Environ Eng Res > Volume 25(4); 2020 > Article
Gupta, Kumar, Kumar, Gehlaut, Gaur, Sachan, and Park: Synthesis of biodegradable films obtained from rice husk and sugarcane bagasse to be used as food packaging material

### Abstract

The current study stresses on the reuse of waste lignocellulose biomass (rice husk and sugarcane bagasse) for the synthesis of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and further conversion of this CMC into a biodegradable film. Addition of commercial starch was done to form biodegradable film due to its capacity to form a continuous matrix. Plasticizers such as Glycerol and citric acid were used to provide flexibility and strength to the film. Biopolymer film obtained from sugarcane bagasse CMC showed maximum tensile strength and elongation in comparison to the film synthesized from commercial CMC and CMC obtained from rice husk. It has been observed that an increase in sodium glycolate/NaCl content in CMC imposed an adverse effect on tensile strength. Opacity, moisture content, and solubility of the film increased with a rise in the degree of substitution of CMC. Therefore, CMC obtained from sugarcane bagasse was better candidate in preparing biopolymer/biocomposite film.

### 1. Introduction

Today millions of tons of plastics are generated every year throughout the globe and both manufacturing and consumption continues to rise, this rise has developed severe environmental issues [1]. Many attempts have been made to acquire an environmentally friendly material to fix the problems associated with the plastic waste. Most of the research focuses on replacing petro-based plastic with biodegradable products with comparable characteristics and low price [2]. Around 322 million tons of plastics were produced worldwide in 2015. India manufactured 8.3 million tons in 2014–2015, but about 1% of plastics have been replaced by the biodegradable polymer [3]. In recent years, food packaging has got a lot of attention as a market for biodegradable films. These products will help to reduce environmental pollution in long term [4]. Natural polysaccharides are increasingly attracting researcher attention as they are abundant, viable, eco-friendly, non-toxic, biodegradable, and biocompatible [5]. Researchers are focusing on producing biodegradable films based on polysaccharides as a substitute to regularly used plastic films which are achieved from petrochemical sources to reduce overall environmental impact [6, 7]. This study focuses on the different materials such as commercial carboxymethylcellulose (CMC) obtained from the market and lab-made CMCs obtained from biomass like sugarcane bagasse (SCB) and rice husk. The impact of starch has also been studied on properties of CMC biofilm. Biopolymer films are broadly used in the pharmaceutical industries, packaging, and agriculture. Cellulose exists in both amorphous and crystalline nature due to the existence of hemicellulose and lignin in a complex polymer matrix [8, 9]. Cellulose is linear in shape and high-molecular-weight polymer and due to the presence of intermolecular and intramolecular–OH bonding; it barely mixed freely in common solvents. CMC is highly water-soluble polysaccharide formed by mercerization (sodium hydroxide) and etherification (Monochloroacetic acid) process [10, 11]. CMC is white in color, odorless, tasteless, non-toxic, free-flowing powder, biodegradable, biocompatible, hydrophilic, and good film forming agent [12, 13]. The linear chain of CMC is commonly used in oil detergents, exploration, paper products, cosmetics, textile, and food industries [1416]. CMC has the polymeric configuration and a high molecular weight that exhibits thermal gelation, and it is capable of forming filled in bio-composite films. To increase the water resistance and tensile strength (TS) of the starch-based films, CMC was used in most of the problems [2]. Starch is also one of the most important polysaccharides, as it is reusable, a relatively economical natural polymer. It is commonly used to form decomposable films because of its ability to form a continuous matrix. Starch is hydrophilic and suffers from poor mechanical properties that make it unattractive under different environmental conditions as compared to other synthetic polymers. Starch offers both poor mechanical properties and poor water resistance [17]. The citric acid (CA) having multi carboxyl cross-linking improves the water barrier and mechanical properties of the films [18, 19]. Starch modification with crosslinking is commonly used in the food industry to produce nutritionally beneficial effects and restricted swelling [20]. In plasticizers, molecular volume increases due to reducing in internal hydrogen bonding between polymer chains, and hence, it increases the flexibility of films [21]. Olive oil and fatty acids are introduced to increase the water barrier in the film emulsion [22]. Glycerol is hydrophilic, decreases intermolecular forces between plasticizer and increases the movement of polymer chains, a procedure mostly used to increase the flexibility and extensibility of biodegradable films [23]. In this paper, biopolymer film is prepared from Commercial as well as lab-made CMCs extracted from different biomass sources. The main objective of this work was to make the comparative study between Starch-Commercial CMC and Starch-Lab made CMCs prepare biopolymer film.

### 2.1. Raw Material

Commercial CMC, which is purchased from the market, having a higher molecular weight in the range (Mw = 10,000 Da, DS = 0.51) was acquired from Molychem. We manufactured CMCs from rice husk and SCB by using Sodium Chlorite, Monochloroacetic acid, Sulfuric Acid, Acetic Acid, Sodium Hydroxide, Potassium hydroxide, 2,7-dihydroxynaphthalene (Merck), Sodium chlorite (Sigma Aldrich), ethanol (Merck) and Hydrochloric Acid (Merck). These chemicals were purchased from the local market in Allahabad, India. Plasticizer film formed using Starch (SRL), glycerol (Rankem), citrus acid (Merck). The chemicals used for the characterization of CMC are Methanol (Merck), nitric acid (Sigma Aldrich), glacial acetic acid (Merck), Glycolic acid (Rankem), sodium chloride (Merck) and Acetone (Merck).

### 2.2. Isolation of Cellulose from Rice Husk

#### 2.2.1. Moisture removal and milling

The collected rice husk was first washed with distilled water and then placed in an oven at 70°C for 16 h. After that, the rice husk was crushed in a grinder and sieved through a 60-mesh screen.

#### 2.2.2. Alkali treatment

Alkali treatment using potassium hydroxide (instead of sodium hydroxide) was done to remove silica present in the rice husk. It also removed some part of lignin and hemicellulose. 100 g of screened out rice husk was mixed with potassium hydroxide (6% w/v) and constantly stirred at 85°C for 2 h. After the alkaline treatment, the biomass fibers were washed, filtered, and dried overnight in an oven at 70°C.

#### 2.2.3. Acid hydrolysis

Acid hydrolysis empowers removal of the amorphous regions of cellulose fibers. This affects the fibers morphology, thermal stability, structure, and crystallinity [24]. After the alkaline treatment, the lignin and other impurities remaining in the fibers were removed by acid hydrolysis with dilute H2SO4 (4% v/v) and stirred at 85°C for 2–2.5 h. The treated biomass fibers were washed and filtered with distilled water then after the fibers were dried for the whole night in an oven at 70°C.

#### 2.2.4. Bleaching

Bleaching of Rice husk was done for 4 h using sodium chlorite (3% w/v) at 80°C for removing coloring components. The bleaching procedure was kept at pH 3–4 by adding an appropriate quantity of acetic acid. After washing with distilled water, white cellulose fibers were dried for the whole night in an oven at 70°C.

### 2.3. Isolation of Cellulose from SCB

#### 2.3.1. Moisture removal and size reduction

First, 500 g of SCB was drenched in distilled water for 1 d to eliminate extractives that are easily soluble in water and dried in an oven at 70°C for 2 d. After that, SCB was crushed and passed through a 60-mesh size screen.

#### 2.3.2. Alkali treatment

2% NaOH was mixed with 50 g of bagasse (dry basis) before feeding it to the reactor at 80°C for 2–2.5 h. The treated SCB biomass fibers were washed and filtered with distilled water then after the fibers were dried for the whole night in an oven at 70°C.

#### 2.3.3. Acid hydrolysis

After the alkaline treatment, the lignin and other impurities remaining in the fibers were removed by acid hydrolysis with dilute H2SO4 (4% v/v) and stirred at 85°C for 2–2.5 h. The treated SCB biomass fibers were washed and filtered with distilled water to attain pH 7 and then dried for the whole night in an oven at 70°C.

#### 2.3.4. Bleaching

Degree of whiteness was obtained by using sodium chlorite (4% w/v) at 80°C for 4 h. The pH was kept in the range of 3 to 4 during the bleaching process. The pH was controlled by adding acetic acid. After washing, white cellulose fibers were dried for the whole night in an oven at 70°C.

### 2.4. Preparation of CMC from Rice Husk and SCB Cellulose

The cellulose made from rice husk and SCB waste were dried for 1 h in an oven at 70°C, and after that to avoid the moisture, it was put into the desiccator. There are dual phases for the preparation of CMC. The 1st phase is mercerization then the 2nd one is etherification. Mercerization was done to increase strength and for a lustrous appearance.

#### 2.4.1. Mercerization

Mercerization was done by taking 10 g of each cellulose samples obtained from Rice husk and SCB waste in two different beakers. 100 mL of isopropanol and 20% w/v NaOH was added to each cellulose sample. The mixture was stirred for 2.5 to 4 h from 50°C to 60°C then after the sample was washed and filtered with an appropriate amount of distilled water up to the pH reached 6.5–7. The washed alkaline fibers were cleaned and kept in an oven for 3.5–4 h at 70°C, and then it was referring for 2nd phase etherification process.

#### 2.4.2. Etherification

The product of mercerization mixed with 100 mL of 20% Mono-chloroacetic acid (MCA) solution and stirred for 2.5 to 4 h from 50°C to 60°C. After the completion of the 2nd phase reaction, the sample was washed and filtered with ethanol and HCl mixture (mixed in the same capacity). The salt formed during side reaction was neutralized by ethanol and remaining HCl neutralized by NaOH present in the etherification reaction [10]. The remnant left on the filter paper was CMC, which was dried for the whole night in an oven at 60°C for further characterization. The schematic procedure for the production of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) from cellulose is shown in Fig. 1.

### 2.5. Production of Biopolymer Film

#### 2.5.1. CMC-Starch blended film

1g CMCs was mixed in 75 mL of water at 70°C for 15 min. Separately 1 g starch was added (25°C for 10 min) in 100 mL of water and glycerol (40 mL/100 g starch) and 0.5 CA 10% (w/w starch). These mixtures were shaking by the stirrer for 20 min at 85°C. The CMCs and Starch mixer were added side by side (75 mL CMCs solution + 100 mL CA-Starch solution) and continuously stirred at 70°C for 15 min (pH = 5.5). After the solution mixed for 20 min at 40°C to distinct all air bubbles. Then, 70 mL of solution was discharged into a Petri dish and then dried for a whole night at 55°C in an oven to cast blended films. The whole process is shown in Fig. 2(a) and (b).

#### 2.5.2. Degree of substitution (DS)

DS is the number of −OH group that was substituted by -CH2-COOH group in the cellulose configuration at C2, C3, and C6 position [12]. For determining DS of CMC, 2 g of moisture-free CMCs samples obtained from rice husk and SCB were taken in two different beakers and marked them accordingly. After that, 15 mL of 70% v/v methanol-water solution were added in each beaker, mix them well, and allowed them to stand for 15–20 min. Then 200 mL of distilled water and 50 mL of 0.5 N sodium hydroxide were added to each beaker and stirred for 4 h. Quantity of unreacted NaOH present in each beaker was titrated against 0.4 N solution of HCl by adding phenolphthalein as an indicator. The readings of the quantity of HCl needed for the titration were used in Eq. (1), to calculate the DS.
##### (1)
$DS=(0.162×B)(1-0.058×B)$
Where
B = milli-equivalents of total carboxyl groups per g of sample taken and is calculated using Eq. (2).
##### (2)
$B=(mL of NaOH×Normality of NaOH)-(mL of HCl×Normality of HCl)grams of sample$

#### 2.5.3. CMC yield

CMC yield was an estimate on the dry weight basis, and the total dry weight of CMC was an estimate as per the subsequent equation [12].
##### (3)
$Yield=(gram of CM​C1 g of cellulose)$

#### 2.5.4. CMC content

In 100 mL of 80% (methanol-water) solution, 1.50 g of dried CMCs was mixed. This solution was stirred, then stored for 15 min and then filtered. The cake on filter paper was washed with newly prepare 100 mL of 80% (methanol-water) solution and then dried at 100°C to acquire CMC [16]. The content of CMC was estimated by using Eq. (4).
##### (4)
$Where: CMC content (%)=M1M2×100$
M2 = Final dried mass (g), M1 = Initial dried mass (g)

#### 2.5.5. NaCl content in CMC

NaCl content can be determined by adding 2 g of CMCs in 250 mL of 65% (methanol-water) and left for 4 h. 100 mL of the aqueous phase was neutralized by diluted nitric acid and titrated by 0.1 N silver nitrate solutions [16]. By using equation, 5 NaCl content was calculated.
##### (5)
$NaCl (%)=1.461×PW$
Where
• P = amount of silver nitrate (mL)

• W = weight of the dried sample (g)

#### 2.5.6. Sodium glycolate content

5 mL glacial acetic acid and 5 mL distilled water were taken in a separate beaker, and 0.50 g of CMCs was added to each beaker. Then 1 g sodium chloride and 50 mL acetone was added and stirred for 20 min for complete precipitation of CMC mixture [16]. A strong supernatant was used to formulate the test solution after the mixture being filtered. The single reagent was used for the preparation of the reference solution. The reference solution and the test solution were placed in a water bath for 20 min, and acetones were dispatched from both the solution, then after solutions were cooled. After the solution is cooled addition of 20 mL of 2, 7-dihydroxynaphthalene was done. The wavelength for UV-VIS spectrophotometer was set to 540 nm for observing the absorbance peaks of the reference solution related to the test solution. Glycolic acid was used to define the unidentified amount of sodium glycolate in the test solution using the following Eq. (6) and plotted calibration curve of the pure standard.
##### (6)
$Sodium glycolate %=D×1.29C$
Where 1.29 is a conversion factor for changing glycolic acid into sodium glycolate
• D = mg of glycolic acid determines from the calibration curve

• C = the dry weight of the sample in g.

### 2.6. Characterization of CMC

Cellulose and CMCs have been characterized by performing XRD and Fourier transforms infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and accordingly, a comparison was made among them based on their core analysis.

#### 2.6.1. FTIR

FTIR shows component variations in the polymer structure. For examination, pellets were produced after crushing the sample with KBR. Spectra were taken on Perkin Elmer Bx11- FTIR Spectrophotometer, in the range of 4,000-400 cm−1.

#### 2.6.2. Wide-angle X-ray diffraction (XRD) pattern

The crushed dried samples were compressed into the disks and then measured with an X-ray diffractometer in which patterns were recorded with X-ray diffractometer system using a Cu Ka radiation (1¼ 1.5406 Å) in the 2 q range from 5° to 70°, worked at 40 mA and 40 kV, and a scanning speed of 10° min−1.

### 2.7. Characterization of Biopolymer Film

#### 2.7.1. Moisture content (MC)

Generally, the AOAC method is used for calculating MC [25]. Sample containing 2 g dry sample to constant weight at 90–100°C under pressure less than 100 mm Hg. Calculate the loss in weight after the material was drying.

#### 2.7.2. Solubility

In a hot oven, film specimens were dried at 105°C to remove the MC. The dry sample is then weighted and placed with 20 mL of distilled water in a glass tube. The tubes were covered and placed at room temperature for 1 d in a shaking water bath. After that, film pieces were removed and dried at 105°C in an oven for 1 d to calculate the film’s final dry weight [23].
##### (7)
$Solubility %=(initial dry weight)-(final dry weight)initial dry weight×100$

#### 2.7.3. Film opacity

Film opacity was estimated by obtaining rectangular strips (10mm × 40mm), which were straight placed in the UV-VIS spectrophotometer [26]. The film sample’s absorption peak was recorded from 250 to 800 nm. The film opacity in the absorbance spectrum was observed at 600 nm.

#### 2.7.4. TS

Films were cut into pieces of dimension 10 mm wide and 80 mm long. The mechanical property (TS and elongation) were measured using TENIUS OLSEN machine 250N load cell. The cross-head speed and initial grip separation were set between 1 mm/min and 40 mm.

### 3.1. Characterization of Waste Lignocellulosic Biomass

The yield of CMCs, DS, NaCl, and Sodium glycolate obtained from rice husk and SCB were calculated and shown in Table 1. The amount of the byproduct obtained from SCB (NaCl 0.87% and Sodium glycolate 0.6%) was insignificant in amount as compared to rice husk (NaCl 4.38% and Sodium glycolate 3.29%), an undesired side reaction took place, which dominated the rice husk CMC production and became the reason for this observation [22]. Production of Sodium glycolate leads to the reduction in DS. As the concentration of NaOH increases, it tends to interrupt the cellulose chain formation by alkaline hydrolysis [27]. Sodium glycolate is poisonous in nature, and the ratio of sodium glycolate and NaCl content should not be more than 0.5% in food additives [12]. The purity of lab-made CMC obtained from SCB is 98.53%, which is a much higher purity as compared to Commercial CMC, which stood around 95.04%.

### 3.2. XRD Analysis

XRD was performed to examine the crystallinity of cellulose and CMC extracted from rice husk and SCB formed by Carboxymethylation with 20%NaOH and 20% MCA [10]. Fig. 3(a) and (b) displays the crystalline peaks of cellulose isolated from rice husk and SCB and their synthesized CMC, respectively. In two cases, CMC was synthesized by mercerization with 20% w/v NaOH. In XRD spectra it is visible that the crystalline peaks are stronger in cellulose isolated from rice husk and SCB as compared to spectra exhibited by CMC. XRD type Peak’s height & width were significantly changed due to the breaking of the -OH bond that maintained the crystalline configuration by replacing -OH by (-CH2-COOH) groups. The decrease in crystallinity is significant in applications, like manufacturing of hydrogels, enhanced capability of CMC to absorb water due to an increase in the amorphous region [28]. Peak heights in XRD spectra of cellulose are greater than peak heights of lignocellulose and CMCs. The CMCs shows less crystallinity than cellulose because, during mercerization, the hydrogen bonding gets ruptured in an alkaline environment. The crystalline peak in XRD spectra of CMCs gets shifted due to the breakage of β-1, 4 glycosidic bonding which is responsible for an increase in the gap among cellulose molecules. A higher DS of CMC results in broader crystallinity peak and a decrease in crystallinity [15].

### 3.3. FTIR Analysis

The CMCs obtained from Rice husk, and SCB was analyzed by FTIR. The spectrum of synthesized CMCs was shown in Fig. 4. The FTIR spectral marked that the broad absorption band in the rice husk (3,326 cm−1), and SCB (3,260 cm−1) is due to the stretching occurring in the -OH group [15]. A band at rice husk (2,890 cm−1) and SCB (2,914 cm−1) is attributed to C-H stretching vibration. The existence of a new and strong absorption band at rice husk (1,638 cm−1) and SCB (1,586 cm−1) confirms the stretching vibration of the −COOH group. Rice husk (1,372 cm−1) and SCB (1,408 cm−1) band are assigned to -CH2 scissoring vibrations [30]. The band around rice husk (1,022 cm−1) and SCB (1,018 cm−1) are assigned to -OH bending vibration and C-O-C bond stretching [31].

### 3.4. Effect of Moisture Absorption, Solubility, and Opacity on Plasticizer Films

Table 1 shows that the moisture absorption, solubility, and opacity of the CMCs-Starch film. It was found that the absorption of moisture for Starch-Commercial CMC was less than the Starch-Lab made CMCs film, but an increase in DS also increases the moisture absorption capacity. CMC is hydrophilic in nature, but its hydrophilicity is lesser than that of starch [18, 19]. CMC also improves the water resistance capability of starch matrix and form hydrogen bonds with −OH and -COOH groups of CMC to make a strong structure and diminish the diffusion of water molecules. Moisture absorption, solubility, and opacity also increase with an increase in DS and glycerol concentration [22]. This result indicates that starch and CMC combination improves the water resistance [19]. Glycerol is responsible for films flexibility and smooth surface [23, 32]. Due to an increase in free volume, plasticizer mobility increases hence increase the amorphous nature [21]. The film opacity significantly increased with increasing CMC content or DS. CA is acknowledged as a cross-linking agent for starch amendment. CA also increases water barrier and mechanical properties because the presence of the multi-carboxyl structure and can build a stronger bond of hydrogen between the −OH groups present on starch molecules [2].

### 3.5. Effect of the TS and Elongation on Plasticizer Films

Table 1 shows that DS also affects the TS, and the film composed with CMCs of higher DS have better TS. The DS and TS of rice husk CMC was less than that of SCB; this is due to the presence of high NaCl and sodium glycolate content in the rice husk [22]. The TS and elongation percentage of these samples could indicate the presence of hydrogen bonds between the CMC chains [19]. The higher CMC content increases film TS and −OH bonds between the polysaccharide derivative and cellulose fiber [6]. The biopolymer film synthesized from Starch-Lab made CMCs showed a better result than the biopolymer film prepared with Starch-Commercial CMC. CMC also improved elongation percentage and TS. Table 1 shows that SCB based CMC displayed more TS compared to other lab-made CMC. The cross-linking of starch with CMC molecule increases the intermolecular bonding by introducing covalent bond in term to improve the TS of biopolymer film [19]. Table 2 shows the comparative studies between lab-made CMC (SCB and rice husk) and commercial CMC.

### 4. Conclusions

In this study biopolymer film was produced from CMCs synthesized from different lignocellulosic biomass such as rice husk and SCB. The biopolymer film prepared from blended Starch-Lab made CMC solution showed better mechanical properties TS and Elongation) than the film prepared from blended Starch-Commercial CMC solution. Cross-linking of a starch molecule increases the intermolecular hydrogen bond, which increases in TS. Addition of plasticizers in the film increases the film flexibility and reduces the MC of biopolymer film. The blended film composed of CMC obtained from SCB showed more TS (16.03 MPa) and elongation (18.97%) as compared to the film composed of CMC obtained from rice husk (TS 12.72 MPa and Elongation 12.69%) and commercial CMC (TS 11.96 MPa and 12.14%). The DS of CMC obtained from SCB is more than the DS of commercial CMC and CMC obtained from rice husk because of less content of sodium glycolate and NaCl. MC, solubility, and opacity of the film increase with an increase in DS of CMC. FTIR and XRD data confirm that CMCs were successfully synthesized. The CMC obtained from SCB can be used to prepare a bio-degradable film because it possesses flexibility, acceptable opacity, and mechanical property for use in the food packaging industry.

### Acknowledgment

On the very outset of this work, I would like to extend my sincere & heartfelt obligation to CIR, MNNIT Allahabad and Department of Physics, IIT Kanpur who have helped me in this endeavor.

### References

1. Khazaei N, Esmaiili M, Djomeh ZE, Ghasemlou M, Jouki M. Characterization of new biodegradable edible film made from basil seed(Ocimum basilicum L.) gum. Carbohydr Polym. 2014;102:199–206.

2. Almasi H, Ghanbarzadeh B, Entezami AA. Physicochemical properties of Starch CMC-nonclay biodegradable films. Int J Biol Macromol. 2010;46:1–5.

3. Yadav A, Mangaraj S, Singh R, Das SK, MNK , Arora S. Biopolymers as packaging material in food and allied industry. Int J Chem Stud. 2018;6:2411–2418.

4. Dashipour A, Razavilar V, Hosseini H, et al. Antioxidant and antimicrobial carboxymethyl cellulose films containing zataria multiflora essential oil. 2015;72:606–613.

5. Wang H, Gong X, Miao Y, et al. Preparation and characterization of multilayer films composed of chitosan, sodium alginate and carboxymethyl chitosan-ZnO nanoparticles. Food Chem. 2019;283:397–403.

6. Antosik AK, Wilpiszewska K. Natural composite based on polysaccharide derivatives: Preparation and physicochemical properties. Chem Pap. 2018;72:3215–3218.

7. Roy N, Saha N, Kitano T, Saha P. Biodegradation of PVP-CMC hydrogel film: A useful food packaging material. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;89:346–353.

8. Ho MC, Ong VZ, Wu TY. Potential use of alkaline hydrogen peroxide in lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment and valorization - A review. Renew Sust Energ Rev. 2019;112:78–86.

9. Loow Y-L, New EK, Yang GH, Ang LY, Foo LYW, Wu TY. Potential use of deep eutectic solvents to facilitate lignocellulosic biomass utilization and conversion. Cellulose. 2017;24:3591–3618.

10. Gulati I, Park J, Maken S, Lee MG. Production of Carboxymethyl cellulose fibers from waste lignocellulosic sawdust using NaOH/NaClO2 pretreatment. Fibers Polym. 2014;15:680–686.

11. Kumar H, Gaur A, Kumar S, Park JW. Development of silver nanoparticles-loaded CMC hydrogel using bamboo as a raw material for special medical applications. Chem Pap. 2018;

12. Mondal MIH, Yeasmin MS, Rahman MS. Preparation of food grade carboxymethyl cellulose from corn husk agrowaste. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;79:144–150.

13. Su JF, Huang Z, Yuan XY, Wang XY, Min L. Structure and properties of carboxymethyl cellulose/soy protein isolate blend edible films cross-linked by Maillard reactions. Carbohydr Polym. 2010;79:145–153.

14. Joshi G, Naithani S, Varshney VK, Bisht SS, Rana V, Gupta PK. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose from office waste paper: A greener approach towards waste management. Waste Manage. 2014;38:33–40.

15. Mohkami M, Talaeipour M. Investigation of the chemical structure of carboxylated and carboxymethylated fibers from waste paper via XRD and FTIR analysis. Bio Resources. 2011;6:1988–2003.

16. Togrul H, Arslan N. Production of carboxymethyl cellulose from sugar beet pulp cellulose and rheological behavior of carboxymethyl cellulose. Carbohydr Polym. 2003;54:73–82.

17. Mohsenabadi N, Rajaei A, Tabatabaei M, Mohsenifar A. Physical and antimicrobial properties of starch-carboxy methylcellulose film containing rosemary essential oils encapsulated in chitosan naogel. Int J Biol Macromol. 2018;112:148–155.

18. Ma W, Tang CH, Yin SW, Yang XQ, Qi JR, Xia N. Effect of homogenization conditions on properties of gelatin-olive oil composite films. J Food Eng. 2012;113:136–142.

19. Ghanbarzadeh B, Almasi H, Entezami AA. Physical properties of edible modified starch/carboxymethyl cellulose films. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol. 2010;11:697–702.

20. Koo SH, Lee KY, Lee HG. Effect of cross-linking on the physicochemical and physiological properties of corn starch. Food Hydrocolloid. 2010;24:619–625.

21. Mali S, Grossmann MVE, Garcia MA, Martino MN, Zaritzky NE. Effects of controlled storage on thermal, mechanical and barrier properties of plasticized films from different starch sources. J Food Eng. 2006;75:453–460.

22. Rodsamran P, Sothornvit R. Rice stubble as a new biopolymer source to produce carboxymethyl cellulose-blended films. Carbohydr Polym. 2017;171:94–101.

23. Jouki M, Khazaei N, Ghasemlou M, Hadinezhad M. Effect of glycerol concentration on edible film production from cress seed carbohydrate gum. Carbohydr Polym. 2013;96:39–46.

24. Ilyas RA, Sapuan SM, Ishak MR. Isolation and characterization of nanocrystalline cellulose from sugar palm fibres (Arenga Pinnata). Carbohydr Polym. 2018;181:1038–1051.

25. AOAC. Office methods of analysis of AOAC International. 17th edGaithersburg MD: Association of Official Analytical Chemists; c2002. Available From: https://www.chemicalbook.com/ChemicalProductProperty_EN_CB72096013.htmm

26. Pereda M, Amica G, Marcovich NE. Development and characterization of edible chitosan/olive oil emulsion films. Carbohydr Polym. 2012;87:1318–1325.

27. Saputra AH, Qadhayna L, Pitaloka AB. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) from water Hyacinth using Ethanol-Isobutyl Alcohol Mixture as the solvents. Int J Chem Eng Appl. 2014;5:36–40.

28. Spychaj T, Wilpiszewska K, Zdanowicz M. Medium and high substituted carboxymethyl starch: Synthesis, characterization, and applications. Starch-Starke. 2013;65:22–33.

29. Gu H, He J, Huang Y, Guo Z. Water-soluble Carboxymethylcellulosefibers polymers derived from alkalization-etherification of viscose fibers. Fibers Polym. 2012;13:748–753.

30. Rachtanapun P, Rattanapanone N. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose powder and films from Mimosa pigra. J Appl Polym Sci. 2011;122:3218–3226.

31. Yeasmin MS, Mondal MIH. Synthesis of highly substituted carboxymethyl cellulose depending on cllulose particle size. Int J Biol Macromol. 2015;80:725–731.

32. Dick M, Costa TMH, Gomaa A, Subirade M, Rios ADO, Flores SH. Edible film production from chia seed mucilage: Effect of glycerol concentration on its physicochemical and mechanical properties. Carbohydr Polym. 2015;130:198–205.

33. Asl SA, Mousavi M, Labbafi M. Synthesis and characterization of carboxymethyl cellulose from sugarcane bagasse. J food Proc Technol. 2017;8:687–692.

##### Fig. 1
Mechanism of synthesis of CMC from cellulose.
##### Fig. 2
(a) Preparation of bioploymer film from lab made CMC, (b) Preparation procedure of bioploymer film from lab made CMC.
##### Fig. 3
X-ray Diffractogram of isolated cellulose and CMC from (a) Rice husk (b) Sugarcane bagasse.
##### Fig. 4
FTIR spectra of CMC synthesized from Rice husk and Sugarcane bagasse.
##### Table 1
Properties of CMC and Film Produced from Different Lignocellulosic Biomass
Waste along with Commercial CMC

Biomass waste Yield of CMC DS CMC content (%) NaCl content (%) Sodium glycolate (%)
Commercial - 0.51 95.04 3.53 1.43
Rice husk 0.8933 0.53 92.33 4.38 3.29
Sugarcane bagasse 0.9457 0.65 98.53 0.87 0.6
Properties of Biopolymer film

Biomass waste Ratio (Starch:CMC) Moisture content (%) Solubility (%) Opacity (%) Tensile strength Elongation (%)
Commercial 50:50 11.018 27.19 5.23 11.96 12.14
Rice husk 50:50 12.57 28.11 17.28 12.72 12.69
Sugarcane bagasse 50:50 12.83 39.56 21.23 16.03 18.97
##### Table 2
Comparative Study between Lab-made CMC and Commercial CMC
Biomass Previous study Biomass Current study

DS TS(MPa) Elongation (%) DS TS (MPa) Elongation (%)
Rice stubble [22] 0.64 3.20 4.33 Rice husk 0.53 12.72 12.69
Sugarcane bagasse [33] 0.45 21 2 Sugarcane bagasse 0.65 16.03 18.97
Commercial (CMC) [22] 0.75–0.85 13.87 7.54 Commercial (CMC) 0.51 11.96 12.14
TOOLS
Full text via DOI
E-Mail
Print
Share:
METRICS
 4 Crossref
 3 Scopus
 3,953 View