| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Contact Us |  
Environ Eng Res > Volume 20(2); 2015 > Article
Tosu, Luepromchai, and Suttinun: Activation and immobilization of phenol-degrading bacteria on oil palm residues for enhancing phenols degradation in treated palm oil mill effluent

Abstract

The presence of phenols in treated palm oil mill effluent (POME) is an environmental concern due to their phytotoxicity and antimicrobial activity. In this study, phenol-degrading bacteria, Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1 were immobilized on oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFBs) for removal of phenols in the treated POME. The bacterial exopolysaccharides (EPS) were responsible for cell adhesion to the EFBs during the immobilization process. These immobilized bacteria could effectively remove up to 5,000 mg/L phenol in a carbon free mineral medium (CFMM) with a greater degradation efficiency and rate than that with suspended bacteria. To increase the efficiency of the immobilized bacteria, three approaches, namely activation, acclimation, and combined activation and acclimation were applied. The most convenient and efficient strategy was found when the immobilized bacteria were activated in a CFMM containing phenol for 24 h before biotreatment of the treated POME. These activated immobilized bacteria were able to remove about 63.4% of 33 mg/L phenols in the treated POME, while non-activated and/or acclimated immobilized bacteria could degrade only 35.0%. The activated immobilized bacteria could be effectively reused for at least ten application cycles and stored for 4 weeks at 4°C with the similar activities. In addition, the utilization of the abundant EFBs gives value-added to the palm oil mill wastes and is environmentally friendly thus making it is attractive for practical application.

1. Introduction

Palm oil is one of the major vegetable oils and a raw material for biofuel production. The largest palm oil producers are mainly in South East Asia, namely Malaysia, Indonesia and Thailand [1]. During process of wet palm oil extraction, large quantities of solid residues and wastewater are produced. Oil palm empty fruit bunches (EFBs) are among the most abundant residues obtained after the palm fruits are separated from the bunches for oil extraction. In Thailand, approximately EFBs of 9.0 × 105 ton/year are produced. However, only small amounts of EFBs are utilized as fuel and fertilizer in the palm oil mills and plantations, while most of them are left as waste [2]. Moreover, about 5–7.5 tones of water are used for 1 ton of crude palm oil production and more than 50% of the water used results in palm oil mill effluent (POME) [3].
POME generally contains high organic content and phenols which are responsible for the recalcitrant dark brown color of wastewater. Phenols are a group of substances commonly found in palm fruits. Alam et al. [4] and Cordova-Rosa et al. [5] reported that more than 1,000 mg/L phenols were present in POME. The most common conventional methods used for the treatment of POME are anaerobic digestion and/or anaerobic ponding systems [6, 7]. However, these methods are not effective in eliminating phenols to meet the regulatory standard required. This is because these compounds exhibit inhibitory effects on microorganisms and are not easily degraded [811]. Phenols cause serious health effects and are potentially toxic to living organisms in the environment [10, 1213]. In addition, the contamination of phenols in water can lead to the formation of substituted compounds during disinfection process which increases taste and odor in the water supply [14]. Thus, the treated POME requires further treatment method prior to its discharge into waterways.
Various physico-chemical and biological processes including activated carbon adsorption, membrane technology, evaporation, oxidation and biological degradation have been employed for the removal of phenols [15]. Among them, biological method is considered to be more attractive treatment option since it has high potential to eliminate phenols content at a low cost and is environmentally friendly. A number of different bacteria and white-rot fungi, such as Ralstonia sp., Pseudomonas putida [16, 17], Azotobacter vinelandii [18], Lentinula edodes [19], Phanerochaete chrysosporium [20], Geotrichum candidum [20, 21], and Trametes versicolor [22] have been shown to aerobically degrade many phenols found in olive mill wastewater (OMW). OMW usually contains high concentrations of phenols similar to POME. To minimize the effect of high concentrations of phenols, the OMW was usually diluted before biotreatment [23, 24]. However, it is considered as an unsustainable method since larger wastewater volume is generated. On the other hand, Ergül et al. [22] proposed that the high phenolic content of OMW can be effectively reduced by using an acclimated white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor FPRL 28A INI. They found that about 78% of total phenols in the undiluted OMW were removed after this strain was consecutively acclimated in the different dilutions of OMW. The cell immobilization of white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium was also applied to solve this problem. However, this approach was not successful for the undiluted OMW due to the very high concentration of phenols [25].
There are limited researches on the removal of phenols from POME. Recently, Limkhuansuwan and Chaiprasert [26] reported that free cells of Lactobacillus plantarum SFS.6 could degrade 34% of 33.64 mg/L phenols in treated POME. The low phenol removal efficiency could be due to the toxicity of POME to the bacterial cells, thus this study focused on the application of immobilized bacteria for phenol removal from the treated POME. To develop an effective bacterial inoculum, this study determined the ability of two phenol-degrading bacteria, Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1 after immobilizing on EFBs. The mixed bacteria were found to be tolerant and specifically degrade phenol in concentrations of up to 5,000 mg/L while they were immobilized on silica [27]. However, the bacterial encapsulation in such matrix may be expensive for wastewater treatment while attachment immobilization on natural material such as EFBs is cheaper. In addition, the utilization of the abundant EFBs gives value-added to the palm oil mill wastes and is environmentally friendly thus making it is attractive for practical application. To increase the efficiency of the immobilized bacteria, three approaches, namely activation, acclimation, and combined activation and acclimation were applied. Prior to biodegradation, they were activated in a carbon free mineral medium (CFMM) containing phenol to induce/maintain phenol-degrading enzymes due to the absence of phenol during cell immobilization. Alternatively, they were acclimated by cultivating in diluted POME to minimize the toxicity of phenols in the undiluted POME. The combination of these two techniques by sequential activation in phenol-CFMM and acclimation in diluted POME was also performed. Moreover, the reusability of immobilized bacteria for POME treatment was evaluated.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Treated POME Sample

The treated POME sample was obtained from the wastewater treatment plant of a palm oil mill located in southern Thailand. The sample was collected from the final pond of a three series stabilization pond system and stored at −20°C until used. The POME sample was prepared by filtration using cheesecloth to eliminate unwanted debris and was sterilized by autoclaving at 121°C for 15 min prior to use. The main characteristics of the treated POME are shown in Table 2.

2.2. Preparation of Phenol Degrading Inoculum

Mixed cultures of two bacterial strains, namely Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1 were used for the biodegradation of phenols in a liquid CFMM or treated POME sample. The CFMM consisted of 3.0 g/L NH4NO3; 2.2 g/L Na2HPO4; 0.8 g/L KH2PO4; 0.1 g/L MgSO4·7H2O; 0.05 g/L FeCl3·6H2O and 0.05 g/L CaCl2·2H2O [28]. The inocula were prepared as previously mentioned in Khongkhaem et al. [27]. Briefly, each strain was cultivated independently in the liquid CFMM containing 0.4% glucose and was incubated on an orbital shaker at 200 rpm, room temperature for 72 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 8,000 rpm for 10 min, washed twice and re-suspended in fresh CFMM containing 10 mg/L of phenol. The cell suspensions were incubated for 24 h at room temperature with 200 rpm shaking to induce the formation of phenol-degrading enzymes. The induced-cells were harvested, washed and resuspended in fresh CFMM to a final OD578 of 1.0 (corresponding to approximately 108 CFU/mL) before they were mixed equally and used as an inoculum in the biodegradation experiment.

2.3. Immobilization of Bacteria on EFBs

The EFBs used as the immobilizing material are solid residues from palm oil extraction process obtained from a palm oil mill in Southern Thailand. The EFBs were cut into segments of about 2 × 2.5 × 2 cm3, oven-dried at 50°C for 24–48 h and autoclaved at 121°C for 20 min to eliminate the existing microorganisms prior to use. The surface area and total pore volume of the EFBs were analyzed by surface area analyzer (BelsorpII mini; BEL, Japan) and calculated according to Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET), Langmuir plot and Barrer-Joyner-Halenda (BJH). The immobilization of the cells was carried out by the attachment technique, in which 30 mL of bacterial inoculum in CFMM were added into a 250-mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 9 g of EFBs. The mixture of bacteria and EFBs residue were incubated at room temperature by shaking at 120 rpm. The bacteria were incubated along with the sterilized EFBs without an additional carbon source for various periods. With carbon starvation, the excess nitrogen (0.91% N found in EFBs) is converted to protein and amino acid in the exopolysaccharide (EPS) which enhanced the cell surface hydrophobicity as well as increasing the attachment ability [29, 30].
To obtain bacteria well-attached to the surface of the EFBs, the production of bacterial exopolysaccharide was monitored daily by a modified Alcian blue adsorption assay of Vandevivere and Kirchman [31]. The immobilized cells materials were filtered and added to new vials containing 30 mL CFMM and 1% Alcian blue solution in 3% acetic acid (pH = 2.5). The immobilized cells materials were mixed thoroughly by shaking at 80 rpm for 20 min, and then they were removed. Subsequently, the measurement of the Alcian blue remaining in the solution was performed spec-trophotometrically at 606 nm (UV-1601; Shimadzu, Japan). The amount of bacterial EPS produced was estimated by the decline of the Alcian blue dye due to its adsorption on EPS. The unin-oculated EFBs were used as a negative control.
The bacterial attachment was visualized by a scanning electron microscope (FEI Quanta 400; FEI, USA). Initially, the immobilized cells materials were fixed with glutaraldehyde, dehydrated by sequential ethanol extraction, and dried by a critical point dryer. The samples were put on the stub then coated with gold before SEM analysis.
In addition, the number of phenol-degrading bacteria attached on the EFBs was analyzed by a plate count technique after the bacteria were extracted from the EFBs. The immobilized cells materials were rehydrated in a CFMM for 3 min, sonicated (T780 ultrasonic bath; Elma, Germany) for 2 min, and shaken vigorously on a vortex mixer for another 2 min (a method modified from Pattanasupong et al. [32]). These procedures were repeated twice. Subsequently, the suspensions of the cells were determined for the number of bacteria on glucose-CFMM. The samples were measured in duplicate.

2.4. Effect of Phenol Concentrations on Suspended and Immobilized Bacteria

Immobilized bacteria were tested for their ability to degrade different initial phenol concentrations. The biodegradation experiment was conducted in a 22-mL vial containing 5 mL CFMM with the phenol concentrations in the range of 10–5,000 mg/L and 0.5 g immobilized cells materials. For suspended bacteria, 4 mL CFMM containing phenol and 1 mL cell suspension were added into the vial. The number of bacteria in both systems was similar. The samples were incubated at room temperature and shaken at 120 rpm. The sampling was done every 24 h for 24–120 h to determine the remaining phenol. The efficiency of the phenol degradation was presented as the % degradation and the degradation rate constant (h−1). The controls, consisting of heat-killed cells and uninoculated EFBs, were used to represent the adsorption of phenol on bacterial cells and on the material. The experiment was done in triplicate.

2.5. Phenol Degradation in Treated POME by Activated and/or Acclimated Bacteria

To induce/maintain phenol-degrading enzymes after cell immobilization, the immobilized bacteria were activated in a liquid CFMM containing 10 mg/L phenol for 24 h before the POME treatment. Alternatively, they were consecutively transferred to 25% diluted POME for 120 h and 50% diluted POME for another 120 h for cell acclimatization to the phenols present in POME. The combination of these two techniques which were 24 h activation in phenol-CFMM and then 240 h acclimation in each 25% and 50% diluted POME was also studied. The treatment of the POME was conducted in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask containing 30 mL POME and 9 g immobilized cells materials. Samples were incubated at room temperature and shaken at 120 rpm for 168 h. Sampling was done every 24 h for determining the remaining phenols and other characteristics of the treated POME. The controls consisted of non-activated and non-acclimated immobilized bacteria. The experiment was done in triplicate.

2.6. Reusability of Immobilized Bacteria

The reusability of immobilized bacteria was examined to assess whether they could be applied repeatedly. After the first application in phenol-CFMM or in treated POME, the used immobilized bacteria were separated from the liquid content and reused for further treatment under similar conditions. Their efficiency to remove phenol(s) in each application cycle was compared.

2.7. Analysis of Treated POME and Phenols

The following characteristics of the treated POME were analyzed according to the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater [33]: pH; COD; total nitrogen; total phosphorus; oil and grease; phenols and color. The phenols were determined by a standard colorimetric assay. This was done with 4-aminoantipyrine in the presence of ammonium hydroxide and potassium ferricyanide which produced a coloured antipyrine dye that was measured spectrophotometrically at 500 nm (UV 1601; Shimadzu, Japan).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Formation of EPS by Strain NP3 and PK1 during Attachment on EFBs

An attachment technique was applied for the immobilization of Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1 on the EFBs. The complex structure and high porosity of EFBs with a total pore volume of 0.44 cm3/g and BET surface area of 4.17 m2/g makes it a suitable support for cell immobilization. EFBs had a similar total pore volume but much lower specific surface area compared to the commercial absorbent such as activated carbon (0.43 cm3/g and 907.8–1,100 m2/g, respectively) [34, 35].
It was necessary to ensure stable cell adhesion to the solid surface of the EFBs. To assess this, the production of EPS during the attachment process was determined by the decrease in absorbance of Alcian blue dye in the supernatant measured spectrophotometrically at A606. There was no change in the A606 detected in the uninoculated control materials throughout the course of the study, ensuring no sorption of this dye on the EFBs. In addition, the EPS formation was not present in the monoculture and mixed culture (strain NP3 and PK1) immobilization during the first three days of incubation (Fig. 1). After 3 days, both the monoculture and mixed cultures were able to produce much EPS as seen from the rapid decrease in A606 of the Alcian blue. A longer incubation led to greater EPS synthesis in all samples. However, the highest rate of EPS production was obtained when two strains were mixed together obtaining a maximum 85% yield of EPS after 6 days incubation. In accord with earlier findings, the mixed culture of S. thermophilus 13a and L. bulgaricus exhibited higher EPS synthesizing activity compared to the single strain due to a mutual stimulation of cell metabolism [36].
The bacterial EPS is essential for biofilm formation, aggregating and sheathing the cells as well as protecting them against adverse conditions [37]. SEM photomicrographs revealed that bacteria produced EPS fibers in cells adhering to the surfaces and to other microorganisms (Fig. 2). From the results in this section, mixed cultures of the strains NP3 and PK1 were incubated along with EFBs for 6 days to obtain a strong attachment. These were used for further biodegradation tests.

3.2. Effect of Phenol Concentration on Activity of Strain NP3 and PK1

Phenol, the simplest member of the family of phenols, was used in this study as a representative of this compound group to assess its impact on Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1. The capacities of immobilized and suspended bacteria to degrade phenol were compared in liquid CFMM containing different initial phenol concentrations ranging from 10 to 5,000 mg/L. In the control samples with killed-cells and EFBs only, the reduction of the phenol was very low (≤5%). Thus, the loss of phenol by abiotic processes was negligible.
The immobilized bacteria showed greater degradation efficiency and degradation rate constant (k) than that of suspended bacteria, at all phenol concentrations, except when the concentration was below 30 mg/L (Fig. 3(a), (b)). On the other hand, an inhibitory effect was observed in the suspended bacteria when the phenol concentration increased as seen from the decreased degrading efficiency and rate. These results indicated that suspended bacteria were inhibited by elevated concentrations of phenol, while the immobilized bacteria were more tolerant of phenol of up to 5,000 mg/L. This difference was attributed to the fact that the cells of the immobilized bacteria were protected of against the toxicity of phenol through their biofilm and immobilizing support. The bacterial biofilm and organic material can act as a buffer in shielding bacteria from high exposure to high concentrations of phenols, adsorbing and slowly releasing them for bacterial degradation [38]. Our results corresponded to previous studies of Khongkhaem et al. [27], Ying et al. [39] and Ahmad et al. [40]. They reported that better phenol degradation activity was achieved when a mixture of Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1, Acinetobacter sp. strain PD12 or Acinetobacter sp. strain AQ5NOL1 were immobilized in silica, polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) or gellan gum, respectively. However, the EFBs used in this study were palm oil mill waste and considered as inexpensive compared to other immobilizing materials.
Nonetheless, one major disadvantage of using immobilized cells is the mass transfer limitation involved in substrate diffusion to the cells [41]. This could explain why the immobilized bacteria had lower degradation activity at low phenol concentrations compared to suspended bacteria. In addition, the k values for immobilized bacteria in this study (0.01–0.47 h−1) (Fig. 3(b)) were lower than those reported by Ying et al. [39] (0.65–1.38 h−1). This may be because the ranges of initial phenol concentrations used were different and/or our experiment had lower cells density attached to EFBs (1.13 mg cells L−1 phenol-CFMM), while much higher cells were entrapped by PVA (24.6 mg cells L−1).

3.3. Removal of Phenols from Treated POME by Activated and/or Acclimated Immobilized Bacteria

Three approaches were evaluated in order to enhance the phenols degrading efficiency of the immobilized bacteria. These were: (1) cell activation; (2) cell acclimation; and a combination of (1) and (2). Table 1 shows a comparison of the aforementioned techniques and the control (non-activation and non-acclimation) for phenols removal from the treated POME. The results showed that cell activation, acclimation and a combination of the two methods together were able to improve almost double the phenol reduction of the control sample (Table 1). Comparing between these three methods, the application of either activation method only or a combination of activation and acclimation method had similar result with 63.4% and 65.0% phenols removal from the total phenols of 33 mg/L in the treated POME. However, the acclimation method only provided less efficiency with a phenol removal of 53.5%. The removal efficiencies of our immobilized bacteria were higher than those studied by Limkhuansuwan and Chaiprasert [26]. They found that free cells of Lactobacillus plantarum SF5.6 was able to remove 34.0% of the 33.64 mg/L phenols in the treated POME.
During immobilization process, the bacteria might lose their phenol degradability due to the absence of phenol. An activation of the attached bacteria by providing them with phenol-CFMM could therefore stimulate the induction/maintenance of the phenols-degrading enzymes needed for biodegradation. In the previous studies, the bacterial and fungal acclimation in diluted wastewater containing phenols was found to efficiently remove phenols in undiluted wastewater. These include Pseudomonas putida ATCC 17484 [42] and white-rot fungus Trametes versicolor [22]. Kumar and Mohanty [43] reported that mixed microbial culture isolated from the sludge of effluent treatment plant of a refinery could biodegrade up to 750 mg/L of phenol after acclimatization. Our results also corresponded to those of Lu et al. [44]. They found that white-rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium was able to remove over 84% of phenols from coking wastewater and 80% of COD after activation with phenol and acclimation with 50% diluted coking wastewater.
Accordingly, activation and/or acclimation process could be efficient methods for the improvement of the degradation efficiency of phenols-degrading bacteria. However, activation process seemed to be more attractive since it was convenient and less time-consuming for application. It was found that pH of the treated POME slightly decreased after treated with activated immobilized bacteria. They also were able to reduce 86.8% COD, 70% total nitrogen, 5.8% total phosphorus, 83.3% oil and grease, and 25% color (Table 2). The number of phenol-degrading bacteria on EFBs was 2.3 × 1010 CFU/g EFBs at the beginning and increased to 4.8 × 1010 CFU/g EFBs after 7 days incubation. In the treated POME, 2.0 × 1010 CFU/mL phenol-degrading bacteria was found at the end of study. This was indicated that the organic content and other nutrients available in EFBs as well as in treated POME could support bacterial growth. The attached bacteria present on EFBs were effective to further remove phenols as seen from their ability to be reused (Fig. 4). Based on this result, the activated immobilized cells were utilized for reusability test in the next section.

3.4. Reusability of Activated Immobilized Bacteria for Phenol (s) Degradation

The stability of Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1 immobilized by EFBs was assessed in several consecutive biodegradation of phenol(s). The ability of cells to degrade phenol(s) after repeated use was determined. The experiments were performed by incubating the activated immobilized bacteria with liquid CFMM containing phenol or with treated POME separately. In liquid CFMM, the immobilized bacteria were able to completely remove all phenol (33 mg/L) after 24 h incubation (Fig. 4). Although, the SEM micrographs showed that there were some changes in the surface of the EFBs and the density of the cells after 5 repeated cycles (Fig. 5(a), (b)). The bacterial activity remained the same throughout application over ten cycles.
Unlike in phenol-CFMM, various kinds of phenols and other organic compounds were present in the treated POME. A lower degradation of phenols in POME might be due to the effect of these components on bacterial activity and/or the competition of carbon source from various organic compounds. About 64.5% to 68.5% of the total phenols (33 mg/L) in the treated POME were removed after 7 days incubation with applications over five cycles. Then the degrading efficiency was reduced by 15.2% to 16.2% by applications over six to ten cycles (Fig. 4). This indicated that the activated immobilized bacteria could maintain their phenol-degrading activity throughout each application and could be reused for at least 10 cycles. The reduction of bacterial activity in the treated POME after applications over five cycles might result from the enzyme inactivation by some phenols components [45] in the treated POME.
In addition, the immobilized bacteria could be stored at 4°C for 4 weeks and maintain their stable phenol degrading activity. These results suggested that the immobilized bacteria on the EFBs had a potential for practical application in the treatment of waste-water contaminated with phenols.

4. Conclusions

The attachment immobilization of Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1 on EFBs residue were facilitated by their EPS structures. This immobilization improved bacterial tolerance to phenol in CFMM up to 5,000 mg/L and the immobilized bacteria degraded phenol more efficiently than suspended bacteria. However, the best way to enhance the efficiency of these immobilized bacteria could be done by activating them in a CFMM containing phenol for 24 h before their utilization. This process was convenient and efficient strategy for enhancing the degradability and stability of phenol-degrading bacteria as seen from their efficiency to remove phenols from treated POME (63.4%) and their ability to be reused.
Findings of this study clearly showed the potential use of the EFBs-immobilized bacteria as an inoculum for the subsequent aerobic post-treatment of previously treated POME from the anaerobic treatment systems. Further study can be done to develop a large-scale bioreactor employing the immobilized bacteria with continuous operation. This is considered to be practical and economical for its application in the real wastewater treatment plant of palm oil mills. Besides, the immobilized bacteria might be utilized for the treatment of various kinds of phenols present in other industrial effluents.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Prince of Songkla University through Researcher Development Grant (Contract no. ENV530101S) and the Graduate School funding. The authors wish to thank the Faculty of Environmental Management and the Center of Excellence on Hazardous Substance Management (HSM) at Prince of Songkla University for kindly providing the laboratory facilities. We are grateful to Piyamart Khongkhaem for her help with bacterial cultivation technique.

References

1. Rupani PF, Singh RP, Ibrahim MH, Esa NReview of current palm oil mill effluent (POME) treatment methods: Vermicomposting as a sustainable practice. World Appl Sci J. 2010;10:1190–1201.


2. Chavalparit O, Rulkens WH, Mol APJ, Khaodhair SOptions for environmental sustainability of the crude palm oil industry in Thailand through enhancement of industrial ecosystems. Environ Dev Sustain. 2006;8:271–287.
crossref

3. Ahmad AL, Ismail S, Bhatia SWater recycling from palm oil mill effluent (POME) using membrane technology. Desalination. 2003;157:87–95.
crossref

4. Alam MZ, Ameem ES, Muyibi SA, Kabbashi NAThe factors affecting the performance of activated carbon prepared from oil palm empty fruit bunches for adsorption of phenol. Chem Eng J. 2009;155:191–198.
crossref

5. Cordova-Rosa SM, Dams RI, Cordova-Rosa EV, Radetski MR, Corrêa AXR, Radetski CMRemediation of phenol-contaminated soil by a bacterial consortium and Acinetobacter calcoaceticus isolated from an industrial wastewater treatment plant. J Hazard Mater. 2009;164:61–66.
crossref pmid

6. Kaewmai R, H-Kittikun A, Suksaroj C, Musikavong CAlternative technologies for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from palm oil mills in Thailand. Environ Sci Tech. 2013;47:12417–12425.
crossref

7. Wu YT, Mohammad WA, Jahim MJ, Anuar NA holistic approach to managing palm oil mill effluent (POME): Biotechnological advances in the sustainable reuse of POME. Biotechnol Adv. 2009;27:40–52.
crossref pmid

8. Ramos-Cormenzana A, Juarez-Jimenez B, Garcia-Pareja MPAntimicrobial activity of olive mill wastewaters (alpechin) and biotransformed olive oil mill wastewater. Int Biodeterior Biodegradation. 1996;38:283–290.
crossref

9. Kılıç NK, Karacakaya P, Duygu E, Dönmez GBiodegradation of phenol by Synechocystis sp. in media including triacontanol hormone. Water Environ J. 2012;26:94–99.
crossref

10. Hernandez JE, Edyvean RGJInhibition of biogas production and biodegradability by substituted phenolic compounds in anaerobic sludge. J Hazard Mater. 2008;160:20–28.
crossref pmid

11. Neoh CH, Lam CY, Lim CK, Yahya A, Ibrahim ZDecolorization of palm oil mill effluent using growing cultures of Curvularia clavata. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2014;21:4397–4408.
crossref

12. Tuck KL, Hayball PJMajor phenolic compounds in olive oil: metabolism and health effects. J Nutr Biochem. 2002;13:636–644.
crossref pmid

13. D’Annibale A, Casa R, Pieruccetti F, Ricci M, Marabottini RLentinula edodes removes phenols from olive-mill wastewater: impact on durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) germinability. Chemosphere. 2004;54:887–894.
crossref pmid

14. Shirzad-Sibon M, Jafari S-J, Farrokhi M, Yang JKRemoval of Phenol from Aqueous Solutions by Activated Red Mud: Equilibrium and Kinetics Studies. Environ Eng Res. 2013;18:247–252.
crossref

15. Said M, Ahmad A, Mohammad AWRemoval of phenol during ultrafiltration of palm oil mill effluent (POME): Effect of pH, ionic strength, pressure and temperature. Der Pharma Chemica. 2013;5:190–196.


16. Di Gioia D, Bertin L, Fava F, Marchetti LBiodegradation of hydroxylated and methoxylated benzoic, phenylacetic and phenylpropenoic acids present in olive mill wastewaters by two bacterial strains. Res Microbiol. 2001;152:83–93.
crossref pmid

17. Di Gioia D, Fava F, Bertin L, Marchetti LBiodegradation of synthetic and natural occurring mixtures of mono-cyclic aromatic compounds present in olive mill wastewaters by two aerobic bacteria. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2001;55:619–626.
crossref pmid

18. Piperidou CI, Chaidou CI, Stalikas CD, Soulti K, Pilidis GA, Balis CBioremediation of olive oil mill wastewater: chemical alterations induced by Azotobacter vinelandii. J Agric Food Chem. 2000;48:1941–1948.
crossref pmid

19. Lakhtar H, Ismaili-Alaoui M, Philippoussis A, Perraud-Gaime I, Roussos SScreening of strains of Lentinula edodes grown on model olive mill wastewater in solid and liquid state culture for polyphenol biodegradation. Int Biodeterior Biodeg. 2010;64:167–172.
crossref

20. García GI, Jimenez Pena PR, Bonilla Venceslada JL, Martín MA, Santos MM, Gómez ERRemoval of phenol compounds from olive mill wastewater using Phanerochaetechrysosporium, Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus terreus and Geotrichum candidum. Process Biochem. 2000;35:751–758.
crossref

21. Asses N, Ayed L, Bouallagui H, Sayadi S, Hamdi MBiodegradation of different molecular-mass polyphenols derived from olive mill wastewaters by Geotrichum candidum. Int Biodeterior Biodeg. 2009;63:407–413.
crossref

22. Ergül FE, Sargın S, Öngen G, Sukan FVDephenolisation of olive mill wastewater using adapted Trametes versicolor. Int Biodeterior Biodeg. 2009;63:1–6.
crossref

23. Robles A, Lucas R, de Cienfuegos GA, Gálvez ABiomass production and detoxification of wastewaters from the olive oil industry by strains of Penicillium isolated from wastewater disposal ponds. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:217–221.
crossref

24. Öngen G, Güngör G, Kanberoglu BDecolorisation and dephenolisation potential of selected Aspergillussection Nigristrains- Aspergillus tubingensis in olive mill wastewater. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;23:519–524.
crossref

25. Ahmadi M, Vahabzadeh F, Bonakdarpour B, Mehranian M, Mofarrah EPhenolic removal in olive oil mill wastewater using loofah-immobilized Phanerochaete chrysosporium. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;22:119–127.
crossref

26. Limkhuansuwan V, Chaiprasert PDecolorization of molasses melanoidins and palm oil mill effluent phenolic compounds by fermentative lactic acid bacteria. J Environ Sci. 2010;22:1209–1217.
crossref

27. Khongkhaem P, Intasiri A, Luepromchai ESilica-immobilized Methylobacterium sp. NP3 and Acinetobacter sp. PK1 degrade high concentrations of phenol. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2011;52:448–455.
crossref pmid

28. Kasuga K, Nojiri H, Yamane H, Kodama T, Omori TCloning and characterization of the genes involvedin the degradation of dibenzofuran by Terrabacter sp. strain DBF63. J Ferment Bioeng. 1997;84:387–399.
crossref

29. Durmaz B, Sanin FDEffect of carbon to nitrogen ratio on the composition of microbial extracellular polymers in activated sludge. Water Sci Technol. 2001;44:221–229.


30. Sanin SL, Sanin FD, Bryers JDEffect of starvation on the adhesive properties of xenobiotic degrading bacteria. Process Biochem. 2003;38:909–914.
crossref

31. Vandevivere P, Kirchman DLAttachment stimulate exopolysaccharide synthesis by a bacterium. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:3280–3286.
pmid pmc

32. Pattanasupong A, Nagase H, Sugimoto E, et alDegradation of Carbendazim and 2–4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by immobilized consortium on loofa sponge. J Biosci Bioeng. 2004;98:28–33.
crossref pmid

33. APHA, AWWA, WEF. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21th edWashington DC: American Public Health Association (APHA); 2005.


34. Lu Q, Sorial GAAdsorption of phenolics on activated carbon-impact of pore size and molecular oxygen. Chemosphere. 2004;55:671–679.
crossref pmid

35. Ng YL, Yan R, Chen XG, et alUse of activated carbon as a support medium for H2S biofiltration and effect of bacterial immobilization on available pore surface. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;66:259–265.
crossref pmid

36. Simova ED, Frengova GI, Beshkova DMExopolysaccharides produced by mixed culture of yeast Rhodotorula rubra GED10 and yogurt bacteria (Streptococcus thermophilus 13a+ Lactobacillus bulgaricus 2–11). J Appl Microbiol. 2004;97:512–519.
crossref pmid

37. Rosche B, Li XZ, Hauer B, Schmid A, Buehler KMicrobial biofilms: a concept for industrial catalysis? Trends Biotechnol. 2009;27:636–643.
crossref pmid

38. Kindzierski WB, Fedorak PM, Gray MR, Hrudey SEActivated carbon and synthetic resins as support material for mathanogenic phenol-degrading consortia-comparison of phenol-degrading activities. Water Environ Res. 1995;67:108–117.
crossref

39. Ying W, Ye T, Bin H, Zhao HB, Bi JN, Cai BLBiodegradation of phenol by free and immobilized Acinetobacter sp. strain PD12. J Environ Sci. 2007;19:222–225.
crossref

40. Ahmad SA, Shamaan NA, Arif NM, Koon GB, Shukor MYA, Syed MAEnhanced phenol degradation by immobilized Acinetobacter sp. strain AQ5NOL. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2012;28:347–352.
crossref pmid

41. Wang X, Gai Z, Yu B, et alDegradation of carbazole by microbial cells immobilized in magnetic gellan gum gel beads. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73:6421–6428.
crossref pmid pmc

42. González G, Herrera G, García MT, Pena MBiodegradation of phenolic industrial wastewater in a fluidized bed bioreactor with immobilized cells of Pseudomonas putida. Bioresour Technol. 2001;80:137–142.
crossref pmid

43. Kumar H, Mohanty KKinetic modeling of phenol biodegradation by mixed microbial culture in static batch mode. Asian J Water Environ Pollut. 2012;9:19–24.


44. Lu Y, Yan L, Wang Y, Zhou S, Fu J, Zhang JBiodegradation of phenolic compounds from coking wastewater by immobilized white rot fungus Phanerochaete chrysosporium. J Hazard Mater. 2009;165:1091–1097.
crossref pmid

45. Diao M, Ouédraogo N, Baba-Moussa L, et alBiodepollution of wastewater containing phenol compounds from leather industry by plant peroxidases. Biodegradation. 2011;22:389–396.
crossref pmid

Fig. 1
Production of exopolysaccharides (EPS) measured by the decline in absorbance of Alcian Blue at 606 nm after incubating mono and mixed culture of strain NP3 and PK1 with EFB. The sterilized EFB without cells (Uninoculated material) was used as control.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-20-2-141f1.gif
Fig. 2
SEM of mixed bacterial cells (strain NP3+PK1) attached to surface (a) and to interconnected pores (b) of EFB and network-like EPS structures adhered to EFB surfaces and to other microorganisms (c) after 6 days incubation.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-20-2-141f2.gif
Fig. 3
Phenol degradation (a) and degradation rate constant (b) after 24 h (10 and 30 mg/L), 72 h (50 mg/L), 96 h (100 mg/L) and 120 h (500 and 5,000 mg/L) of incubation using immobilized and suspended bacteria.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-20-2-141f3.gif
Fig. 4
Reusability of activated immobilized bacteria for biodegradation of 33 mg/L phenol(s) in liquid CFMM and in treated POME.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-20-2-141f4.gif
Fig. 5
Changes in EFB surface and number of immobilized bacteria explored by SEM before (a) and after (b) 5-cycle of repeated use.
/upload/thumbnails/eer-20-2-141f5.gif
Table 1
Removal of Phenols from Treated POME by Activated and/or Acclimated Immobilized Bacteria Compared to Control
Technique phenols degradation (%)*
Non-activation & non-acclimation 35.0 ± 1.4a
Acclimation 53.5 ± 1.5b
Activation 63.4 ± 0.4c
Activation and acclimation 65.0 ± 4.7c

* An initial phenols concentration of 33 mg/L was detected in the treated POME. Phenols degradation was determined after 7-d incubation by comparing with the initial phenols concentration. Values given are average of three samples ± standard deviation. Comparisons between four techniques are significantly different (LSD, P < 0.05) if designed with different-letters.

Table 2
Characteristics of the Sterilized POME Before and After Treatment with Activated Immobilized Bacteria After 7 days of Incubation
Parameter Before treatment After treatment
pH 8.2 7.9
COD (mg/L) 10,296.0 1,355.0
Total nitrogen (mg/L) 210.0 64.0
Total phosphorus (mg/L) 17.2 16.2
Oil and grease (mg/L) 30.0 5.0
Phenols (mg/L) 33.0 12.1
Color (%) 100.0 75.0
No. of phenol-degrading bacteria on EFB (× 109 CFU/g) 23.0 48.0
No. of phenol-degrading bacteria in POME (× 109 CFU/mL) - 20.0

[i] -: Not detected.

TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  E-Mail
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
2
Crossref
1
Scopus
2,242
View
26
Download
Editorial Office
464 Cheongpa-ro, #726, Jung-gu, Seoul 04510, Republic of Korea
TEL : +82-2-383-9697   FAX : +82-2-383-9654   E-mail : eer@kosenv.or.kr

Copyright© Korean Society of Environmental Engineers. All rights reserved.        Developed in M2community
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers