control vehicle exhaust emissions, traffic restrictions based on even-numbered and odd-numbered license plates can be implemented to reduce pollutant emissions and traffic pressure.

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to Ye Minquan for data collection for the research.

References

1. Jiang X, Zhu K, Wang SThe potential for reducing China’s carbon dioxide emissions: Role of foreign-invested enterprises. Global Environ Chang. 2015;35:22–30.
crossref

2. Gurney KRGlobal change: China at the carbon crossroads. Nature. 2009;458:977–979.
crossref pmid

3. Holditch SA, Chianelli RRFactors that will influence oil and gas supply and demand in the 21st century. MRS Bull. 2008;33:317–323.
crossref

4. Longwell HJThe future of the oil and gas industry: Past approaches, new challenges. World Energ. 1998;5:100–104.


5. Say NP, Yücel MEnergy consumption and CO2 emissions in Turkey: Empirical analysis and future projection based on an economic growth. Energ Policy. 2006;34:3870–3876.
crossref

6. Aydin G, Jang H, Topal EEnergy consumption modeling using artificial neural networks: The case of the world’s highest consumers. Energ Source Part B. 2016;11:212–219.
crossref

7. Azadeh A, Tarverdian SIntegration of genetic algorithm, computer simulation and design of experiments for forecasting electrical energy consumption. Energ Policy. 2007;35:5229–5241.
crossref

8. Utgikar PV, Scott PJEnergy forecasting: Predictions, reality and analysis of cause of error. Energ Policy. 2006;34:3087–3092.
crossref

9. Aydin GThe development and validation of regression models to predict energy-related CO2 emissions in Turkey. Energ Source Part B. 2016;10:176–182.
crossref

10. Aydin GThe modeling of coal-related CO2 emissions and projections into future planning. Energ Source Part A. 2014;36:191–201.
crossref

11. Feng YY, Zhang LXScenario analysis of urban energy saving and carbon abatement policies: A case study of Beijing city, China. Procedia Environ Sci. 2012;13:632–644.
crossref

12. Lin BQ, Moubarak MDecomposition analysis: Change of carbon dioxide emissions in the Chinese textile industry. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2013;26:389–396.
crossref

13. González PF, Landajo M, Presno MJThe driving forces behind changes in CO2 emission levels in EU-27. Differences between member states. Environ Sci Policy. 2013;38:11–16.
crossref

14. Zhang Y, Wang HK, Liang S, et alTemporal and spatial variations in consumption-based carbon dioxide emissions in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2014;40:60–68.
crossref

15. Wang YF, Zhao HY, Li LY, et alCarbon dioxide emission drivers for a typical metropolis using input–output structural decomposition analysis. Energ Policy. 2013;58:312–318.
crossref

16. Andres AR, Rustemoglu HDeterminants of CO2 emissions in Brazil and Russia between 1992 and 2011: A decomposition analysis. Environ Sci Policy. 2016;58:95–106.
crossref

17. Li Q, Wei YN, Dong YFCoupling analysis of China’s urbanization and carbon emissions: example from Hubei Province. Nat Hazards. 2016;81:1333–1348.
crossref pdf

18. Li W, Ou Q, Chen YDecomposition of China’s CO2 emissions from agriculture utilizing an improved Kaya identity. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21:13000–13006.
crossref

19. Wang QW, Chiu YH, Chiu CRDriving factors behind carbon dioxide emissions in China: A modified production-theoretical decomposition analysis. Energ Econ. 2015;51:252–260.
crossref

20. Ahmed KThe sheer scale of China’s urban renewal and CO2 emissions: multiple structural breaks, long-run relationship, and short-run dynamics. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:16115–16126.
crossref pdf

21. Ali HS, Law SH, Zannah TIDynamic impact of urbanization, economic growth, energy consumption, and trade openness on CO2 emissions in Nigeria. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2016;23:12435–12443.
crossref pdf

22. Deng MX, Li W, Hu YDecomposing industrial energy-related CO2 emissions in Yunnan Province, China: Switching to low-carbon economic growth. Energies. 2016;9:23
crossref

23. Tang CF, Tan BWThe impact of energy consumption, income and foreign direct investment on carbon dioxide emissions in Vietnam. Energy. 2015;79:447–454.
crossref

24. Lin BQ, Moubarak M, Ouyang XLCarbon dioxide emissions and growth of the manufacturing sector: Evidence for China. Energy. 2014;76:830–837.
crossref

25. Wang CJ, Wang F, Zhang HG, et alCarbon emissions decomposition and environmental mitigation policy recommendations for sustainable development in Shandong Province. Sustainability. 2014;6:8164–8179.
crossref

26. Bian YW, He P, Xu HEstimation of potential energy saving and carbon dioxide emission reduction in China based on an extended non-radial DEA approach. Energ Policy. 2013;63:962–971.
crossref

27. Kang YQ, Zhao T, Wu PImpacts of energy-related CO2 emissions in China: A spatial panel data technique. Nat Hazards. 2016;81:405–421.
crossref pdf

28. Sheng PF, Guo XHThe long-run and short-run impacts of urbanization on carbon dioxide emissions. Econ Model. 2016;53:208–215.
crossref

29. Wu LF, Liu SF, Liu DL, et alModelling and forecasting CO2 emissions in the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa) countries using a novel multi-variable grey model. Energy. 2015;79:489–495.
crossref

30. Pérez-Suárez R, López-Menéndez AJGrowing green? Forecasting CO2 emissions with environmental Kuznets curves and logistic growth models. Environ Sci Policy. 2015;54:428–437.
crossref

31. Xu B, Lin BQAssessing CO2 emissions in China’s iron and steel industry: A dynamic vector autoregression model. Appl Energ. 2016;161:375–386.
crossref

32. Baareh AKSolving the carbon dioxide emission estimation problem: An artificial neural network model. J Softw Eng Appl. 2013;6:338–342.
crossref

33. Behrang MA, Assareh E, Assari MR, et alUsing bees algorithm and artificial neural network to forecast world carbon dioxide emission. Energ Source. 2011;33:1747–1759.
crossref

34. Huang GB, Zhu QY, Siew CKExtreme learning machine: Theory and applications. Neurocomputing. 2006;70:489–501.
crossref

35. Liu H, Tian HQ, Li YFFour wind speed multi-step forecasting models using extreme learning machines and signal decomposing algorithms. Energ Convers Manage. 2015;100:16–22.
crossref

36. Ömer FEForecasting electricity load by a novel recurrent extreme learning machines approach. Int J Elec Power. 2016;78:429–435.
crossref

37. Yu L, Dai W, Tang LA novel decomposition ensemble model with extended extreme learning machine for crude oil price forecasting. Eng Appl Artif Intel. 2015;47:110–121.
crossref

38. Pearson KOn lines and planes of closest fit to systems of points in space. Philos Mag. 1901;2:559–572.
crossref

39. Hotelling HAnalysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. J Educ Psychol. 1933;24:417–441.
crossref

40. Li S, Goel L, Wang PAn ensemble approach for short-term load forecasting by extreme learning machine. Appl Energ. 2016;170:22–29.
crossref

41. Deo RC, Şahin MApplication of the extreme learning machine algorithm for the prediction of monthly Effective Drought Index in eastern Australia. Atmos Res. 2015;153:512–525.
crossref

42. Lombardi AMSome reasoning on the RELM-CSEP likelihood-based tests. Earth Planets Space. 2014;66:286–301.
crossref

43. Zhang K, Luo MXOutlier-robust extreme learning machine for regression problems. Neurocomputing. 2015;151:1519–1527.
crossref

44. Energy Research Institute National Development And Reform Commission. The comprehensive report of China sustainable development of energy and carbon emission scenarios analysis. [cited May, 2003]. Available from: http://www.docin.com/p-419481261.html


45. Asongu S, Montasser GE, Toumi HTesting the relationships between energy consumption, CO2 emissions, and economic growth in 24 African countries: A panel ARDL approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;23:6563–6573.
crossref pdf

46. Auffhammer M, Carson RTForecasting the path of China’s CO2 emissions using province-level information. J Environ Econ Manag. 2008;55:229–247.
crossref

47. Farhani S, Ozturk ICausal relationship between CO2 emissions, real GDP, energy consumption, financial development, trade openness, and urbanization in Tunisia. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2015;22:15663–15676.
crossref

48. Song JKChina’s carbon emissions prediction model based on support vector regression. J China Univ Pet. 2012;36:182–187.


Fig. 1
The ELM network.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f1.gif
Fig. 2
Framework for carbon dioxide emission prediction based on PC-RELM.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f2.gif
Fig. 3
CO2 emissions of total energies and main sources during 1978–2014 in China.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f3.gif
Fig. 4
CO2 emission growth multiple of of total energies and main sources.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f4.gif
Fig. 5
PACF of total CO2 emissions dataset.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f5.gif
Fig. 6
Scree plot in PCA analysis.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f6.gif
Fig. 7
Comparison framework for CO2 emission forecasting.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f7.gif
Fig. 8
CO2 emission forecasting results from 2010 to 2014.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f8.gif
Fig. 9
Comparison of relative errors for different forecasting models.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-22-3-302f9.gif
Table 1
CO2 Emission Conversion Coefficients for Different Energy Species
Energy species Coal Crude oil Natural gas Power
C/(t/t) 0.7467 0.5825 0.4435 0
Table 2
CO2 Emissions over the Period of 1978–2014 in China (10,000 tons)
Year Total Year Total Year Total
1978 38,534.27924 1991 70,231.63738 2004 149,752.0567
1979 39,563.73908 1992 73,756.9878 2005 171,180.9606
1980 40,591.80094 1993 77,973.55682 2006 187,499.1829
1981 42,344.55343 1994 82,210.04039 2007 203,585.7424
1982 44,734.0561 1995 87,488.97443 2008 207,193.8969
1983 47,669.68216 1996 90,002.04612 2009 217,033.0961
1984 52,387.94459 1997 89,694.06873 2010 229,304.1098
1985 51,788.19323 1998 89,684.42261 2011 248,653.6079
1986 54,686.05874 1999 92,955.14501 2012 254,071.7937
1987 58,677.9241 2000 95,437.90723 2013 261,149.6338
1988 62,947.84656 2001 99,844.06383 2014 263,144.034
1989 65,524.42751 2002 109,210.1317
1990 66,623.92291 2003 128,392.9525
Table 3
Correlation Analysis at the Bilateral Significance Level of 0.01
Factors Coefficient Significance Factors Coefficient Significance
Coal consumption 1.000 0.000 Transportation possession quantity 0.931 0.000
GDP of primary industry 0.974 0.000 Power generation 0.990 0.000
GDP of secondary industry 0.974 0.000 Steel production 0.988 0.000
GDP of tertiary industry 0.956 0.000 Total investment in fixed assets of the whole society 0.918 0.000
Population 0.866 0.000 Area final consumption 0.966 0.000
Urbanization level 0.973 0.000
Table 4
Component Matrix
Component PC1
Coal consumption 0.984
GDP of primary industry 0.996
GDP of secondary industry 0.995
GDP of tertiary industry 0.987
Population 0.845
Urbanization level 0.961
Transportation possession quantity 0.973
Power generation 0.999
Steel production 0.992
Total investment in fixed assets of the whole society 0.962
Area final consumption 0.994
Historical CO2 emissions(Lag 1) 0.995
Historical CO2 emissions(Lag 2) 0.993
Table 5
Parameters for ELM and BPNN Model
Forecasting model Parameters Value
ELM Number of node in hidden layer 100

BPNN Number of node in hidden layer 50
Maximum number of convergence 100
Learning rate 0.1
Error 0.00004
Table 6
Statistical Error Measures of Prediction Methods
Forecasting Methods Indexes

MAPE MaxAPE MdAPE RMSE
PC-RELM 0.252% 0.378% 0.330% 0.003
RELM 1.704% 3.681% 1.690% 0.021
ELM 2.239% 4.651% 2.223% 0.026
BPNN 5.498% 9.164% 5.097% 0.059
GM(1,1) 5.774% 9.517% 5.123% 0.066
Logistic Model 4.683% 7.270% 4.377% 0.053
Table 7
Computing Time of PC-RELM, RELM, ELM and BPNN Models
PC-RELM RELM ELM BPNN
t(s) (100 times) 2.14 2.44 1.52 65.87
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
TEL : +82-2-383-9697   FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. All rights reserved.                Powerd by M2community
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers