| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us
Environ Eng Res > Volume 22(2); 2017 > Article
Tiwari, Jamsheera, Zirlianngura, and Lee: Use of hybrid materials in the trace determination of As(V) from aqueous solutions: An electrochemical study


The carbon paste electrode (CPE) was modified with the pristine bentonite and hybrid material (HDTMA-modified bentonite). The modified-CPEs are then employed as working electrode in an electrochemical detection of As(V) from aqueous solutions using the cyclic voltammetric measurements. Cyclic voltammograms revealed that As(V) showed reversible behavior onto the working electrode. The hybrid material-modified carbon paste electrode showed significantly enhanced electrochemical signal which was then utilized in the low level detection of As(V). Moreover, the studies were conducted at neutral pH conditions. The electrochemical studies were conducted with scan rates (20 to 200 mV/s) to deduce the mechanism of redox processes involved at the electrode surface. The anodic current was linearly increased, increasing the concentration of As(V) from 5.0 to 35.0 μg/g using the hybrid material-modified electrode. This provided fairly a good calibration line for As(V) detection. The presence of varied concentrations of As(III) in the determination of total arsenic was studied. The influence of several cations and anions viz., Cu(II), Mn(II), Zn(II), Pb(II), Cd(II), Fe(III), Cl, NO3, PO43−, EDTA and glycine in the detection of As(V) from aqueous solution was also studied. Further, in an attempt to simulate the real matrix analysis, the tap water sample was spiked with As(V) and subjected for As(V) detection using the modified-CPE.

1. Introduction

Arsenic is widely distributed in all segments of natural environment viz., air, soil and water [1, 2]. Arsenic exists mainly in two different oxidation states i.e., As(III) (arsenite) and As(V) (arsenate) having various chemical species. The speciation of these species largely depends upon the pH/pE conditions of aquatic environment. The direct exposure of arsenic is highly toxic to the entire ecosystem [3, 4]. Although the elemental arsenic possesses no toxicity however, the inorganic arsenic compounds are highly toxic. Therefore, based on the adequate studies, arsenic and its compounds are eventually classified to Group 1 carcinogen [5, 6]. Arsenic toxicity leads to lung, skin, and bladder cancer and kidney related diseases [710]. The ground water at different places in India, China, Bangladesh, Mexico, Argentina, USA and many other countries around the globe are contaminated with arsenic. Moreover, at places, the situation is greatly alarming. Moreover, a rough estimate accounts that above 100 million people are affected with arsenic poisoning at different regions of world [1113]. Therefore, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the World Health Organization (WHO) minimized the maximum contamination level (MCL) of arsenic from 50 μg/L to 10 μg/L in drinking water supply [14]. A low permissible limit of arsenic in water bodies compels to introduce a reliable and efficient sensing device for trace to sub-trace level detection of arsenic from aqueous solutions. Further, an on-site detection with required selectivity is an important aspect needs to be studied in sensor development.
In a line, electrochemical sensors find wide attention in the low level detection of several water pollutants in recent past [1518]. Actually, it provides rapid, accurate, cost effective and robust instrumentation [1923]. Literature survey reveals that several studies were conducted for the low level detection and measurements of arsenic from aqueous solutions using the electrochemical approach [2430]. These studies are widely conducted for the detection of As(III) at highly acidic conditions from aqueous solutions. Further, it was reported that the As(V) is relatively stable and found difficult in direct electrochemical detection [3132]. Therefore, As(V) was reduced chemically in situ or off situ to As(III) and then detected from aqueous solutions [31, 3336]. Further, the carbon paste electrode (as working electrode) is a useful device for the easy modification and suitability for target species detection [16, 31]. Therefore, keeping in view the present communication aims to modify the carbon paste electrode using novel hybrid materials and further applied for direct low level detection of As(V) from aqueous solutions at neutral pH conditions. The selectivity of the sensor was well assessed carrying the measurements for real tap water samples spiked with arsenic(V).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Bentonite was procured commercially which was mined at Bhuj, Gujarat, India. It was crushed and sieved to obtain 100 BSS (British Standard sieve i.e., 0.150 mm) mesh size. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) of bentonite was found to be 69.35 meq/100 g of bentonite. Hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (HDTMA), carbon powder (Glassy Spherical Powder 2–12 micron) and titanium wire (0.81 mm) were procured from the Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Cadmium nitrate tetrahydrate, copper(II) sulphate pentahydrate, lead nitrate and manganese nitrate were obtained from Merck India. Ferric nitrate nonahydrate (AR), sodium chloride (AR), sodium nitrite (AR), glycine (AR) and paraffin oil were procured from HiMedia Chemicals, India. Sodium arsenate dibasic heptahydrate AR (98.5% Purity) was obtained from HiMedia Chemicals, India. Sodium metaarsenite was obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Japan. Ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid disodium salt was procured from the Loba Chemie, India. The deionized water is further purified (18 MΩ-cm) using a Millipore water purification system (Milli-Q+).
Further, the bentonite was modified organically using the hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide by the wet cation exchange process summarized elsewhere [37]. The modified bentonite was named as BH material.

2.2. Instrument

The electrochemical studies were carried out using Potentiostat/Galvanostat (Model: SP 50; BioLogic Science Instruments, France). The electrochemical output data was analysed using the ECLab® computer software. Single compartment three electrode cell assembly was employed having Ag|AgCl reference electrode (Model: RE-5B; BASi, USA) and platinum electrode as an auxiliary electrode. The carbon paste electrode was fabricated in the laboratory and then it was used as a working electrode. The electrical circuitry was made using the titanium wires.

2.3. Methodology

The carbon paste electrode was modified with the hybrid material BH and employed as working electrode. The carbon paste was prepared as described elsewhere [38]. Moreover, the release of carbon paste into the bulk solution was also checked by filtering the test solution using 0.25 μ filter paper. This showed that no carbon powder was found onto the filter paper. This indicated that the electrode surface was intact.
Stock solution (1.0 mg/L) of sodium arsenate (As(V)) was prepared dissolving an accurate amount of arsenic salt into the 1.0 mol/L KNO3 solutions. With the successive dilutions, using 1.0 mol/L KNO3 solutions whose pH was pre-adjusted by the drop-wise addition of conc. HNO3/NaOH solutions. Therefore, a required concentration of As(V) was used for electrochemical studies. The effect of interfering ions on As(V) detection was carried out using several cations or anions (150.0 μg/L) and As(V) (32.0 μg/L) solution. Prior conducting the electrochemical experiments, the As(V) solutions were degassed by bubbling high purity nitrogen gas (99.99%), at least, for 10 min.
The cyclic voltammograms were recorded exciting the working electrode against Ag|AgCl reference electrode at a constant or varied scan rate. Bentonite and BH-modified carbon paste electrodes along with the bare carbon paste electrode were employed as working electrodes. The working electrode was excited at an applied potential ± 1.0 V with a scan rate of 100 mV/s having 50.0 μg/L As(V) solution. The samples were scanned at least for 5 cycles and always the third cycle was considered for the measurements. In order to optimize the BH-modified carbon paste electrode function towards the redox behaviour of As(V), a scan rate dependence study was conducted varying the scan rates from 20 to 200 mV/s at a 50.0 μg/L As(V) and at pH 6.0 in 1.0 M KNO3 background electrolyte. The concentration dependence studies were conducted varying the As(V) concentration from 1.0 μg/L to 35.0 μg/L at pH 6.0 using 1.0 M KNO3 and at a constant scan rate of 100 mV/s. The electrochemical data was obtained for six replicate samples and an error is mentioned with the ± S.E. values.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Effect of Scan Rate

The CVs are presented as a function of scan rate in Fig. 1. The figure clearly shows that an increase in scan rates is apparently caused to increase in electrochemical signals (i.e., both cathodic and anodic peak currents).
Further, the electrochemically active surface area is obtained using the Randles-Sevik equation [37] (Eq. 1):
where I is the peak cathodic current (A); n is the number of electrons involved in reduction; D is the diffusion coefficient of arsenic (cm2/s); ν is the scan rate (V/s); C is the concentration of arsenic (mol/L); and A is the electroactive surface area of working electrode (cm2). The anodic peak current was plotted against the square root of scan rates (Fig. 2). A good linearity is obtained between the oxidative current (I) vs ν1/2 (ν: scan rate) (cf Fig. 2). The slope of the straight line (Fig. 2) is utilized to obtain the electroactive surface area of BH-modified carbon paste electrode. The diffusion coefficient of arsenic in water was taken 8.12×10−6 cm2/s for the As(III) [39], perhaps, as a reference value. The calculated surface area of the BH-modified electrode was found to be 3.763 mm2. This value apparently relates the number of specific sites available onto the electrode surface for efficient redox process to occur [40].

3.2. Cyclic Voltammetric Results

Cyclic Voltammograms for the redox behavior of As(V) using various CPEs is presented graphically in Fig. 3. Fig. 3 clearly shows that no significant change in CV pattern is occurred both in the bentonite- or BH-modified carbon paste electrodes. Nevertheless, a substantial increase in electrical signal is obtained; in particular, the anodic current is increased using the bentonite- or hybrid material-modified carbon paste electrodes comparing to the pristine carbon paste electrode. It is also noted that an additional increase in anodic current was obtained using the BH-modified electrode than the pristine bentonite-modified carbon paste electrode. These results clearly showed that the As(V) possessed relatively stronger affinity towards the hybrid material than the pristine bentonite. This is in accordance to the sorption data that obtained separately and presented elsewhere [41]. Similarly, the ΔEp was found to be 0.0154 V for the BH-modified electrode. Relatively low value of ΔEp was indicated to reversible nature of arsenic at the electrode surface [19]. Moreover, it also inferred that the arsenic was sorbed onto the electrode surface more strongly and giving out an enhanced electrical signal which therefore, be utilized for efficient sensor development [4142].
Further, Fig. 3 clearly demonstrated that the voltammograms were found to be identical for all the three electrodes employed. It is also observed that a stepwise oxidation/reduction take place at the electrode surface. A dominant peak at an applied potential of Ca + 0.15 is due to the As(0) which is oxidized to As(III) at the potential + 0.71 V (vs Ag|AgCl) and at very high potential it is further oxidized to As(V) showing a significant high current. The reverse scan showed that the As(V) is reduced to the As(III) with a 2 electron reduction process at an applied potential of Ca + 0.83 (vs Ag|AgCl). As(III) is then reduced to As(0) with 3 electron reduction is observed at an applied potential of Ca + 0.16 V (vs Ag|AgCl). The reversible 3 and 2 electron redox processes are demonstrated as:
A similar observation was reported previously using the surface of platinum nanoparticle modified glassy carbon electrodes, the As(0) is oxidized to the As(III) at a potential Ca + 0.2 V (vs SCE) and further oxidized to the As(V) at the potential Ca + 0.85 V (vs SCE) [21, 43].

3.3. Concentration Dependence Studies

The concentration dependence CVs are obtained at an applied potential of ± 1.0 V and illustrated in Fig. 4. The cyclic voltammograms for As(V) exhibited a characteristic oxidative peak at Ca 0.21 V and 0.22 V for the pristine bentonite- and hybrid material-modified electrodes, respectively at pH 6.0 (cf Fig. 4 shown for BH-modified electrode). The anodic peak current was utilized to obtain the calibration line. A reasonably good linearity between the oxidative peak current and the concentration of As(V) was obtained for the studied concentration range (1.0 μg/L to 35.0 μg/L) using the BH-modified electrode. The calibration line equation is presented as: I = 0.0325 x C (μg/L) + 7.266 (R2 = 0.991) (Inset Fig. 4). The straight line equation, I = 0.029 x C (μg/L) + 7.142 (R2= 0.855) was obtained for the pristine bentonite-modified electrode. It is therefore indicated that pristine bentonite modified carbon paste electrode possessed with distorted relationship between the anodic peak current and concentration of As(V). An useful linear relationship between the anodic peak current with the As(V) concentration could therefore be utilized in the successful low level detection of As(V) from aqueous solution. This further be employed for the development of electroanalytical tool for low level As(V) detection.
The analytical methods are validated with the useful quantities viz., limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) which are estimated using the standard equations described previously [37]. The LOD and LOQ values were found to be 1.61 μg/L and 5.38 μg/L, respectively. Interesting to note that the value of LOD was found to be reasonably low comparing to value prescribed for arsenic level in drinking water i.e., 10.0 μg/L. This further indicated the possible implication of electrochemical device using the BH-modified carbon paste electrode in the trace level detection of As(V) from aqueous solutions. It was reported previously that the carbon Nanotube with silicone showed significant enhanced detection limit comparing to the mineral oil. The LOD and LOQ values were reported 10.3 and 34.5 μg/L (for mineral oil); 3.4 μg/L and 11.2 μg/L (for silicone), respectively [44]. Similarly, the detection limit was obtained 4.4 μg/L for As(V) with the determination limit 11 μg/L [45]. A direct electrochemical determination of As(V) in neutral pH waters was conducted using the Mn-coated gold electrode under the anodic stripping voltammetric (ASV) studies. As(V) was reduced to As(III) in presence of elemental Mn onto the working electrode surface. Further, the micro-wire (Mn coated gold) electrode was vibrated during the deposition step to improve the sensitivity and the detection limit was found to be 0.2 nM As(V) at a deposition time of 180 s [35].
However, the other studies indicated very low detection limit of As(III) i.e., 0.1 μg/L was obtained using the Au-Nanoparticle modified carbon nanotubes [46]. On the other hand, the functionalized Au-Nano-particles showed the LOD and LOQ values of 2.5 and 8.4, respectively as obtained by the visible spectroscopic technique [6].

3.4. Effect of Cations and Anions Interference in the Detection of As(V)

The presence of co-existing ions viz., Cu(II), Pb(II), Cd(II), Mn(II) and Fe(III) and anions viz., Cl, NO3, PO43−, EDTA and glycine, having 150 μg/L of each, in the detection of As(V) is an useful parameter to simulate the studies for the real matrix complex system. Therefore, the estimation of As(V) (32 μg/L) at pH 6.0 was conducted in presence of these ions and results are illustrated in Table 1. It is noted that the CVs obtained for As(V) in presence of these co-existing ions are almost unaffected within the exciting potential ± 1.0 V. This further reaffirms that the detection of As(V) is possible even in presence of these ions. It is clearly evident from the Table 1 that the concentration of As(V) is not much affected in presence of co-existing ions (except Fe(III)). Fe(III) slightly affected the As(V) determination. This is possibly due to the oxidation of Fe(0) to Fe(III) around the same applied potential. It was reported previously that the use of constant current stripping analysis (CCSA) was successfully employed in the determination of As(III) and As(V) from aqueous solutions in presence of Cu(II). The detection limit was reported to be 3 ppb and 0.5 ppb for As(III) and As(V), respectively [47]. Similarly, the Cu(II) was not interfered the As(III) determination from aqueous solutions using the Pt-Nanoparticle modified glassy carbon electrodes [48].

3.5. Real Matrix Analysis

Detection of As(V) is investigated in As(V) spiked tap water samples. Standard additions of As(V) was conducted in solution preparations using the available tap water. The tap water was subjected for the total organic carbon (TOC) and inorganic carbon (IC) analysis using a TOC analyzer (Model: TOC-VCPH/CPN; Shimadzu, Japan). The TOC and IC values were found to be 1.198 mg/L and 6.478 mg/L, respectively. This clearly showed that the tap water was contained with significant amount of inorganic carbon i.e., possibly due to the presence of carbonates or bicarbonates of alkali metals. Moreover, it also possessed with some organic carbon. The electrochemical response of As(V), prepared in tap water, onto the BH modified-CPE is almost identical comparing to the purified water scan. No obvious change in the CV pattern of As(V) is observed in the water sample indicated the potential application of working electrode in real water sample analysis. It is obvious from the results that the sensitivity of the analytical data is slightly suppressed in the tap water analysis. However, an optimum and required linearity between the As(V) concentration and anodic peak current was obtained which could help in real water sample analysis and possibly be employed in the real water sample analysis (cf Fig. 5). A similar observation was obtained for the low level detection of Cd(II) from aqueous solutions using the modified carbon paste electrodes [49].

3.6. Presence of As(III) and As(V)

The concentration of As(III) was varied from the 5.0 μg/L to 45.0 μg/L but the total concentration of As(III) and As(V) was kept constant to 50.0 μg/L. The cyclic voltammograms were obtained in 1.0 mol/L KNO3 solutions and at a scan rate 100 mV/s pH 6.0. The results obtained are demonstrated in Fig. 6. It is observed that the cathodic or anodic peak current is not significantly changed varying the As(III) concentration from 5.0 μg/L to 45.0 μg/L.
The results, therefore, indicated that the total concentration of arsenic was obtained as constant. The average oxidative peak current is found to be 7.866 ± 0.573 μA (3.σ) at pH 6.0. These results are in good approximation of estimating total arsenic in solutions.

4. Conclusions

The cyclic voltammetric studies exhibited characteristic reversible behavior of As(V) in aqueous solution using 1.0 mol/L KNO3 solutions and employing the hybrid material modified carbon paste electrode. A significant enhanced electrochemical signal was obtained with the hybrid material (BH)- or pristine bentonite-modified carbon paste electrode compared to the unmodified carbon paste electrode. The concentration dependence study unveiled the higher affinity of As(V) towards the BH-modified electrode compared to the pristine bentonite-modified electrode for the As(V) detection. The presence of co-existing ions viz., Cu(II), Cd(II), Mn(II), Pb(II), Cl, NO3, PO43−, EDTA and glycine was not affected significantly the detection of As(V) from the aqueous solution. However, the presence of Fe(III) slightly influenced the As(V) determination. The limit of detection and limit of quantification was found to be 1.61 and 5.38 μg/L, respectively using the BH-modified carbon paste electrode. The electrochemical detection of As(V) from tap water samples using the hybrid material-modified carbon paste electrode was found reasonably well hence, possibly, be employed for the trace detection of As(V) from aqueous solutions. Moreover, a single voltammogram could be used for the detection of total arsenic i.e., As(III) + As(V) from aqueous solutions.


One of authors DT wishes to acknowledge the CSIR, New Delhi for the financial support as in the form of Research Project (vide No.: 01 (2567)/12/EMR-II).


1. Yang T, Chen ML, Liu LH, Wang JH, Dasgupta PKIron(III) modification of bacillus subtilis membranes provides record sorption capacity for arsenic and endows unusual selectivity for As(V). Environ Sci Technol. 2012;46:2251–2256.
crossref pmid

2. Chen M, Lin Y, Gu C, Wang JArsenic sorption and speciation with branch-polyethyleneimine modified carbon nanotubes with detection by atomic fluorescence spectrometry. Talanta. 2003;104:53–57.

3. Su CM, Androbert MArsenate and arsenite removal by zerovalent iron: Kinetics, redox transformation, and implications for in situ groundwater remediation. Environ Sci Technol. 2001;35:1487–1493.
crossref pmid

4. Mandal BK, Suzuki KTArsenic round the world: A review. Talanta. 2002;58:201–235.
crossref pmid

5. IARC. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Supplement 71987.

6. Domínguez-González R, GonzálezVarela L, Bermejo-Barrera PFunctionalized gold nanoparticles for the detection of arsenic in water. Talanta. 2014;118:262–269.
crossref pmid

7. Tiwari D, Lee SMNovel hybrid materials in the remediation of ground waters contaminated with As(III) and As(V). Chem Eng J. 2012;204–206:23–31.

8. Mohan D, Pittman CUArsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents–A critical review. J Hazard Mater. 2007;142:1–53.
crossref pmid

9. Tiwari D, Laldawngliana C, Lee SMImmobilized small sized manganese dioxide sand in the remediation of arsenic contaminated water. Environ Eng Res. 2014;19:107–113.

10. Cacho F, Lauko L, Manova A, Beinrohr EOn-line electrochemical pre-concentration of arsenic on a gold coated porous carbon electrode for graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. J Anal At Spectrom. 2012;27:695–699.

11. Cornejo L, Lienqueo H, Arenas M, et alIn field arsenic removal from natural water by zero-valent iron assisted by solar radiation. Environ Pollut. 2008;156:827–831.
crossref pmid

12. Lin MC, Liao CMAssessing the risks on human health associated with inorganic arsenic intake from groundwater-cultured milkfish in southwestern Taiwan. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:701–709.
crossref pmid

13. Lalhmunsiama , Tiwari D, Lee SMActivated carbon and manganese coated activated carbon precursor to dead biomass in the remediation of arsenic contaminated water. Environ Eng Res. 2012;17:S1S41–S48.

14. WHO. World Health Organization [Internet]. Available from: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs210/en/

15. Gupta P, Goyal RNPolymelamine modified edge plane pyrolytic graphite sensor for the electrochemical assay of serotonin. Talanta. 2014;120:17–22.
crossref pmid

16. Tonle IK, Ngameni E, Tcheumi HL, Tchieda VH, Carteret C, Walcarius ASorption of methylene blue on an organoclay bearing thiol groups and application to electrochemical sensing of the dye. Talanta. 2008;74:489–497.
crossref pmid

17. Manisankar P, Selvanathan TG, Vedhi CUtilization of sodium montmorillonite clay-modified electrode for the determination of isoproturon and carbendazim in soil and water samples. Appl Clay Sci. 2005;29:249–257.

18. Guo L, Zhang Q, Huang Y, Han Q, Wang Y, Fu YThe application of thionine-graphene nanocomposite in chiral sensing for Tryptophan enantiomers. Bioelectrochemistry. 2013;94:87–93.
crossref pmid

19. Mardegan A, Scopece P, Lamberti F, Meneghetti M, Moretto LM, Ugo PElectroanalysis of trace inorganic arsenic with gold nanoelectrode ensembles. Electroanalysis. 2012;24:798–806.

20. Simm AO, Ordeig O, del Campo J, Munoz FX, Compton RGDiffusional protection of electrode surfaces using regular arrays of immobilised droplets: Overcoming interferences in electroanalysis. Analyst. 2006;131:987–989.
crossref pmid

21. Dai X, Compton RGDirect electrodeposition of gold nanoparticles onto indium tin oxide film coated glass: Application to the detection of arsenic(III). Anal Sci. 2006;22:567–570.
crossref pmid

22. Profumo A, Merli D, Pesavento MVoltammetric determination of inorganic As(III) and total inorganic As in natural waters. Anal Chim Acta. 2005;539:245–250.

23. Feeney R, Kounaves SPOn-site analysis of arsenic in groundwater using a microfabricated gold ultramicroelectrode array. Anal Chem. 2000;72:2222–2228.
crossref pmid

24. Forsberg G, O’Laughlin JW, Megargle RGDetermination of arsenic by anodic stripping voltammetry and differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chem. 1975;47:1586–1592.

25. Hua C, Jagner D, Renman LAutomated determination of total arsenic in sea water by flow constant-current stripping analysis with gold fibre electrodes. Anal Chim Acta. 1987;201:263–268.

26. Hamilton TW, Ellis JDetermination of arsenic and antimony in electrolytic copper by anodic stripping voltammetry at a gold film electrode. Anal Chim Acta. 1980;119:225–233.

27. Simm AO, Banks CE, Compton RGSonically assisted electroanalytical detection of ultratrace arsenic. Anal Chem. 2004;76:5051–5055.
crossref pmid

28. Simm AO, Banks CE, Compton RGThe electrochemical detection of arsenic(III) at a silver electrode. Electroanalysis. 2005;17:1727–1733.

29. Dai X, Nekrassova O, Hyde ME, Compton RGAnodic stripping voltammetry of arsenic(III) using gold nanoparticle-modified electrodes. Anal Chem. 2004;76:5924–5929.
crossref pmid

30. Simm AO, Banks CE, Wilkins SJ, Karousos NG, Davis J, Compton RGA comparison of different types of gold-carbon composite electrode for detection of arsenic(III). Anal Bioanal Chem. 2005;381:979–985.
crossref pmid

31. Greulach U, Henze GAnalysis of arsenic(V) by cathodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta. 1995;306:217–223.

32. Hcnze G, Neeb RElektrochemische Analytik. Springer-Vcrlag; Berlin: 1986. p. 185

33. Mardegan A, Scopece P, Lamberti F, Meneghetti M, Moretto LM, Ugo PElectroanalysis of trace inorganic arsenic with gold nanoelectrode ensembles. Electroanalysis. 2012;24:798–806.

34. Svancara I, Yytras K, Bobrowski A, Kalcher KDetermination of arsenic at a gold-plated carbon paste electrode using constant current stripping analysis. Talanta. 2002;58:45–55.
crossref pmid

35. Gibbon-Walsh K, Salaün P, van den Berg CMGDetermination of arsenate in natural pH seawater using a manganese-coated gold microwire electrode. Anal Chim Acta. 2012;710:50–57.
crossref pmid

36. Bodewig FG, Valenta P, Nurnberg HWTrace determination of As(III) and As(V) in natural waters by differential pulse anodic stripping voltammetry. Z Anal Chem. 1982;311:187–191.

37. Lee SM, Lalhmunsiama , Thanhmingliana , Tiwari DPorous hybrid materials in the remediation of water contaminated with As(III) and As(V). Chem Eng J. 2015;270:496–507.

38. Zirlianngura , Jamsheera A, Tiwari D, Lee SMEfficient use of novel hybrid materials in the ultra-trace determination of arsenic from aqueous solutions: An electrochemical study. Desal Wat Treat. 2016;57:18730–18738.

39. Tanaka M, Takahashia Y, Yamaguchi N, Kim KW, Zheng G, Sakamitsu MThe difference of diffusion coefficients in water for arsenic compounds at various pH and its dominant factors implied by molecular simulations. Geochim et Cosmochim Acta. 2013;105:360–371.

40. Salinas-torres D, Huerta F, Montilla F, Morallon EStudy on electroactive and electrocatalytic surfaces of single walled carbon nanotube-modified electrodes. Electrochim Acta. 2011;56:2464–2470.

41. Afkhami A, Ghaedi H, Madrakian T, Nematollahi D, Mokhtari BElectro-oxidation and voltammetric determination of oxymetholone in the presence of mestanolone using glassy carbon electrode modified with carbon nanotubes. Talanta. 2014;121:1–8.
crossref pmid

42. Ndlovu T, Mamba BB, Sampath S, Krause RW, Arotiba OAVoltammetric detection of arsenic on a bismuth modified exfoliated graphite electrode. Electrochim Acta. 2014;128:48–53.

43. Cabelka TD, Austin DS, Johnson DCElectrocatalytic oxidation of As(III). Voltammetric studies at Pt electrodes. J Electrochem Soc. 1984;131:1595–1602.

44. Teixeira MC, de Tavares EFL, Saczk AA, et alCathodic stripping voltammetric determination of arsenic in sugarcane brandy at a modified carbon nanotube paste electrode. Food Chem. 2014;154:38–43.
crossref pmid

45. Greulach U, Henze GAnalysis of arsenic(V) by cathodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta. 1995;306:217–223.

46. Xiao L, Wildgoose GG, Compton RGSensitive electrochemical detection of arsenic (III) using gold nanoparticle modified carbon nanotubes via anodic stripping voltammetry. Anal Chim Acta. 2008;620:44–49.
crossref pmid

47. Svancara I, Yytras K, Bobrowski A, Kalcher KDetermination of arsenic at a gold-plated carbon paste electrode using constant current stripping analysis. Talanta. 2002;58:45–55.
crossref pmid

48. Dai X, Compton RGDetection of As(III) via oxidation to As(V) using platinum nanoparticle modified glassy carbon electrodes: Arsenic detection without interference from copper. Analyst. 2006;131:516–521.
crossref pmid

49. Lee SM, Zirlianngura , Anjudikkal J, Tiwari DElectrochemical sensor for trace determination of cadmium(II) from aqueous solutions: Use of hybrid materials precursors to natural clays. Int J Environ Anal Chem. 2016;96:490–504.

Fig. 1
Cyclic voltammograms of As(V) using hybrid material modified carbon paste electrode as a function of scan rate in 1.0 M KNO3 at pH 6.0.
Fig. 2
Plot of current I vs ν1/2 using hybrid material modified carbon paste electrode.
Fig. 3
Cyclic voltammograms of As(V) using carbon paste (CPE), bentonite-modified (BCPE) and BH-modified (BHCPE) carbon paste electrodes at pH 6.0 in 1.0 M KNO3 and at scan rate 100 mV/s.
Fig. 4
Calibration curves obtained for As(V) in 1.0 M KNO3 solution using BH-modified electrode at varied concentrations of As(V) (1.0 μg/L to 35.0 μg/L) at pH 6.0 and scan rate 100 mV/s.
Fig. 5
Calibration line for the As(V) in tap water with BH-modified electrode at varied concentrations of As(V) (10.0 μg/L to 25.0 μg/L) at scan rate of 100 mV/s.
Fig. 6
Cyclic voltammograms obtained for the varied concentration of As(III) keeping total arsenic concentration 50.0 μg/L at pH 6.0 [Series A: 5 As(III) + 45 As(V); B: 10 As(III) + 40 As(V); C: 15 As(III) + 35 As(V); D: 20 As(III) + 30 As(V); E: 25 As(III) + 25 As(V); F: 30 As(III) + 20 As(V); G: 35 As(III) + 15 As(V); H: 40 As(III) + 10 As(V); I: 45 As(III) + 5 As(V)].
Table 1
Concentration of As(V) Calculated in Presence of Several Co-existing Ions
Interfering Ions Concentration of As(V) (μg/L)
As(V) 32.00 ± 0.80
Cu(II) 34.35 ± 0.76
Mn(II) 33.23 ± 0.59
Pb(II) 32.49 ± 0.84
Cd(II) 31.94 ± 0.79
Fe(III) 38.31 ± 0.89
Cl 33.34 ± 0.48
NO3 32.49 ± 0.65
PO43− 32.80 ± 0.68
EDTA 34.79 ± 0.85
Glycine 31.70 ± 0.90
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Supplement  Supplement
Editorial Office
1309, Korea Business Center 1338-21, Seocho 2-dong, Seocho-gu, Seoul, South Korea
TEL : +82-2-383-9697   FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. All rights reserved.                Powerd by M2community
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers